Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03334
Original file (BC-2003-03334.doc) Auto-classification: Denied


                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:                       DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2003-03334
                                             INDEX CODE:  113.00
      XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX                COUNSEL: NO

      XXXXXXXXXXXX                           HEARING DESIRED: YES

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His records be corrected to reflect his service in Vietnam and he  receive
any compensation due him.

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He performed temporary duty (TDY) in Cam-Rahn,  Vietnam,  in  October  and
November 1968.  He received two months of combat pay for the time he spent
there.  He has contacted every office he knows of, including  the  Defense
Finance and Accounting Service, in an attempt to get  copies  of  his  pay
record for the time period he asserts he was TDY to Vietnam.

In  support  of  his  application,  the  applicant  provides  a   personal
statement.  The applicant’s complete submission, with  attachment,  is  at
Exhibit A.

___________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 13 July 1966, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force at the  age
of 17 in the grade of airman basic (E-1). He was progressively  promoted  to
the rank of technical sergeant (E-6) effective 1 October 1981.   On  31  May
1987, the applicant was honorably discharged effective 1 June  1987  with  a
separation code RBD (sufficient service for retirement) and  a  reenlistment
code 2V (applied for retirement, or retirement approved).  He had served  20
years, 4 months and 16 days of active duty service,  of  which  8  years,  1
month, and 19 days was foreign service.

According to the applicant’s military personnel records, he served  32  days
of foreign service in Southeast Asia (SEA) from 15 October 1968  through  15
November  1968;  however,  the  records  do  not  reflect   in   which   SEA
country(ies) he served.

___________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPAPP2  recommends  the  application  be  denied.   DPAPP2  states  the
applicant did not provide any evidence to support his claim  of  service  in
Vietnam.  Additionally, there are no documents  in  the  applicant’s  Master
Personnel Records that shows service in Vietnam.  The DPAPP2  evaluation  is
at Exhibit C.

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The applicant states the Air Force sent him TDY to the country of  Vietnam
during October - November 1968 and he collected two months combat pay  for
the time spent there.  The Air  Force  should  have  records  of  his  TDY
somewhere.  The applicant’s rebuttal is at Exhibit E.

____________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest  of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  After a thorough review of  the  available
records, we found no evidence that the individual was  deployed  or  TDY  to
Vietnam.  According  to  the  applicant’s  military  personnel  records,  he
served 32 days of foreign service in Southeast Asia;  however,  the  records
do not reflect in which SEA  country(ies)  he  served.   In  cases  of  this
nature, the burden rests with the applicant to provide a  showing  of  error
or injustice.  The applicant did not provide  any  documentary  evidence  to
substantiate his claim.   In  the  absence  of  such  evidence  we  find  no
compelling  basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief   sought   in   this
application.

__________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

__________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application in  Executive
Session on 12 February 2004, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

            Ms. Brenda L. Romine, Panel Chair
            Ms. Barbara R. Murray, Member
            Mr. David C. VanGasbeck, Member

The following documentary evidence for AFBCMR  Docket  Number  BC-2003-03334
was considered:

      Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 1 Oct 03.
      Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
      Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPAPP2, dated 31 Oct 03.
      Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 Nov 03.
      Exhibit E.  Applicant’s Rebuttal, undated.




                             BRENDA L. ROMINE
                                             Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01070

    Original file (BC-2003-01070.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP2 states that there are no documents in applicant’s Master Field Personnel Record that support his claim for service in Southwest Asia. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their rationale as the basis for the conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00722

    Original file (BC-2003-00722.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    His Air Force Form 7 does show he was TDY to Southeast Asia for a total of 97 days during 1969. Although the applicant provided no evidence to show actual locations while TDY to Southeast Asia (SEA), it was noted that his DD Form 214 reflects award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM). The DVA denied his request because his military records reflect service in Southeast Asia (SEA), but not specifically in Vietnam.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00147

    Original file (BC-2003-00147.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00147 INDEX CODE: 113.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect the specific dates he was assigned to Thailand and Vietnam. ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | 0201994

    Original file (0201994.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VA told him to bring in his TDY records which he doesn’t have. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP2 recommends the application be denied. While the possibility exists that the applicant may have been in Vietnam at some time, he has provided no evidence substantiating he was deployed to Vietnam for any specific dates or length of time.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | 0001810A

    Original file (0001810A.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-01810 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, he requests additional credit for his foreign service and that he be awarded the following decorations: Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with Combat “V” Device, the Vietnam Service and Campaign...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200042

    Original file (0200042.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00042 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect medals for service while on temporary duty (TDY) to Takhli, Thailand. Unfortunately, the applicant’s records do not reflect that he was deployed to Thailand in direct support of operations in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03253

    Original file (BC 2014 03253.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 5 December 2011, AFPC/DPAPP notified the applicant that after a complete review of his official military records, they were able to verify and confirm “boots on ground” and foreign service time at Ching Chuan Kang Air Base, Taiwan, from 11 August 1967 to 15 September 1968, for one year, one month, and five days. The Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM) is awarded to members who: (1) served for six months in South Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 and 28 March 1973; (2) served...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00265

    Original file (BC-2003-00265.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his appeal, applicant submits a personal statement; a supporting statement; a copy of his DD Form 214; a copy of his airman separation record and personal pictures. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force in the grade of airman basic (E-1) on 21 May 1973 for a period of 4 years. DPAPP2 states that there are no documents in the applicant's record that verify Vietnam service.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02942

    Original file (BC-2012-02942.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02942 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect that he received the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) for his service in Vietnam and Thailand. He spent over 20 total months in Thailand, Vietnam, and Okinawa in 1967, 1968, and 1969. The remaining relevant facts...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03707

    Original file (BC-2012-03707.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to his application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAA recommends denial, indicating that based on the evidence provided, a temporary duty (TDY) assignment to the RVN cannot be confirmed. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit...