Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02980
Original file (BC-2005-02980.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:                       DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2005-02980
                                             INDEX CODE:  100.00
                                             COUNSEL:  NONE

                                             HEARING DESIRED:  NO


MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  1 April 2007


________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

The time he spent in Korea and on Iwo Jima be reflected on his DD Form  214,
Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge,  so  that
he can prove his eligibility for membership in the Veterans of Foreign  Wars
(VFW).

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He served with the 6000th Air Base Squadron  at  Fuchu  Honshu,  Japan  from
1956 to 1958 in ground radio maintenance.  During this  time,  he  was  sent
Temporary Duty (TDY) to Iwo Jima for approximately 1 week and to  Korea  for
5 weeks to install and maintain radio equipment.  Since  he  was  there  for
more than 30 days, he is eligible for membership in the  VFW.   However,  if
he is unable to verify his foreign service, he will be  removed  from  their
membership rolls.

In support of the appeal, applicant  submits  his  personal  statements  and
five statements attesting to the fact that on 4 June  2005,  he  showed  8mm
films of his tour of duty in Japan, Iwo Jima, and Korea, at VFW Post 10127

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant is a former enlisted member of the Regular Air Force  that  served
on active duty from 30 December 1954 through 16 September 1958, as a  ground
communications equipment repairman.   During  this  period  he  completed  1
year, 11 months, and 18 days of foreign service.

________________________________________________________________


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPAPP recommends the application be denied and states,  in  part,  that
there is no documentation to verify applicant was TDY while assigned to  the
6000th ABRON, at Fuchu Honshu, Japan, from 1956 to 1958.

The AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A complete copy of the evaluation was  forwarded  to  the  applicant  on  23
December 2005, for review and comment, within 30 days.  However, as of  this
date, no response has been received by this office.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest  of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of  the  applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the  case;  however,  we  agree
with the opinion and recommendation of  the  Air  Force  office  of  primary
responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion  that
the applicant has not been the victim of an error or  injustice.   We  note,
there  are  no  documents  that  verify  any  TDY  to  Korea  or  Iwo  Jima.
Therefore,  in  the  absence  of  evidence  to  the  contrary,  we  find  no
compelling  basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief   sought   in   this
application.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered  Docket  Number  BC-2005-02980
in Executive Session on 27 April 2006, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

                       Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Panel Chair
                       Ms. Sharon B. Seymour, Member
                       Ms. Jean A. Reynolds, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 20 Sep 05, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 12 Dec 05.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 23 Dec 05.




                                   RICHARD A. PETERSON
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03721

    Original file (BC-2006-03721.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or an injustice. The applicant did not provide any documentation showing he was assigned or TDY to Korea. There is no documentation in the applicant’s military records to reflect he was assigned or TDY to Korea.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03640

    Original file (BC-2005-03640.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. The applicant’s military record indicates he was assigned to Sembach Air Base, Germany from 1 February 1956 to 7 September 1956 and, Landstuhl, Germany, from 8 September 1956 to 29 December 1958. After reviewing the evidence of record and the applicant’s submission, we find that other than the applicant’s assertions, we have no evidence to indicate his entitlement to any of the requested decorations.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02634

    Original file (BC-2005-02634.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    --The Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM) is awarded to members who: (1) served for six months in South Vietnam during the period 1 Mar 61 and 28 Mar 73; (2) served outside the geographical limits of South Vietnam and contributed direct combat support to the RVN Armed Forces for an aggregate of six months--only members who meet the criteria established for the AFEM (Vietnam) or the VSM during the period required are considered to have contributed direct combat support to the RVN Armed...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02429

    Original file (BC-2004-02429.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, applicant provided a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 24 Sep 04, w/atch. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Oct 04.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03798

    Original file (BC-2004-03798.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, based on the evidence presented, we do not find an adequate basis to conclude the applicant met the eligibility criteria for award of either the Korean War Service Medal or the Korean Defense Service Medal. Novel, Panel Chair Mr. Clarence D. Long III, Member Mr. Patrick C. Daugherty, Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 8 Dec 04, w/atchs. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Feb 05.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02918

    Original file (BC-2005-02918.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFPC/DPAPP further noted the applicant’s statement he was on deployment with 415 airmen, and 30 of those airmen got bumped off their rotator and had to stay in Atlanta, Georgia for three additional days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). _________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD: A majority of the panel finds insufficient evidence of error or injustice and recommends the application be denied.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02919

    Original file (BC-2005-02919.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was deployed with 415 other airmen, of which 385 received short tour credit. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). _________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD: A majority of the panel finds insufficient evidence of error or injustice and recommends the application be denied.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01279

    Original file (BC-2012-01279.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, it does not reflect the entire time he was TDY in Korea. The applicant’s response to the Air Force evaluation is noted, however, we find no evidence that his records should be corrected to reflect any service time beyond that currently reflected on his DD Form 214. ________________________________________________________________ 3 Panel Chair Member Member The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 13 Sep 2012 and 3 Oct 2012, under...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00373

    Original file (BC-2005-00373.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 6 November 2001, he was notified by AFPC/DPPPRA that the documentation he provided did not show that he was TDY in Vietnam for 30 consecutive or 60 nonconsecutive days, or stationed in Vietnam for six months. After a thorough review of the available evidence, the Board is not persuaded that the applicant is entitled to the award of the Vietnam Service Medal. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01716

    Original file (BC-2011-01716.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    While serving with the 6988th he went on temporary duty (TDY) to both Korea and Vietnam. By letter, dated 28 November 2011, AFPC/DPSIDRA, advised that after a thorough review of the applicant’s official military personnel record, provided documentation, and with the assistance of the Directorate of Assignments, they were able to verify the applicant’s entitlement to the Korean Defense Service medal (KDSM) for his temporary duty (TDY) at Kwang Ju Air Base, Korea, from 4 May 1971 to 8 June...