Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01661
Original file (BC-2004-01661.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2004-01661
            INDEX CODE:  108.07
            COUNSEL:  NONE
            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  25 Nov 05

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His service-connected medical conditions, tinnitus and  dermatophytosis,  be
assessed as combat related in order to qualify for  compensation  under  the
Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Documentation  contained  in  his  Department  of  Veterans'  Affairs  (DVA)
records substantiate  that  his  tinnitus  and  dermatophytosis  are  combat
related.

In support of his request, applicant provided documentation associated  with
his CRSC application.  His complete  submission,  with  attachments,  is  at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant served as an enlisted member in the Regular  Army  from  6 Aug  41
through 23 Jun 42.  He was appointed a  second  lieutenant  in  the  Regular
Army on 24 Jun 42.  He served in the Air Reserves,  the  Reserve  Air  Corps
and the Regular Air Force.  He was progressively promoted to  the  grade  of
colonel, having assumed that grade effective and with a date of rank  of  15
Mar 62.  On 30 Apr 66, he voluntarily retired  for  years  of  service.   He
served 23 years, 3 months, and 10 days on active duty

Available DVA records reflect a combined compensable rating of 100% for  his
unfitting conditions.  His CRSC application was  disapproved  on  6  Feb  04
based upon the fact  that  his  service-connected  medical  conditions  were
determined not to be combat-related.   He  was  subsequently  approved  CRSC
compensation for his impaired hearing, rated at 100%.

_________________________________________________________________



AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPD recommends denial.  DPPD states a review of his  service  and  DVA
medical records  show  his  tinnitus  and  dermatophytosis  are  not  combat
related.  In order for  tinnitus  to  qualify  for  CRSC  evidence  must  be
present to show the condition manifested while  in  service.   There  is  no
documentation of tinnitus during his service.   His  records  do  not  show,
while in service, a combat-related event or  events  that  were  the  direct
cause of his dermatophytosis disability.

The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on  1  Jul
04 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, this office  has
received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  We note that the  applicant  is  currently
receiving CRSC compensation at the maximum rate  of  100%  and  approval  of
CRSC for his tinnitus and dermatophytosis would not result  in  an  increase
in compensation.  However,  in  the  event  his  impaired  hearing  were  to
improve resulting in a reduced DVA rating, his CRSC compensation would  then
be  based  on   the   ratings   of   other   CRSC   approved   disabilities.
Unfortunately, after a thorough review of the available evidence of  record,
it is our opinion that the service-connected  tinnitus  and  dermatophytosis
were not incurred as the direct result of armed conflict, while  engaged  in
hazardous service, in the performance of duty  under  conditions  simulating
war, or through an instrumentality of war, and  therefore,  do  not  qualify
for compensation under  the  CRSC  Act.   We  agree  with  the  opinion  and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility  and  adopt
its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that  the  applicant  has  not
been the victim of an error or injustice.  In the  absence  of  evidence  to
the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting  the  relief
sought in this application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2004-
01661 in Executive Session on 1 Jun 05, under  the  provisions  of  AFI  36-
2603:

      Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
      Mr. Christopher Carey, Member
      Mr. James W. Russell III, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 18 May 04, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 23 Jun 04.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Jul 04.




                                   THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
                                   Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01667

    Original file (BC-2004-01667.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPPD states a review of his service and DVA medical records show his service-connected conditions are not combat related. DVA files show his loss of both feet were the result of a stroke. This clearly states there is no direct cause between his Purple Heart injury to his right shoulder and his back strain.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02547

    Original file (BC-2004-02547.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02547 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 20 Feb 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, arteriosclerotic heart disease, dermatophytosis, flat foot condition, and residuals of cold injury (both feet), be assessed as combat related in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03204

    Original file (BC-2004-03204.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPPD states a review of his service and DVA medical records show his traumatic arthritis, hypertension, and dermatophytosis are not combat related. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 10 Nov 04 for review and comment within 30 days. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03925

    Original file (BC-2004-03925.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His arthritis of the hips claim was actually a claim for bilateral total hips with arthritis. A review of his service and DVA medical records show his arthritis and degenerative arthritis are not combat related. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant responded and reiterated that his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01134

    Original file (BC-2004-01134.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    He served 28 years and 13 days on active duty Current DVA records reflect a combined compensable rating of 60% for his unfitting conditions. DPPD states a review of his service and DVA medical records show his paralysis of the ulnar nerve is not combat related. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00970

    Original file (BC-2004-00970.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, applicant provided a personal statement, documentation extracted from his medical records and documentation associated with his CRSC application. DPPD states a review of his service and DVA records does not show that his conditions are combat related. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice;...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01218

    Original file (BC-2004-01218.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01218 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: Not Indicated _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, anxiety disorder and sinusitis, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03817

    Original file (BC-2004-03817.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant's service records cannot be located. DPPD states a review of his service and DVA medical records show his duodenal ulcers, impaired hearing, and tinnitus, are not combat related. His records do show he suffered hearing loss while in service; however, impaired hearing and tinnitus cannot be considered combat related unless incidental to a combat related event or due to documented, continual and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01933

    Original file (BC-2004-01933.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPPD states a review of his service and DVA medical records show his duodenal ulcer, back injury, quadruple heart bypass, and tinnitus are not combat related. For duodenal ulcer to qualify for CRSC, it must be presumptive to POW internment and so stated in the applicable rating decision. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02593

    Original file (BC-2005-02593.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02593 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 28 DEC 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, impaired hearing and tinnitus, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation...