RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00555
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of “2X” be changed to “3A” to allow
his entry into the Air Force Reserve.
_________________________________________________________________
THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The applicant did not present any contentions. His complete submittion is
at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 23 June 1993 for a
period of four years.
A Record Review Report of Individual Personnel (RIP), prepared 24 July
1996, indicates the applicant was ineligible to reenlist based on RE code
“2X,” 2nd term or career amn not selected under Selective Reenlistment
Program (SRP).
During the period in question, he received two Enlisted Performance Reports
(EPRs) with overall promotion recommendations of 3 (Consider) and 5
(Immediate Promotion).
He was honorably discharged on 23 August 1996, under the provisions of AFI
36-3208 (Completion of Required Active Service). He completed 3 years, 2
months, and 1 day of active service. He was issued RE code 2X.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPAE recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that
the applicant has not satisfactorily indicated the commander’s action to
deny reenlistment was inappropriate or not in compliance with Air Force
policy. The applicant’s records reveal that he performed his duties in a
manner that generally met Air Force standards according to his EPRs;
however, his last report indicated that with an increase in initiative, he
could improve his potential for advancement in his military career. He
required supervision and follow-up to ensure task completion. Based on his
duty performance, his commander had the authority to nonselect him for
reenlistment.
The AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 18 April 2003 for review and response within 30 days. However, as of
this date, this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice to warrant upgrading the applicant’s RE
Code. In this respect, we note that the applicant’s discharge appears to be
in compliance with the governing Air Force Instruction in effect at the
time of his separation and that he was afforded all the rights to which
entitled. Furthermore, he provides no evidence that the commander’s
decision to deny his reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program
(SRP) was inappropriate or that the assigned RE Code reflecting that he was
considered but not selected for reenlistment under the SRP was in error or
unjust. There being insufficient evidence to the contrary, we find no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2003-00555
in Executive Session on 5 June 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Robert S. Boyd, Panel Chair
Ms. Kathleen F. Graham, Member
Mr. James A. Wolffe, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 10 Feb 03, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 14 Apr 03.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 18 Apr 03.
ROBERT S. BOYD
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01955
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01955 INDEX CODE: 110.00, 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2X be changed to allow eligibility to reenlist in the Air Force. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS recommends...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03340
The applicant has not provided sufficient evidence that the commander’s decision to deny him reenlistment was inappropriate or not in compliance with Air Force policy. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 31 Jan 03 for review and comment within 30 days. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03560
The applicant was not recommended for reenlistment under the SRP and received an RE code of 2X. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 14 Feb 03 for review and comment within 30 days. Although the applicant’s records lack documentation of the specific reasons that he was denied reenlistment, we believe that...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01193
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01193 INDEX CODE: 100.03, 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of “2X” be changed. The DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01027
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 03-01027 INDEX CODE: 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the SRP) be changed to allow reenlistment. Prior to 16 October 1998, his denial of reenlistment,...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01262
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 24 August 1994, for a period of four years in the grade of airman first class (E-3). The applicant has provided no evidence showing that his assigned RE code is in error or contrary to the prevailing instruction. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence...
Unfortunately, the AF Form 418 denying applicant reenlistment is not on file in his military personnel record. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 16 Oct 98, w/atchs; Letter, dated 2 Oct 98; Statement BARBARA A. WESTGATE Panel Chair AFBCMR 98-00035 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02616
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02616 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation and reenlistment codes be changed to allow him to enlist in the Air National Guard. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS states they believe the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00382
On 11 January 1989, his supervisor did not recommend him for reenlistment. Applicant’s performance profile follows: PERIOD ENDING EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 14 Apr 87 8 1 Dec 87 7 1 Dec 88 7 _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPAE recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that the applicant has not provided any additional information to indicate that his RE code was erroneously or unfairly assessed to his file. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02137
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to applicant on 21 Nov 03 for review and response. No evidence has been provided which would lead us to believe that the applicant’s evaluators were unable to render an unbiased evaluation of his performance or that the ratings on the contested report were based on...