RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01994
INDEX CODE: 110.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from the Armed Forces,
be amended to reflect service in Vietnam for the years 1963 and 1964.
_________________________________________________________________
THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was sent on several temporary assignments to Vietnam. He spent more
time TDY to Vietnam than with his unit at Clark AFB, PI. He is a Vietnam
veteran. Since returning from Southeast Asia in 1965 he has had medical
problems. He went to the Veterans Administration (VA) hospital in the late
1960’s and 1970’s for help but they refused. Even though he doesn’t smoke,
he was diagnosed last year with lung cancer. He was told by a buddy to go
to the VA and sign-up on the Agent Orange registry. However, he couldn’t
register with the VA Agent Orange registry because he couldn’t prove he was
ever in Vietnam. He felt betrayed. The VA has told him that this same
problem happens to other veterans. He can’t believe his country sent him
to South Vietnam and other places and they have no record of it. His life
hasn’t been much but at least he is a Vietnam Veteran and served his
country. The VA told him to bring in his TDY records which he doesn’t
have. He remembers that some of his TDY’s didn’t have destinations written
on them. He remembers the events that happened in Vietnam and now is not
the time for his country to take this away from him. He needs help getting
a DD Form 215 to reflect he served in Vietnam during the years of 1963 and
1964. Six months after he returned from Southeast Asia, his life has been
full of unexplained medical problems. His children born after his return
from Southeast Asia have suffered medical problems and currently his 22
year old daughter has unexplained medical problems.
In support of his appeal, applicant submits a personal statement; and a
copy of his DD Form 214.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force in the grade of airman
basic (E-1) on 19 July 1961. Records reflect an overseas tour in the
Philippines with assignment to the 405th Field Maintenance Squadron, Clark
AB, PI on or about 10 October 1963. On 27 January 1965, the applicant was
released from active duty for Convenience of the Government. On 28 January
1965, he was transferred to the Air Force Reserve for completion of his
military service obligation. He had served 3 years, 6 months and 9 days on
active duty of which 1 year, 3 months, and 4 days was foreign service.
Effective 18 July 1967, he was honorably discharged from the Air Force
Reserve.
VA records indicate that the applicant initiated a disability claim on 2
June 1965 for a lung condition. On 17 September 1965, in accordance with
the applicant’s request, his claim was disregarded.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPAPP2 recommends the application be denied. DPAPP2 states that the
only overseas assignment recorded in the applicant’s record is an
assignment to 405th Field Maintenance Squadron, Clark AFB, PI. He was
assigned to that unit from 8 October 1963 to 8 March 1965.
The AFPC/DPAPP2 evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Applicant states that a grave injustice is being committed against him and
he does not and never will accept the recommendation given by AFPC/DPAPP2.
He states that his DD Form 214 clearly states he was honorably discharged
on 27 January 1965, which is correct, however, the evaluation states he was
assigned to the 405th Field Maintenance Squadron, Clark AFB, PI through 8
March 1965. This is an example of shoddy work. Applicant states he is not
looking for money or health care. He has both. He will not allow that his
pride of being a Vietnam veteran be taken away. He spent more time TDY in
Vietnam and should receive frequent flyer miles for all his flights to
Danang and Tonsonut AB outside of Saigon. He volunteered for every TDY to
Vietnam that came along. He was one of few electricians that was competent
to work alone on the aircrafts. He believes his TDY orders were classified
or secret. He cried when the VA said he had not been to Vietnam. Now that
he is being denied again, he is angry and will not give up. He has been
shot at on more than one occasion and lost people he worked with in
Vietnam. He is very proud to have served his country and to have served in
Vietnam. Applicant’s letter is at Exhibit E.
Applicant’s letter, with attachments, is at Exhibit E.
On 31 October 2002 and 27 November 2002, Congressman Davis’ office
requested assistance on behalf of his consituent, that the applicant’s
Vietnam service be reflected in his military service record. Copies of
these letters are at Exhibit F.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. Applicant’s contentions are duly noted;
however, we do not find these uncorroborated assertions, in and by
themselves, sufficiently persuasive to override the rational provided by
the Air Force. While the possibility exists that the applicant may have
been in Vietnam at some time, he has provided no evidence substantiating he
was deployed to Vietnam for any specific dates or length of time. Should
the applicant provide more expansive evidence demonstrating his deployment
to Vietnam, we would be willing to reconsider his petition. Absent such
evidence, we must agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt
the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant
has failed to sustain his burden that he has suffered either an error or an
injustice. The personal sacrifice the applicant endured for his country is
noted and the recommendation to deny the requested relief in no way
diminishes the high regard we have for his service; however, insufficient
documentary evidence has been presented to warrant relief. Therefore, we
find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 02-01994 in
Executive Session on 19 February 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Vice Chair
Mr. James W. Russell, III, Member
Ms. Kathleen F. Graham, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 14 Jun 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPAPP2, dated 12 Oct 02.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 18 Oct 02.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 23 Oct 02 w/atchs.
Exhibit F. Letters, Congresswoman Davis, dated 31 Oct
& 27 Nov 02.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Vice Chair
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00826 INDEX CODE 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from the Armed Forces, be amended to reflect service in Vietnam. His final destination was Bien Hoa Air Base, Republic of Vietnam, another classified mission, where he provided...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02484
The author recommends the applicant be credited with at least 30 days TDY to Tuy Hoa AB, Vietnam during 18 Mar 68 to 13 Apr 69. If it was stamped in Vietnam any time after 28 Mar 68, the applicant could not have been there for 30 days since his medical records show he was in a fistfight in Taiwan on 18 Apr 68 and was hospitalized until 24 Apr 68. While the possibility exists that the applicant may have been in Vietnam at some time, he has provided no evidence verifying that he was TDY...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03515
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03515 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect his Temporary Duties (TDYs) to Pope AFB and Travis AFB during the Cuban Missile Crisis, and his TDY to Vietnam from Hickam AFB in 1963. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03334
The DPAPP2 evaluation is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states the Air Force sent him TDY to the country of Vietnam during October - November 1968 and he collected two months combat pay for the time spent there. The Air Force should have records of his TDY somewhere. __________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02676
In support of his request, the applicant submits a copy of his DD Form 214, and eight copies of his AF Forms 626, Temporary Duty Order Military, with dates ranging from April 1966 through June 1967. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of the request to show Vietnam service, and states, in part, they were able to verify and confirm the applicants foreign service at Clark Air Base, Republic of the Philippines,...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00722
His Air Force Form 7 does show he was TDY to Southeast Asia for a total of 97 days during 1969. Although the applicant provided no evidence to show actual locations while TDY to Southeast Asia (SEA), it was noted that his DD Form 214 reflects award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM). The DVA denied his request because his military records reflect service in Southeast Asia (SEA), but not specifically in Vietnam.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00265
In support of his appeal, applicant submits a personal statement; a supporting statement; a copy of his DD Form 214; a copy of his airman separation record and personal pictures. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force in the grade of airman basic (E-1) on 21 May 1973 for a period of 4 years. DPAPP2 states that there are no documents in the applicant's record that verify Vietnam service.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02998
He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). In support of his request, applicant provided a copy of his DD Form 214 and a copy of his service record. The DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 22 Nov 02 and 7 Mar 03 for review and comment within 30 days.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-1999-01621
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-1999-01621 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: Dec 12, 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect award of the Vietnam Service Medal. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03128
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which are at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial and states that there is no evidence that supports the applicants contention that he served in Vietnam during the inclusive dates for these awards. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit...