RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02748
INDEX CODE: 128.14
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
She be reimbursed for premiums paid on her Family Servicemember’s Group
Life Insurance (FSGLI).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She makes no contentions.
The applicant provided copies of her Leave and Earning Statement (LES) for
the period December 2002 through February 2003
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving on active duty in the rank of Staff
Sergeant (E-5). DPW stated applicant indicated she declined FSGLI prior to
the 30 December 2002 declination she included as an attachment to her
request. On 26 September 2003, DPW notified the applicant that they were
unable to process her application without additional documentation. DPW
requested a copy of her SGLV 8286A, Family Coverage Election Certificate,
dated prior to 30 December 2002, and any documentation to support her
claim. As of this date, she has not responded. LES's for the periods
December 2002 through February 2003 show SGLI deductions of $20.00 per
month.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
DPW indicates that the applicant failed to respond to their 26 September
2003 letter, requesting additional documentation to evaluate her claim.
Therefore, DPW recommends denial based on insufficient documentation to
support her claim.
DPW evaluation, with attachment, is attached at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 24
November 2003 for review and response. As of this date, this office has
received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. The applicant was properly charged with a
debt as a result of the passage of Public Law 106-419, Section 312,
effective 1 April 2001, which automatically increased the level of SGLI
coverage. Since the applicant did not provide the additional information
requested in order to sufficiently evaluate her claim, it is our opinion
that no basis exists to reimburse the premiums withheld. Therefore, the
applicant’s request is not favorably considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 20 April 2004, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Joseph G. Diamond, Panel Chairman
Mr. Jackson A. Hauslein Jr., Member
Mr. Edward H. Parker, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered for AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2003-02748:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 24 Feb 03.
Exhibit B. Letter, ARPC/DPW, dated 24 Nov 03 w/atch.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 5 Dec 03.
JOSEPH G. DIAMOND
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01393
DPW requested the applicant provide a copy of her SGLV 8286A, Family Coverage Election Certificate, declining coverage and any documentation to support her claim. Applicant did not respond or provide the additional information needed to sufficiently evaluate her claim. The HQ AFPC/DPW evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03862
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: In January 2002, she went to the Customer Service Section at the Military Personnel Flight (MPF) in Keflavik, Iceland, to decline the spousal portion of the new FSGLI coverage. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant explained that she did not respond to AFPC/DPW’s request for additional documentation because there was...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02018
Applicant did not respond or provide the additional information needed to sufficiently evaluate her claim. As of this date, this office has received no response (Exhibit C). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02974
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and stated despite what the OTS personnel stated she had provided the Board with only information she was given regarding the SGLI program. She states that had she seen the FSGLI premiums being deducted from her pay, she would have taken action to decline coverage. _________________________________________________________________ THE...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00548
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00548 INDEX CODE: 128.14 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be reimbursed for premiums paid on her Family Servicemember’s Group Life Insurance (FSGLI) as of 1 November 2001. DPW requested the applicant provide a copy of her SGLV 8286A, Family...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03863
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: In January 2002, he went to the Customer Service Section at the Military Personnel Flight (MPF) in Keflavik, Iceland, to decline the spousal portion of the new FSGLI coverage. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant explained that he did not respond to AFPC/DPW’s request for additional documentation because there was...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00665
On 5 June 2001, Public Law 107-14 established the FSGLI program that was implemented on 1 November 2001, making it possible for servicemembers to provide up to $100,000 coverage for their spouse and $10,000 coverage for their dependent children through the Office of Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance. The applicant married an active duty member of the Army on 2 August 2001. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPW recommends the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00638
DPW requested the applicant provide a copy of his SGLV 8286A, Family Coverage Election Certificate, declining coverage and any documentation to support his claim. Since the applicant did not provide the additional information requested in order to sufficiently evaluate his claim, it is our opinion that no basis exists to reimburse the premiums withheld. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01091
Applicant did not respond or provide the additional information needed to sufficiently evaluate her claim. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03984
In support of her application, the applicant submits a copy of her Family Coverage Election form, dated 4 October 2002; and a copy of her leave and earnings statement, dated 1-30 November 2002. Since the applicant did not provide the additional information requested in order to sufficiently evaluate her claim, it is our opinion that no basis exists to reimburse the premiums withheld. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant...