Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00373
Original file (BC-2005-00373.doc) Auto-classification: Denied


                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2005-00373
            INDEX CODE:      107.00
      XXXXXXXXXXXXX    COUNSEL:  NONE

      XXXXXXXXXXXXX    HEARING DESIRED:  NO

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  6 AUG 2006

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM).

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He served four months temporary duty (TDY) in Okinawa, Korea,  Taipei,
Guam, Johnson Island, Hawaii, Philippines and  Vietnam.   He  believes
that the time he served in Guam, Philippines and in Vietnam  qualifies
him for award of the VSM.

In support of his request, the applicant submits a copy  of  a  letter
from his Congressman and Defense Finance and Accounting Service.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force as an airman basic  on
18 July 1960 for a period of 4 years.  During the period in  question,
he was an airman first class serving as a Telephone Installation  Team
member at Tachikawa, AB, Japan.

He was discharged with an Honorable Discharge on 7 July 1964.  He  had
3 years, 11 months and 20 days of total active Service.

His DD Form 214 reflects award of the Air Force  Good  Conduct  Medal,
National Defense Service Medal, 1 year, 5 months and  26 days  Foreign
Service.

On 27 July 2001, the applicant requested his records be  corrected  to
show he received  the  VSM  and  the  Purple  Heart  (PH)  Medal.   On
6 November 2001, he was notified by AFPC/DPPPRA that the documentation
he provided did not show that he was TDY in Vietnam for 30 consecutive
or 60 nonconsecutive days, or stationed in Vietnam for six months.  He
did not provide any documentation to show that he  was  wounded  as  a
direct  result  of  enemy  action  and  they  could  not  verify   his
eligibility for the PH or the VSM.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial.  DPAPP states that  the  applicant  does
not have any documents that support his claim for TDYs to Vietnam.  In
addition, his master personnel record confirms  there  are  no  travel
vouchers of TDY orders or any other documents that show any  TDY  into
Vietnam.   He  has  already  been  advised  by  the  Defense   Finance
Accounting Service that they only keep copies of a member’s pay record
for six  years  and  three  months.   His  pay  record  was  destroyed
according to their policy.

The AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the  applicant  on
18 Feb 2005 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of  this  date,
no response has been received by this office.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies  provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.    The application was not timely filed;  however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice.  After a thorough review  of  the
available evidence, the Board is not persuaded that the  applicant  is
entitled to the award of the Vietnam Service Medal.  The Board  agrees
with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary
responsibility and  adopts  its  rationale  as  the  basis  for  their
conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an  error  or
injustice.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, the
Board finds no compelling  basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief
sought in this application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered Docket  Number  BC-2005-
00373 in Executive Session on 26 April 2005, under the  provisions  of
AFI 36-2603:

                 Ms. B. J. White-Olson, Panel Chair
                 Ms. Janet I. Hassan, Member
                 Mr. Grover L. Dunn, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

      Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 25 Jan 05.
      Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
      Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPPR, dated 15 Feb 05.
      Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 18 Feb 05.



      B. J. WHITE-OLSON
      Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00118

    Original file (BC-2005-00118.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00118 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 11 JUN 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to show he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The Board agrees with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01443

    Original file (BC-2005-01443.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01443 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 03 NOV 2006 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: It appears the applicant is requesting his DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect award of the Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, and award of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01030

    Original file (BC-2005-01030.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01030 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Yes MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 27 Sep 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 reflect award of the Joint Service Commendation Medal (JSCM), the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with Valor (AFOUA w/V), the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM), the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00372

    Original file (BC-2011-00372.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFPC/DPAPP was able to verify the following overseas service and his DD Form 214 will be administratively corrected to reflect 25 days of Foreign Service. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial for award of the VSM. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2011-00373 in Executive Session on 9 Jun 11, under the provisions of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00026

    Original file (BC-2011-00026.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFPC/DPAPP verified the applicant served at Kadena Air Base (AB), Japan, from 20 Sep 67 to 22 Mar 68, for a total of six months and four days. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The documentation provided to date clearly shows flight time during both TDYs, in 67-68 and 68-69. Someone must know KC-135 crew chiefs flew with their aircraft on most missions at that time.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01654

    Original file (BC-2006-01654.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Credit for service in Vietnam requires a member to have served (on ground or landed at least one day) in Vietnam.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01006

    Original file (BC-2005-01006.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his appeal, applicant submitted a letter, dated 7 Feb 05; a copy of DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, dated 11 Aug 70; copy of VSM criteria, and an extract from the internet on Westover Air Force Base. ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPAPP reviewed this application and recommended denial, stating, in part, that there were no documents that confirm any flights over...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01539

    Original file (BC-2005-01539.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was TDY to Vietnam from 5 March 1966 through 10 April 1966, while working as a civilian for the National Security Agency. In addition, the Board notes the applicant served in a civilian capacity during his time in Vietnam, not as a military member and is, therefore, not entitled to the VSM. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00054

    Original file (BC 2014 00054.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, personnel serving in Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia in direct support of operations in Vietnam during the same time period were also eligible for the VSM. A thorough review of the applicant’s official military record did not locate any documentation verifying award of the VSM. The applicant provided TDY Order-Military, dated 24 Jan 67 assigning him to the 4133rd Bomb Wing (Provisional), Anderson Air Force Base (AFB), Guam; TDY Order-military, dated 22 Feb 68, assigning him to the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02660

    Original file (BC-2005-02660.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    We are not ungrateful or unappreciative of his service to this nation; however, absent the presence of official documentation showing that he served in the Republic of Vietnam, the applicant's request cannot be favorably considered. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a...