RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03515
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or
Discharge, be corrected to reflect his Temporary Duties (TDYs) to Pope AFB
and Travis AFB during the Cuban Missile Crisis, and his TDY to Vietnam from
Hickam AFB in 1963.
_________________________________________________________________
THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Public Law 106-419 provides compensation for Vietnam veterans serving time
in that country; however, he is being denied compensation because his DD
Form 214 does not reflect his TDY to Vietnam.
Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 12 January 1961, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force for a
period of four years. He was progressively promoted to the grade of airman
second class (E-3). However, as a result of nonjudicial punishment imposed
under Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), he was
reduced to the grade of airman third class (E-2), effective 28 February
1964.
He was released from active duty on 11 January 1965, and transferred to the
Air Force Reserve under the provisions of AFR 39-10 (Expiration of Term of
Service), after completion of four years of active service. The DD Form
214 issued in conjunction with his release from active duty indicates that
he completed 2 years, 1 month, and 29 days of foreign service.
An AF Form 7, Airman Military Record, indicates that he was assigned to
Hickam AFB, HI, from 3 August 1961 through 1 October 1963.
Block VII, Comments of Reporting Official, on AF Form 75, USAF Airman
Performance Report (APR), rendered for the period 12 January 1962 to 11
January 1963, while applicant was assigned to Hickam AFB, contains the
statement, “During the recent alert, [applicant] was one of the first to
volunteer his services and skill in accompanying and supporting aircraft
involved in the alert.”
On 11 January 1967, he was honorably discharged from the Air Force Reserve.
On 1 November 2000, Public Law 106-419, amended Title 38, United States
Code, to increase amounts of educational assistance for veterans under the
Montgomery GI Bill and to enhance programs providing educational benefits
under that title, and for other purposes.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPAPP2 recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that
there are no documents in the applicant’s records to reflect any TDYs to or
his participation in the Cuban Missile Crisis. He was asked to review his
personnel records to see if he might have any documents that could be used
to support his claim; however, he did not respond.
The AFPC/DPAPP2 evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 14 February 2003 for review and response within 30 days. However, as of
this date, this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. The applicant contends that he is being
denied compensation given to Vietnam Veterans under Public Law 106-419
because his DD Form 214 does not reflect his TDY to Vietnam. In addition,
his TDYs to Pope AFB and Travis AFB, during the Cuban Missile Crisis should
also be included on his DD Form 214. However, the evidence of record and
the applicant’s submission, do not contain any source documents that
confirm his completion of any TDYs and participation in the Cuban Missile
Crisis. The appropriate office of primary responsibility contacted the
applicant and requested he review his personnel records for any additional
supporting documentation; however, he has not responded. The personal
sacrifice the applicant endured for his country is noted and our decision
in no way diminishes the high regard we have for his service; however, the
applicant has failed to sustain his burden that his records are in error or
unjust. Hence, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the
relief sought.
4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been shown
that a personal appearance with or without counsel will materially add to
our understanding of the issues involved. Therefore, the request for a
hearing is not favorably considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2002-03515
in Executive Session on 8 May 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Vice Chair
Mr. James W. Russell, III, Member
Ms. Cheryl Jacobson, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 22 Oct 02.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPAPP2, dated 3 Feb 03, w/atch.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 Feb 03.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Vice Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02809
DPPPR states that he provided a copy of an order deploying him from Barksdale AFB on 9 Mar 59 for 90 days to APO NT 677 for a SAC rotational movement but he did not provide documentation to show the location of the deployment or that he accomplished the deployment. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice with respect to his request that his Reserve time be added to his DD Form 214 and that he be awarded the Armed Forces...
The VA told him to bring in his TDY records which he doesn’t have. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP2 recommends the application be denied. While the possibility exists that the applicant may have been in Vietnam at some time, he has provided no evidence substantiating he was deployed to Vietnam for any specific dates or length of time.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007886
The applicant's military personnel records do not show any evidence that he was awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for service in support of the Cuban Missile Crisis. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal is authorized for participants in military operations within a specific geographic area during a specified time period. However, there is no evidence of record and the applicant provides insufficient...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2010 02755
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2010-02755 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect award of: 1. In their notification letter to the applicant, DPSIDRA indicates the AFGCM was authorized on 1 June 1963 and is awarded to...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03108
DPPPR states after reviewing the applicants military record they are unable to find evidence the applicant deployed in support of the Cuban Missile Crisis and the applicant did not provide documentation to substantiate his claim for award of the AFEM. The applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. In this regard we note the applicant’s unit of assignment during his enlistment was not a...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00675
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00675 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM). _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 25 May 1955, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force in the grade of airman...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04105
He indicates that he filed a claim and it was denied because his records do not reflect his time served in Vietnam. In support of his appeal, the applicant provided a personal statement. There are no documents in the applicant’s military personnel records that reflect that he was stationed or sent TDY to Vietnam during his tour of duty in the Air Force.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01452
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends denial. There is no indication in his records that he was TDY at any time while he was on active duty. Dean Yount, Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 17 Apr 03.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03009
The complete AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant notes the incorrect date of 14 Feb 67, in the advisory opinion, that was reflected as the date he entered active duty. We appreciate the applicants service to the Nation, but find he does not meet the requirement for award of the AFEM for support of the Cuban Missile Crisis. Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02126
In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge and the history of the 39th Bombardment Wing. _________________________________________________________________ The SAEMR is awarded to all U.S. Air Force service members who, after 1 January 1963, qualify as expert in small-arms marksmanship with either the M-16 or the issue handgun. While the applicant believes he is entitled to the AFEM, a...