RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02609
INDEX CODE: 112.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE: 21 February 2007
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2X be changed.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He received an honorable discharge and did not receive any letters of
reprimand or Articles 15.
In support of the appeal, applicant submits a personal statement, 12
character references and documents pertaining to his military
servicie.
Applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 29 March 2000 in the
grade of airman basic for a period of four years. He was
progressively promoted to the grade of senior airman.
On 22 March 2004, applicant’s commander completed an AF 418, Selective
Reenlistment Program Consideration, on the applicant. Due to
significant financial problems, poor fitness level, and the
commander’s concern with applicant’s ability to assume higher rank, he
did not recommend applicant for reenlistment. The applicant appealed
the commander’s decision, however, on 19 April 2004, his appeal was
denied.
Applicant was discharged from the Air Force on 28 May 2004 under the
provisions of AFI 36-3208, Completion of Active Service, with an
honorable discharge. He served four years and two months on active
duty. He received a reenlistment eligibility code of 2X, “First-term,
second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for
reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP).”
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPAE recommends denial. They conducted a review of his
personnel record and there was nothing to support the change
requested. The commander as the authority on recommending
reenlistment or non-reenlistment of squadron members, recommended non-
reenlistment of this applicant.
A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 23 September 2005, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded
to the applicant for review and response within 30 days. As of this
date, no response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error or injustice. In this respect, we note the
offenses committed by the applicant were minor and in view of his
achievements since his separation, we believe the applicant should be
provided the opportunity to apply for enlistment in the armed
services. Applicant will be required to meet all physical standards
as is required by regulation. Whether or not he is successful will
depend on the needs of the service and our recommendation in no way
guarantees that he will be allowed to return to the Air Force or any
branch of the service. Therefore, we recommend that applicant’s
record be corrected to reflect an RE code of “3K” (Reserved for use by
HQ AFPC or the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records
(AFBCMR) when no other reenlistment eligibility code applies or is
appropriate).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that at the time of his
discharge on 28 May 2004, he was issued a Reenlistment Eligibility
(RE) code of “3K.”
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 17 November 2005, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. James W. Russell III, Panel Chair
Ms. Kathleen B. O’Sullivan, Member
Ms. LeLoy W. Cottrell, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2005-02609 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 16 Jul 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 6 Sep 05.
Exhibit D. SAF/MRBR Letter, dated 23 Sep 05.
JAMES W. RUSSELL III
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2005-02609
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that at the time of
his discharge on 28 May 2004, he was issued a Reenlistment Eligibility
(RE) code of “3K.”
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00345
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, dated 1 Mar 05. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR dated 18 Mar 05. RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2005-00345 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to , be corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03778
In accordance with the Date of Separation (DOS) Rollback Program, the applicant was honorably discharged on 27 July 2004, under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 (Completion of Required Active Service). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that since the applicant was discharged under the DOS Rollback Program and was serving on the Control Roster, his separation code of JBK...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01989
A resume of applicant’s available enlisted performance reports (EPR) profile follows: PERIOD CLOSING OVERALL EVALUATION 10 Nov 91 4 23 Dec 92 4 23 Dec 93 4 15 Aug 94 2 (Referral Rpt) 15 Aug 95 2 (Referral Rpt) On 14 Feb 96, applicant was honorably released from active duty under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, by reason of completion of required active service, and was issued an RE code of 2X. RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2005-01989 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00432
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00432 INDEX NUMBER: 100.06, 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 9 AUGUST 2006 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 2X be changed to a code that will permit reentry into the military. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02020
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-02020 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation code of “LBK” (completion of required active service, and denied reenlistment with half separation pay) be changed. However, after considering the evidence provided, the Board determined it was insufficient...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03256
Therefore, we have no basis to conclude that the corresponding RE code that was assigned at the time of his separation does not accurately reflect the circumstances of his separation. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02137
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to applicant on 21 Nov 03 for review and response. No evidence has been provided which would lead us to believe that the applicant’s evaluators were unable to render an unbiased evaluation of his performance or that the ratings on the contested report were based on...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02352
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02352 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of “2X” be changed to reflect a code that would make him eligible for reserve status in the Air Force Reserve or Air National Guard. This is evident by his serving as a correctional officer...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03392
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004- 03392 INDEX CODE: 100.06, 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 6 MAY 2006 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 3K be changed to a more favorable 1-series RE code. To date, they have not received any additional documentation or had any contact...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01027
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 03-01027 INDEX CODE: 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the SRP) be changed to allow reenlistment. Prior to 16 October 1998, his denial of reenlistment,...