Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03515
Original file (BC-2002-03515.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03515

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  YES


_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States  Report  of  Transfer  or
Discharge, be corrected to reflect his Temporary Duties (TDYs) to  Pope  AFB
and Travis AFB during the Cuban Missile Crisis, and his TDY to Vietnam  from
Hickam AFB in 1963.

_________________________________________________________________

THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Public Law 106-419 provides compensation for Vietnam veterans  serving  time
in that country; however, he is being denied  compensation  because  his  DD
Form 214 does not reflect his TDY to Vietnam.

Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 12 January 1961, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air  Force  for  a
period of four years.  He was progressively promoted to the grade of  airman
second class (E-3).  However, as a result of nonjudicial punishment  imposed
under Article 15 of the Uniform Code of  Military  Justice  (UCMJ),  he  was
reduced to the grade of airman third  class  (E-2),  effective  28  February
1964.

He was released from active duty on 11 January 1965, and transferred to  the
Air Force Reserve under the provisions of AFR 39-10 (Expiration of  Term  of
Service), after completion of four years of active  service.   The  DD  Form
214 issued in conjunction with his release from active duty  indicates  that
he completed 2 years, 1 month, and 29 days of foreign service.

An AF Form 7, Airman Military Record, indicates  that  he  was  assigned  to
Hickam AFB, HI, from 3 August 1961 through 1 October 1963.

Block VII, Comments of Reporting  Official,  on  AF  Form  75,  USAF  Airman
Performance Report (APR), rendered for the  period  12 January  1962  to  11
January 1963, while applicant was  assigned  to  Hickam  AFB,  contains  the
statement, “During the recent alert, [applicant] was one  of  the  first  to
volunteer his services and skill in  accompanying  and  supporting  aircraft
involved in the alert.”

On 11 January 1967, he was honorably discharged from the Air Force Reserve.

On 1 November 2000, Public Law 106-419,  amended  Title  38,  United  States
Code, to increase amounts of educational assistance for veterans  under  the
Montgomery GI Bill and to enhance programs  providing  educational  benefits
under that title, and for other purposes.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPAPP2 recommends the application be denied and states, in  part,  that
there are no documents in the applicant’s records to reflect any TDYs to  or
his participation in the Cuban Missile Crisis.  He was asked to  review  his
personnel records to see if he might have any documents that could  be  used
to support his claim; however, he did not respond.

The AFPC/DPAPP2 evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to  the  applicant
on 14 February 2003 for review and response within 30 days.  However, as  of
this date, this office has received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest  of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  The applicant contends that  he  is  being
denied compensation given to  Vietnam  Veterans  under  Public  Law  106-419
because his DD Form 214 does not reflect his TDY to Vietnam.   In  addition,
his TDYs to Pope AFB and Travis AFB, during the Cuban Missile Crisis  should
also be included on his DD Form 214.  However, the evidence  of  record  and
the applicant’s  submission,  do  not  contain  any  source  documents  that
confirm his completion of any TDYs and participation in  the  Cuban  Missile
Crisis.  The appropriate office  of  primary  responsibility  contacted  the
applicant and requested he review his personnel records for  any  additional
supporting documentation; however,  he  has  not  responded.   The  personal
sacrifice the applicant endured for his country is noted  and  our  decision
in no way diminishes the high regard we have for his service;  however,  the
applicant has failed to sustain his burden that his records are in error  or
unjust.  Hence, we find  no  compelling  basis  to  recommend  granting  the
relief sought.

4.  The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been  shown
that a personal appearance with or without counsel will  materially  add  to
our understanding of the issues involved.   Therefore,  the  request  for  a
hearing is not favorably considered.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered  Docket  Number  BC-2002-03515
in Executive Session on 8 May 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

                       Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Vice Chair
                       Mr. James W. Russell, III, Member
                       Ms. Cheryl Jacobson, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 22 Oct 02.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPAPP2, dated 3 Feb 03, w/atch.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 Feb 03.




                                   THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
                                   Vice Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02809

    Original file (BC-2002-02809.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPPPR states that he provided a copy of an order deploying him from Barksdale AFB on 9 Mar 59 for 90 days to APO NT 677 for a SAC rotational movement but he did not provide documentation to show the location of the deployment or that he accomplished the deployment. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice with respect to his request that his Reserve time be added to his DD Form 214 and that he be awarded the Armed Forces...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | 0201994

    Original file (0201994.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VA told him to bring in his TDY records which he doesn’t have. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP2 recommends the application be denied. While the possibility exists that the applicant may have been in Vietnam at some time, he has provided no evidence substantiating he was deployed to Vietnam for any specific dates or length of time.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007886

    Original file (20090007886.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military personnel records do not show any evidence that he was awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for service in support of the Cuban Missile Crisis. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal is authorized for participants in military operations within a specific geographic area during a specified time period. However, there is no evidence of record and the applicant provides insufficient...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2010 02755

    Original file (BC 2010 02755.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2010-02755 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect award of: 1. In their notification letter to the applicant, DPSIDRA indicates the AFGCM was authorized on 1 June 1963 and is awarded to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03108

    Original file (BC-2005-03108.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPPPR states after reviewing the applicants military record they are unable to find evidence the applicant deployed in support of the Cuban Missile Crisis and the applicant did not provide documentation to substantiate his claim for award of the AFEM. The applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. In this regard we note the applicant’s unit of assignment during his enlistment was not a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00675

    Original file (BC-2004-00675.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00675 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM). _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 25 May 1955, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force in the grade of airman...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04105

    Original file (BC-2002-04105.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He indicates that he filed a claim and it was denied because his records do not reflect his time served in Vietnam. In support of his appeal, the applicant provided a personal statement. There are no documents in the applicant’s military personnel records that reflect that he was stationed or sent TDY to Vietnam during his tour of duty in the Air Force.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01452

    Original file (BC-2003-01452.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends denial. There is no indication in his records that he was TDY at any time while he was on active duty. Dean Yount, Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 17 Apr 03.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03009

    Original file (BC-2010-03009.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The complete AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant notes the incorrect date of “14 Feb 67,” in the advisory opinion, that was reflected as the date he entered active duty. We appreciate the applicant’s service to the Nation, but find he does not meet the requirement for award of the AFEM for support of the Cuban Missile Crisis. Exhibit B.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02126

    Original file (BC-2010-02126.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge and the history of the 39th Bombardment Wing. _________________________________________________________________ The SAEMR is awarded to all U.S. Air Force service members who, after 1 January 1963, qualify as expert in small-arms marksmanship with either the M-16 or the issue handgun. While the applicant believes he is entitled to the AFEM, a...