Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00665
Original file (BC-2003-00665.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00665

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO


_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

She be reimbursed  for  the  Family  Servicemembers’  Group  Life  Insurance
(FSGLI) premiums deducted  from  her  pay  from  1 August  2002  through  31
January 2003.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

She was never notified that FSGLI applied to active  duty  military  members
with an active duty spouse already covered under the  Servicemembers’  Group
Life Insurance (SGLI).

The applicant states her Military Personnel Flight (MPF) failed to  properly
do their job and take out the allotments when  due.   Furthermore,  the  MPF
took it upon themselves to take her pay without her consent or knowledge.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force.

On 5 June 2001, Public Law 107-14 established the  FSGLI  program  that  was
implemented on 1 November 2001, making it  possible  for  servicemembers  to
provide up to $100,000 coverage for their spouse and  $10,000  coverage  for
their dependent children through the Office of  Servicemembers’  Group  Life
Insurance.  The coverage, by law, was automatic unless the  member  declined
the coverage.

The applicant married an active duty member of the Army on 2 August 2001.

Her spouse was honorably discharged from the Army on 16 December 2002.

On 18 February 2003, she completed an SGLV 8286A, electing to decline  FSGLI
coverage for her spouse.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPW recommends the application be denied.  ARPC/DPW  states,  in  part,
that the Air Force aggressively campaigned to  make  members  aware  of  the
FSGLI program and their benefits.  Specific instructions were also  provided
to all Air Force bases on the procedures they needed to follow in  order  to
ensure that  military  married  to  other  military  members  were  properly
charged for this new benefit.  The Air Force fully complied with the law  by
providing information in advance of implementations so  that  members  could
make an informed decision.  In addition to comments  about  FSGLI  appearing
in the remarks section of every member’s Leave and Earning  Statement  (LES)
from 30 August 2001 through 15 November 2001, officials at  the  applicant’s
base  also  provided  information  to  all  members  through  their   unit’s
commander’s support staff as an additional step to  educate  the  community.
She has not provided any documentation to indicate that she  was  not  aware
of the change and her responsibility to make an election decision.

The AFPC/DPW evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to  the  applicant
on 28 March 2003 for review and response within 30  days.   However,  as  of
this date, this office has received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law  or
regulations.

2.    The application was timely filed.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  Public Law 107-14  established  the  FSGLI
program that was implemented on 1 November  2001,  making  it  possible  for
servicemembers to provide up to  $100,000  coverage  for  their  spouse  and
$10,000  coverage  for  their  dependent  children  through  the  Office  of
Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance.  The coverage, by law,  was  automatic
for all members of the Armed  Forces  who  had  a  spouse  and/or  children,
unless the member declined coverage.  Members who did  not  desire  coverage
had to complete an election declining coverage during the month of  November
2001.  No evidence has been submitted showing that  the  applicant  declined
coverage during the month of November 2001.   The  applicant  contends  that
she was never notified that FSGLI applied to active  duty  military  members
with an active duty spouse already covered under  the  SGLI.   However,  the
Air Force aggressively  campaigned  to  make  members  aware  of  the  FSGLI
program and their benefits, and she has not provided  any  documentation  to
indicate that she was not aware of the  change  and  her  responsibility  to
make an  election  decision.   We  therefore  agree  with  the  opinion  and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility  and  adopt
their rationale as the basis for our conclusion  that  no  basis  exists  to
reimburse the premiums withheld.  Therefore, we find no basis  to  recommend
granting the relief sought in this application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered  Docket  Number  BC-2003-00665
in Executive Session on 25 July 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

                  Mr. Joseph G. Diamond, Panel Chair
                  Mr. Jackson A. Hauslein, Member
                  Mr. Edward H. Parker, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

      Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 19 Feb 03, w/atchs.
      Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPW dated 20 Mar 03, w/atchs.
      Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Mar 03.




            JOSEPH G. DIAMOND
            Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01474

    Original file (BC-2004-01474.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. On 2 December 2003, the applicant completed an SGLV 8286A declining FSGLI coverage. In accordance with public law, although premiums had not yet been deducted from her pay, the applicant’s spouse was insured for $100,000.00 for the period 1 November 2001 through 31 December 2003.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03709

    Original file (BC-2002-03709.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Apparently, Mountain Home AFB had failed to enter a code in their records to show joint spouse and exemption from SGLI spouse coverage. There is no declination statement in the member’s record. No premiums were deducted from her pay until she arrived at Laughlin AFB in September 2002.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02213

    Original file (BC-2002-02213.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02213 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be reimbursed for the Family Member Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance (FSGLI) premiums deducted from her pay during the period from 1 November 2001 through 28 February 2002. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. On 5 June 2001,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00134

    Original file (BC-2004-00134.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    They indicated Air Force leadership took adequate steps to inform all members of this new program and the applicant had adequate time to make an election decision. In accordance with public law, although premiums had not yet been deducted from her pay, the applicant’s spouse was insured for $100,000 for the period 1 November 2001 to present. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02212

    Original file (BC-2002-02212.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. On 5 June 2001, Public Law 107-14, established the FSGLI program that was implemented on 1 November 2001, making it possible for servicemembers to provide up to $100,000 coverage for their spouse and $10,000 coverage for their dependent children through the Office of Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance. Public Law 107-14 established the FSGLI program that was implemented on 1 November 2001, making it possible for servicemembers to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00179

    Original file (BC-2003-00179.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    We therefore agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that no basis exists to reimburse the premiums withheld. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2003-00179 in Executive Session on 25 July 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Mr. Joseph G. Diamond, Panel Chair Mr. Jackson A. Hauslein,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | bc-2003-01378

    Original file (bc-2003-01378.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The coverage, by law, was automatic unless the member declined the coverage. However, as of this date, no response has been received by this office. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2003-01378 in Executive Session on 2 December 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36- 2603: Mr. Joseph G. Diamond, Panel Chair Mr. Jackson A. Hauslein, Member Mr. Edward H. Parker, Member The following documentary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | bc-2003-03316

    Original file (bc-2003-03316.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The coverage, by law, was automatic unless the member declined the coverage. In September 2003, he completed an SGLV 8286A, electing to decline FSGLI coverage for his spouse. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2003-03316 in Executive Session on 20 April 2004, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Mr. Joseph G. Diamond, Panel Chair Mr. Jackson A. Hauslein, Member Mr. Edward H. Parker, Member The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01779

    Original file (BC-2003-01779.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. _________________________________________________________________ The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03441

    Original file (BC-2003-03441.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 5 June 2001, Public Law 107-14 established the FSGLI program that was implemented on 1 November 2001, making it possible for servicemembers to provide up to $100,000 coverage for their spouse and $10,000 coverage for their dependent children through the Office of Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPS recommends the application be denied, and states, in part, that there is no record of the...