RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01569
INDEX CODE: 110.02
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 21 NOV 2008
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2X (first-term, second-
term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment
under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) be changed to a
favorable (normal separation) code.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He served honorably for four and one-half years and now it is time
for him to reenlist. He received several administrative letters;
two letters of counseling (LOCs) in 2006, a letter of reprimand
(LOR) in 2007, leading to an unfavorable information file (UIF),
control-roster, referral enlisted performance report (EPR), and
denial of reenlistment. He believes the actions taken against him
by his commander and first sergeant were unjust.
In his personal statement, applicant submitted a detailed
explanation of the events and circumstances leading up to the
events which subsequently resulted in his RE code of 2X. The
actions taken against him do not reflect who he is. He has always
tried to be the best airman and has performed his job well, and has
been the go-to person for any information that relates to his job.
He has made many sacrifices since joining the military, including
separation from his military spouse due to assignments,
deployments, temporary duty (TDY), and working after hours and
weekends, which has led to a lot of stress in his life. Applicant
believes with all of the support documentation in his case, he is a
very valuable asset to the Air Force
In support of his appeal, applicant submitted a personal statement;
extracts from his military personnel record, including copies of
his performance reports and AF IMT 418s, along with several letters
of character reference.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
___________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 21 Mar 07, applicant’s supervisor initiated an AF Form 418 and
non-recommended him for continued service. Applicant’s commander
concurred and denied his reenlistment. The applicant acknowledged
the commander’s intent and on 26 Mar 07, he notified his commander
of his intent to appeal the decision. On 24 Apr 07, the appeal
authority denied applicant’s appeal and he acknowledged the denial
on 25 Apr 07.
On 1 Jul 07, applicant was discharged in the grade of senior
airman.
___________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPAE reviewed this application and recommended denial
stating, in part, commanders have total selective reenlistment
program selection or non-selection, as long as the airman is
eligible for consideration. Commander’s make selection or non-
selection based on EPRs, unfavorable information from any
substantiated source, the airman’s willingness to comply with Air
Force standards, and the airman’s ability (or lack of) to meet
required training and duty performance levels.
HQ AFPC/DPPAE’s complete evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit
C.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 13 July 2007 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this
date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of
the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the
case. At the time members are separated from the Air Force, they
are furnished an RE code predicated upon the quality of their
service and circumstances of their separation. Applicant’s RE code
of 2X accurately reflects that he was not selected for reenlistment
under SRP. After a thorough review of the evidence of record,
including the letters of character reference submitted in the
applicant’s behalf, we believe that given the circumstances
surrounding the applicant’s separation, the RE code issued was in
accordance with the governing directives. Therefore, in the
absence of persuasive evidence to the contrary, we find no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
___________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2007-01569 in Executive Session on 18 September 2007, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
Mr. Patrick C. Daugherty, Member
Mr. Joseph D. Yount, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 1 May 07, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, dated 6 Jul 07, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 Jul 07.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Chair
Unfortunately, the AF Form 418 denying applicant reenlistment is not on file in his military personnel record. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 16 Oct 98, w/atchs; Letter, dated 2 Oct 98; Statement BARBARA A. WESTGATE Panel Chair AFBCMR 98-00035 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01955
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01955 INDEX CODE: 110.00, 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2X be changed to allow eligibility to reenlist in the Air Force. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS recommends...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01413
A review of her EPR’s reflects that her promotion recommendation during two performance reporting periods was 2 – “Not recommended for promotion at this time” and a third EPR of 3 – “Consider.” On 22 December 1993, her commander concurred with the non-recommendation of her supervisor and denied her reenlistment. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00369
As of this date, this office has received no response. We find no evidence of error in this case and after thoroughly reviewing the documentation that has been submitted in support of applicant's appeal, we do not believe he has suffered from an injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00345
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, dated 1 Mar 05. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR dated 18 Mar 05. RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2005-00345 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to , be corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-02492
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02492 INDEX CODE: 100.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 9 FEB 2009 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility code of 2X [first-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)] be...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00931
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00931 INDEX CODE: 110.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 26 September 2008 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry Code (RE) of 2X (First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)),...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2003-02219
Applicant’s military personnel records reveal that, on 8 March 1997, the applicant was released from active duty and transferred to the Air Force Reserve under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 (completion of active required service). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: HQ AFPC/DPPAOR states the applicant’s service dates and date of rank to the grade of E-4 are correct. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit F).
On 1 Dec 97, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 (Completion of Required Active Service) with an honorable characterization of service in the grade of senior airman with an RE code of 2X (First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP). Unfortunately, the AF Form 418 denying applicant reenlistment is not on file in his military personnel record. Exhibit E. Letter fr applicant,...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01528 INDEX CODE: 100 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of “2C” on the DD Form 214, “Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty,” be changed to “1J” to allow enlistment into the Hawaii Air National Guard. We have thoroughly reviewed the evidence...