Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-01661
Original file (BC-2008-01661.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2008-01661
            INDEX CODE:  113.00
            COUNSEL:  NONE
            HEARING DESIRED:  NO


_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He receive Vietnam service credit in order to be eligible for Department  of
Veterans Affairs (DVA) benefits.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He flew to Vietnam on at least seven different  occasions  as  a  loadmaster
and as a medical technician.  His records reflect that he was assigned to  a
flying position at the hospital  located  at  Eglin  Air  Force  Base  as  a
surgical technician.

In support of his request, the applicant provided a  report  of  contact  to
the DVA and a DD Form 214.

His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant served in the Regular Air Force for 4  years,        7  months
and 27 days.  On 30 April 1976, he received an honorable discharge.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial.  DPAPP requested that  the  applicant  provide
some documentation reflecting his military service in Vietnam;  however,  he
did not respond to their request.

The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________






APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded  to  the  applicant  on  19
September 2008 for review and comment within 30  days.   As  of  this  date,
this office has received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest  of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  In this respect, persuasive  evidence  has
not been presented that would corroborate his contention that he  flew  into
Vietnam on several different occasions.   Absent  such  evidence,  we  agree
with the opinion and recommendation of  the  Air  Force  office  of  primary
responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion  that
the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.   Therefore,
in the absence of other persuasive evidence to  the  contrary,  we  find  no
compelling  basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief   sought   in   this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2008-
01661 in Executive Session on 23 October 2008, under the provisions  of  AFI
36-2603:

      Thomas E. Markiewicz, Chair
      Mr. Elwood C. Lewis III, Member
      Mr. Kurt R. LaFrance, Member




The following documentary  evidence  for  Docket  Number  BC-2008-01661  was
considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 19 April 2008, w/atch.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 16 September 2008.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 September 2008.




                                   THOMAS E. MARKIEWICZ
                                   Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02198

    Original file (BC-2008-02198.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-02198 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His AF Form 7, Airman Military Record, Section two, Foreign Service, Foreign Service Summary be expanded to list dates and locations of his temporary duty (TDY) assignments to Vietnam. The applicant’s complete submission, with...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03788

    Original file (BC-2006-03788.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He can provide written affidavits from fellow airman he served with and suggest his pay records be checked for combat payments during this time. In support of his request, the applicant provided a personal letter and a copy of his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00616

    Original file (BC-2008-00616.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-00616 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXX. DPAPP states based on their review, there are no documents that show a place and time that he served overseas in Vietnam. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02775

    Original file (BC-2008-02775.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our decision that the applicant has failed to sustain his burden of proof of the existence of either an error or an injustice. Exhibit D. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 10 Sep 08. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Sep 08.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01661

    Original file (BC-2004-01661.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance;...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02677

    Original file (BC-2006-02677.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02677 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 1 MARCH 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect credit for five months TDY to Vietnam, in order to qualify for the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The DPAPP complete evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-04099

    Original file (BC-2007-04099.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In a letter dated 10 Jan 08, the applicant was informed that no documentation exists in his service records to show he was TDY to Guam during the time in question. To date, this information has not been provided (Exhibit C). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for the conclusion that the applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02837

    Original file (BC-2007-02837.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02837 INDEX CODE: 107.00, 113.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect temporary duty (TDY) in Vietnam, and entitlement to the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM). ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00026

    Original file (BC-2011-00026.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFPC/DPAPP verified the applicant served at Kadena Air Base (AB), Japan, from 20 Sep 67 to 22 Mar 68, for a total of six months and four days. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The documentation provided to date clearly shows flight time during both TDYs, in 67-68 and 68-69. Someone must know KC-135 crew chiefs flew with their aircraft on most missions at that time.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03150

    Original file (BC-2003-03150.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    His CRSC application was disapproved on 3 Sep 03 based on the fact that although his DVA service-connected medical conditions exceeded the 60% rating, his PTSD was determined to be insufficiently documented and was not rated. Even though he did not receive any of the medals or commendations considered to be supportive of stressors and combat exposure, the DVA conceded to his stressful events as due to his duty as a combat photographer. Exhibit H. Letter, Applicant, dated 27 Sep 04.