RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02492
INDEX CODE: 100.00
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 9 FEB 2009
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reenlistment eligibility code of 2X [first-term, second-term,
or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under
the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)] be changed to an RE code
which will allow him to reenlist in the Air Force.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He has never been derelict in the performance of his duties. He
received two Air Force Good Conduct Medals during his career, which
serves as proof that he was not derelict in his duty performance.
In support of his appeal, applicant submitted a copy of his
DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty,
issued on 16 August 2006.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.
___________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 17 March 1999 for a
period of six years at the rank of airman basic. He was
progressively promoted to the rank of senior airman with an
effective date and date of rank (DOR) of 30 August 2001.
On 31 May 2002, applicant extended his enlistment for a period of
16 months to qualify for an overseas permanent change of station
(PCS) assignment.
On 11 May 2006, applicant’s supervisor initiated an AF Form 418,
Selective Reenlistment Program Consideration, and non-recommended
him for continued service. On that same date, applicant’s
commander concurred with the recommendation and denied his
reenlistment. The applicant acknowledged receipt of the
commander’s intent and on 15 May 2006, initialed his intent to
appeal the decision. On 29 June 2006, applicant extended his
enlistment for a period of one month to process an SRP appeal. On
10 July 2006, the appeal authority denied applicant’s appeal and he
acknowledged the decision on 17 July 2006.
On 16 August 2006, applicant was honorably released from active
duty under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, and transferred to the
Air Force Reserve, by reason of completion of required active
service, and was issued an RE code of 2X. He was credited with
7 years and 5 months of active duty service, including 2 months and
25 days of foreign service.
On 25 February 2007, applicant was honorably discharged from the
Air Force Reserve under the provisions of AFI 36-3209, and
furnished a DD Form 256AF.
___________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPAE reviewed this application and recommended denial,
stating, in part, after a review of the personnel record, they
found no error or injustice to support the change requested. The
applicant’s commander as the authority on recommendations for
reenlistment or non-reenlistment of squadron members, recommended
non-reenlistment of the applicant and the appeal authority agreed
with the recommendation.
HQ AFPC/DPPAE’s complete evaluation, with attachments, is at
Exhibit C.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 14 September 2007 for review and comment within 30 days. As of
this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit
D).
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. Applicant’s
contentions are duly noted; however, we are not persuaded that he
has been the victim of an error or injustice. At the time members
are separated from the Air Force, they are furnished an RE code
predicated upon the quality of their service and the circumstances
of their separation. After receiving the commander’s decision,
applicant appealed this decision; however, his request was denied.
As a result, we believe the applicant was afforded every
opportunity in the appeal process and has not provided any evidence
to sufficiently convince the Board to override the commander’s
earlier decision. Applicant’s RE code of 2X accurately reflects
that he was considered but not selected for reenlistment under the
Selective Reenlistment Program. After a thorough review of the
evidence of record, we believe that given the circumstances
surrounding the applicant’s separation, the RE code issued was in
accordance with the governing instruction. Therefore, in the
absence of persuasive evidence to the contrary, we find no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
___________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2007-02492 in Executive Session on 25 October 2007, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. Kathleen F. Graham, Panel Chair
Ms. Karen A. Holloman, Member
Mr. Wallace F. Beard Jr., Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 1 Jul 07, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, dated 13 Aug 07, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 Sep 07.
KATHLEEN F. GRAHAM
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01569
Applicant believes with all of the support documentation in his case, he is a very valuable asset to the Air Force In support of his appeal, applicant submitted a personal statement; extracts from his military personnel record, including copies of his performance reports and AF IMT 418s, along with several letters of character reference. Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. Applicant’s commander concurred and denied his reenlistment.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00369
As of this date, this office has received no response. We find no evidence of error in this case and after thoroughly reviewing the documentation that has been submitted in support of applicant's appeal, we do not believe he has suffered from an injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00345
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, dated 1 Mar 05. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR dated 18 Mar 05. RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2005-00345 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to , be corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02609
Applicant was discharged from the Air Force on 28 May 2004 under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, Completion of Active Service, with an honorable discharge. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. JAMES W. RUSSELL III Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2005-02609 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01413
A review of her EPR’s reflects that her promotion recommendation during two performance reporting periods was 2 – “Not recommended for promotion at this time” and a third EPR of 3 – “Consider.” On 22 December 1993, her commander concurred with the non-recommendation of her supervisor and denied her reenlistment. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01955
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01955 INDEX CODE: 110.00, 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2X be changed to allow eligibility to reenlist in the Air Force. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS recommends...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03560
The applicant was not recommended for reenlistment under the SRP and received an RE code of 2X. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 14 Feb 03 for review and comment within 30 days. Although the applicant’s records lack documentation of the specific reasons that he was denied reenlistment, we believe that...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02616
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02616 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation and reenlistment codes be changed to allow him to enlist in the Air National Guard. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS states they believe the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00568
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00568 INDEX NUMBER: 110.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Separation Code of “JBK,” discharged after completion of required service, be changed. Her “2X” Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code, “First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00555
His complete submittion is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPAE recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that the applicant has not satisfactorily indicated the commander’s action to deny reenlistment was inappropriate or not in compliance with Air Force policy. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice to warrant upgrading the applicant’s...