Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04105
Original file (BC-2002-04105.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2002-04105
            INDEX CODE:  100.00

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO


_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His records reflect that he was on temporary duty (TDY) to  Vietnam  from  1
to 17 October 1968.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)  diagnosed  him  as  having  Type  2
Diabetes.  Diabetes, stress and agent orange are life  threatening  to  him.
He indicates that he filed a claim and it was denied because his records  do
not reflect his time served in Vietnam.  He  was  stationed  with  XXX  AMS,
Davis Monthan AFB, AZ.

In support of his appeal, the applicant provided a personal statement.

Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

During the time period in question, the applicant enlisted  in  the  Regular
Air Force on 18 October 1964 in the grade of airman first class with a  date
of rank of 1 October 1962, for a period of four (4) years.

The applicant retired on 30 November 1976, in the grade of  staff  sergeant,
under the provisions of AFM 35-7.  He served 20 years and 19 days  of  total
active military service.

_________________________________________________________________





AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPAPP2 recommended denial.  They indicated that there is no  indication
in the applicant’s master  personnel  records  (MPR)  that  he  was  TDY  to
Vietnam.  He was previously advised on 30 October 1991,  that  no  documents
existed in his records that support his claim for service in Vietnam.

The evaluation, with attachment is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 7 February 2003, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to  the
applicant for review and response within 30  days.   As  of  this  date,  no
response has been received by this office.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law  or
regulations.

2.    The application was not timely filed; however, it is in  the  interest
of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to  demonstrate  the
existence of an error or injustice.   We  took  notice  of  the  applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the  case;  however,  we  agree
with the opinion and  recommendation  of  the  Air  Force  and  adopt  their
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant  has  not  been
the victim of an  error  or  injustice.   There  are  no  documents  in  the
applicant’s military personnel records that reflect that  he  was  stationed
or sent TDY to Vietnam during his tour of duty in the Air Force.   Moreover,
he has not submitted any documentation to support his assertion that he  was
TDY to Vietnam from 1 to 17 October 1968.  In view of the above finding,  we
find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought.

________________________________________________________________









THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of an error or an injustice; that the application  was  denied
without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the  application  will  only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2002-
04105 in Executive Session on 12 June 2003, under the provisions of AFI  36-
2603:

                 Mr. Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Vice Chair
                 Mr. Joseph A. Roj, Member
                 Ms. Cheryl Jacobson, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 20 December 2002, w/atchs.
   Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPAPP2, dated 6 February 2003,
               w/atch.
   Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 7 February 2003.



                       THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
                       Vice Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2002-04105A

    Original file (BC-2002-04105A.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 12 June 2003, the Board considered and denied the applicant’s request. A complete copy of the Record of Proceedings (ROP) is at Exhibit E. On 12 May 2004, the applicant submitted a request for reconsideration, indicating his DD Form 214 should indicate combat zone - Vietnam in October 1968. Exhibit F. DD Form 149, dated 12 May 2004, w/atchs.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2002-04105-3

    Original file (BC-2002-04105-3.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    SECOND ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-04105 INDEX CODE: 100.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, he requests his records reflect he was on temporary duty (TDY) to Vietnam from 1 to 17 October 1968. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03515

    Original file (BC-2002-03515.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03515 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect his Temporary Duties (TDYs) to Pope AFB and Travis AFB during the Cuban Missile Crisis, and his TDY to Vietnam from Hickam AFB in 1963. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | 0201994

    Original file (0201994.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VA told him to bring in his TDY records which he doesn’t have. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP2 recommends the application be denied. While the possibility exists that the applicant may have been in Vietnam at some time, he has provided no evidence substantiating he was deployed to Vietnam for any specific dates or length of time.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0201117

    Original file (0201117.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was requested to provide any documents from his personal files in support of his application and he has not responded to the request. They recommend the requested relief be denied (Exhibit D). There was no evidence in the applicant's records to support he served in Korea or Vietnam.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01693

    Original file (BC-2004-01693.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01693 INDEX CODE: 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 be corrected to give him credit for time spent in Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia while he was assigned to Thailand. He knows that there are no official records that state that he spent time in Vietnam, Laos,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03459

    Original file (BC-2002-03459.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no documents in applicant’s Master Personnel Records that shows specific dates of service in the Gulf War. A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachment, is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 7 February 2003, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01452

    Original file (BC-2003-01452.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends denial. There is no indication in his records that he was TDY at any time while he was on active duty. Dean Yount, Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 17 Apr 03.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03334

    Original file (BC-2003-03334.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DPAPP2 evaluation is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states the Air Force sent him TDY to the country of Vietnam during October - November 1968 and he collected two months combat pay for the time spent there. The Air Force should have records of his TDY somewhere. __________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00489

    Original file (BC-2006-00489.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 30 Jun 06 (Exhibit D) for review and comment within 30 days. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion the service-connected medical conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were not incurred as the direct result of armed...