Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00128
Original file (BC-2003-00128.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2003-00128

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

She be reimbursed for  premiums  deducted  from  her  pay  for  Family
Servicemen’s Group Life Insurance (FSGLI) since 1 August 2002.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

She noticed a $13.00 discretionary allotment and a $26.00 debt  listed
on her November 2002 Leave and Earning Statement (LES).  She  went  to
finance to determine the source and was told it was for FSGLI coverage
for her spouse.  She questioned the response and was referred  to  the
Military Personnel Flight (MPF) who then gave  her  the  paperwork  to
decline coverage for her spouse.  In early September 2002, she went to
the MPF and completed all paperwork given to her  for  marital  status
change.

At no time was she given paperwork to decline coverage for her  spouse
nor was she briefed that this needed to be done.  Because this did not
show up until her November LES, she could not take  corrective  action
sooner.  Aviano MPF told her there was no way to recover  this  money.
In fact, the customer service representative told her she should  feel
lucky because one couple did not notice the allotment for one year and
they would not be able to recover their funds.  Then when she  arrived
in Michigan in late December 2002, her husband told her  to  use  this
form to try to retrieve the money.

Applicant’s complete submission with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________







STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving on extended active duty in the  Air
Force in the grade of captain.

Applicant paid FSGLI premiums from August 2002 to November 2002.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPW recommended denial due to  lack  of  sufficient  evidence  to
support the claim.

AFPC/DPW complete evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A complete copy of the Air  Force  evaluation  was  forwarded  to  the
applicant on 18 April 2003, for review and comment.  As of this  date,
no response has been received by this office.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies  provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.    The application was timely filed.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of an error or injustice.  After a  thorough  review  of
the  evidence  of  record  and  applicant’s  submission,  we  are  not
persuaded the applicant should be reimbursed for  the  FSGLI  premiums
she paid from August 2002 to November 2002.   Applicant’s  contentions
are duly noted; however, we do not find these assertions,  in  and  by
themselves, sufficiently persuasive to override the rationale provided
by the office of primary  responsibility.   We  therefore  agree  with
their recommendation and adopt the rationale expressed  as  the  basis
for our decision that the applicant has failed to sustain  her  burden
of having suffered either an error or an injustice.  In  view  of  the
above and absent persuasive evidence  to  the  contrary,  we  find  no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought.

_________________________________________________________________




THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered Docket  Number  BC-2003-
00128 in Executive Session on, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

                 Mr. Joseph G. Diamond, Panel Chair
                 Mr. Jackson Hauslein, Jr., Member
                 Mr. Edward H. Parker, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:


      Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 8 Jan 03, w/atch.
      Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPW, dated 15 Apr 03.
      Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 18 Apr 03.





      JOSEPH G. DIAMOND
      Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03862

    Original file (BC-2002-03862.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: In January 2002, she went to the Customer Service Section at the Military Personnel Flight (MPF) in Keflavik, Iceland, to decline the spousal portion of the new FSGLI coverage. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant explained that she did not respond to AFPC/DPW’s request for additional documentation because there was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03863

    Original file (BC-2002-03863.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: In January 2002, he went to the Customer Service Section at the Military Personnel Flight (MPF) in Keflavik, Iceland, to decline the spousal portion of the new FSGLI coverage. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant explained that he did not respond to AFPC/DPW’s request for additional documentation because there was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00665

    Original file (BC-2003-00665.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 5 June 2001, Public Law 107-14 established the FSGLI program that was implemented on 1 November 2001, making it possible for servicemembers to provide up to $100,000 coverage for their spouse and $10,000 coverage for their dependent children through the Office of Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance. The applicant married an active duty member of the Army on 2 August 2001. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPW recommends the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02974

    Original file (BC-2003-02974.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and stated despite what the OTS personnel stated she had provided the Board with only information she was given regarding the SGLI program. She states that had she seen the FSGLI premiums being deducted from her pay, she would have taken action to decline coverage. _________________________________________________________________ THE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02018

    Original file (BC-2003-02018.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant did not respond or provide the additional information needed to sufficiently evaluate her claim. As of this date, this office has received no response (Exhibit C). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00548

    Original file (BC-2003-00548.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00548 INDEX CODE: 128.14 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be reimbursed for premiums paid on her Family Servicemember’s Group Life Insurance (FSGLI) as of 1 November 2001. DPW requested the applicant provide a copy of her SGLV 8286A, Family...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01393

    Original file (BC-2003-01393.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPW requested the applicant provide a copy of her SGLV 8286A, Family Coverage Election Certificate, declining coverage and any documentation to support her claim. Applicant did not respond or provide the additional information needed to sufficiently evaluate her claim. The HQ AFPC/DPW evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02449

    Original file (BC-2003-02449.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 13 June 2003, the applicant declined FSGLI coverage on SGLV 8286A, Family Coverage Election. The applicant’s Leave and Earnings Statement dated for the month of May 2003, indicates a total debt of $360 for FSGLI premiums from 1 November 2001 through 30 April 2003. DPW states that in accordance to public law, although premiums had not yet been deducted from her pay, the applicant’s spouse was insured for $100,000 for the period 1 November 2001 through 30 June 2003.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00106

    Original file (BC-2003-00106.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00106 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be reimbursed for Family Servicemember’s Group Life Insurance (FSGLI) premiums he paid for the period of 1 August 2002 through 31 January 2003. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPW...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03848

    Original file (BC-2002-03848.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. Applicant's Master...