Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02429
Original file (BC-2004-02429.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2004-02429
            INDEX NUMBER:  107.00

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM).

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was in Vietnam between 1962 and 1964  with  the  366th  Tactical
Fighter Wing (TAC).  Due to the secrecy of the missions he  has  no
records to support his claim.

In support of  his  request,  applicant  provided  a  copy  of  his
DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report  of  Transfer
or Discharge).

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.

___________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 21 Mar 57.   He  was
honorably discharged on 20 Jul 59.  He reenlisted on 21 Jul 59  and
was discharged on 7 May 65 for unfitness, with a general discharge.
 He was credited with a total of 8 years, 1 month, and 17  days  of
active military service.

He  was  awarded  the  Good  Conduct  Medal,  Small   Arms   Expert
Marksmanship Ribbon, Air Force Longevity  Service  Award,  and  Air
Force Outstanding Unit Award.

The Foreign  Service  on  AF  Form  7  (Airman’s  Military  Record)
reflects he was assigned in Iwo Jima from 25 Sep 57 –  24  Aug  58,
Japan from 25 Aug 58 – 25 Aug 60, and Okinawa  from  30  Jun  62  –
5 Dec 64.

___________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ AFPC/DPAPP recommended denial and states, in part, there are  no
source documents confirming service  in  Vietnam  in  his  records.
Applicant  was  asked  to  provide  documentation  to  confirm  the
missions into Vietnam.  To date he has not responded.

A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C.

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 1 Oct 04, a copy of the Air Force evaluation  was  forwarded  to
the applicant for review and response within 30 days.  As  of  this
date, no response has been received by this office.  (Exhibit D)

___________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient  relevant   evidence   has   been   presented   to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.   The  applicant’s
contentions are duly noted; however, without documentation  showing
specific times and locations of duty in Vietnam, we are  unable  to
verify his entitlement to the Vietnam Service Medal.  Therefore, in
the absence of evidence to the  contrary,  we  find  no  compelling
basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

___________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that  the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

___________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2004-
02429  in  Executive  Session  on  17  November  2004,  under   the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      Ms. Kathy L. Boockholdt, Panel Chair
      Mr. Wallace F. Beard Jr., Member
      Mr. Albert C. Ellett, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 27 Jul 04, w/atch.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 24 Sep 04, w/atch.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Oct 04.




                                   KATHY L. BOOCKHOLDT
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01030

    Original file (BC-2005-01030.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01030 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Yes MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 27 Sep 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 reflect award of the Joint Service Commendation Medal (JSCM), the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with Valor (AFOUA w/V), the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM), the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-1983-00317A

    Original file (BC-1983-00317A.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His personnel and medical records were not considered at the time of his discharge. On 8 November 1982, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied applicant’s request that his discharge be upgraded to honorable (Exhibit C). For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the application, and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01599

    Original file (BC-2004-01599.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01599 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon (SAEMR) and the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC). ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-01604

    Original file (BC-2008-01604.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-01604 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NOT INDICATED HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show his entitlement to the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) for his involvement in the 1958 Taiwan crisis. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02474

    Original file (BC-2004-02474.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his appeal, applicant submitted a copy of his DD Form 214, dated 25 Jan 74. Exhibit C. Letter, HQ ARPC/DPRFQ, dated 6 Oct 04. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 Oct 04.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01791

    Original file (BC-2010-01791.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Based on the available master personnel record, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 2 Aug 54 for a period of 4 years. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial, stating, in part, after a thorough review of the applicant’s personnel records, there was no mention of a TDY to Thailand in 1962 and the applicant did...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00408

    Original file (BC 2014 00408.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit E. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He served for a little less than four years because of hazardous missions flown in SEA. While the applicant has not provided conclusive evidence that he completed a TDY to Vietnam, it is our opinion the APR for the period ending 27 Sep 68 coupled with AFPS’s database appear to weigh more in favor of amending the applicant’s DD Form 214 to reflect award of the VSM with one Bronze Service Star...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01709

    Original file (BC 2014 01709.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01709 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He was on flying status as a crew chief. However, his records does not credit him with these flights He’s not certain how flight records are maintained; however, there should be records of crews flying to Vietnam during the aforementioned period. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AF/A3O-A1F recommends denial of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02915

    Original file (BC-2005-02915.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Public Law (PL) 92-425, which established the SBP on 21 Sep 72, authorized an enrollment period for retired members to elect SBP coverage. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit B. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-01731

    Original file (BC-2008-01731.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-01731 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NOT INDICATED HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show his entitlement to the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA), the National Defense Service Medal, the Air Force Overseas Service Ribbon Short Tour (AFOSR-ST), and the Air Force Longevity...