Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00638
Original file (BC-2003-00638.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2003-00638
            INDEX CODE: 128.14
      XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX      COUNSEL:  NONE

      XXXXXXXXXXXXXX   HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be reimbursed for premiums paid on his Family Servicemember’s Group  Life
Insurance (FSGLI).

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

FSGLI premiums have been deducted  from  his  pay  since  1  November  2001.
After being contacted by the Military Personnel  Flight  NCOIC  of  Customer
Service in September  2002,  he  elected  to  enroll  his  spouse  in  FSGLI
effective September 2002.  However, when he received his October  2002  LES,
he noticed he had a debt of $143 for  FSGLI  premiums  owed  since  November
2001.  He checked with the finance office and  Customer  Service  NCOIC  and
was informed that  the  FSGLI  was  effective  in  November  2001.   He  was
miscounseled by the Customer Service NCOIC.  He would have decline  coverage
had he known the payments would have been retroactive to November 2001.   He
cancelled his FSGLI and was told he would have to  apply  to  the  BCMR  for
reimbursement of the premiums already deducted.

In support of his application, the applicant submits  copies  of  his  Leave
and Earnings Statements (LES) for  the  months  of  October,  November,  and
December 2002.  The applicant’s complete submission,  with  attachments,  is
at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving on active duty  in  the  rank  of  master
sergeant (E-7).  His Total Active Federal Military Service Date is  27  July
1982.

On 27 May 2003, AFPC/DPW notified the applicant that  they  were  unable  to
process his request without additional  documentation.   DPW  requested  the
applicant provide a  copy  of  his  SGLV  8286A,  Family  Coverage  Election
Certificate, declining coverage and any documentation to support his  claim.


_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPW  recommends  the  application  be  denied.   DPW  states  that  the
applicant did not provide the additional information needed to  sufficiently
evaluate his claim.  The DPW evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force Evaluation was forwarded to the applicant  on  15
August 2003, for review and comment within 30 days.   As  of  this  date,
this office has received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  The applicant was properly charged with  a
debt as a result  of  the  passage  of  Public  Law  106-419,  Section  312,
effective 1 April 2001, which automatically  increased  the  level  of  SGLI
coverage.  Since the applicant did not provide  the  additional  information
requested in order to sufficiently evaluate his claim,  it  is  our  opinion
that no basis exists to reimburse the  premiums  withheld.   Therefore,  the
applicant’s request is not favorably considered.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application in  Executive
Session on 2 December 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

           Mr. Joseph G. Diamond, Panel Chairman
           Mr. Jackson Hauslein Jr., Member
           Mr. Edward Parker, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered for AFBCMR  Docket  Number
BC-2003-00638:

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 21 Feb 03 w/atchs.
   Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPW, dated 5 Aug 03.
   Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 Aug 03.




                                   JOSEPH G. DIAMOND
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03862

    Original file (BC-2002-03862.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: In January 2002, she went to the Customer Service Section at the Military Personnel Flight (MPF) in Keflavik, Iceland, to decline the spousal portion of the new FSGLI coverage. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant explained that she did not respond to AFPC/DPW’s request for additional documentation because there was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03863

    Original file (BC-2002-03863.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: In January 2002, he went to the Customer Service Section at the Military Personnel Flight (MPF) in Keflavik, Iceland, to decline the spousal portion of the new FSGLI coverage. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant explained that he did not respond to AFPC/DPW’s request for additional documentation because there was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02449

    Original file (BC-2003-02449.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 13 June 2003, the applicant declined FSGLI coverage on SGLV 8286A, Family Coverage Election. The applicant’s Leave and Earnings Statement dated for the month of May 2003, indicates a total debt of $360 for FSGLI premiums from 1 November 2001 through 30 April 2003. DPW states that in accordance to public law, although premiums had not yet been deducted from her pay, the applicant’s spouse was insured for $100,000 for the period 1 November 2001 through 30 June 2003.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00128

    Original file (BC-2003-00128.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Aviano MPF told her there was no way to recover this money. Applicant paid FSGLI premiums from August 2002 to November 2002. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01393

    Original file (BC-2003-01393.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPW requested the applicant provide a copy of her SGLV 8286A, Family Coverage Election Certificate, declining coverage and any documentation to support her claim. Applicant did not respond or provide the additional information needed to sufficiently evaluate her claim. The HQ AFPC/DPW evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00548

    Original file (BC-2003-00548.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00548 INDEX CODE: 128.14 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be reimbursed for premiums paid on her Family Servicemember’s Group Life Insurance (FSGLI) as of 1 November 2001. DPW requested the applicant provide a copy of her SGLV 8286A, Family...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00127

    Original file (BC-2003-00127.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00127 INDEX CODE: 128.14 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be changed to show he declined Family Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance (FSGLI) coverage, and he be reimbursed for the premiums deducted from his pay in January, February, March, April, May and June 2002. Since the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-03710

    Original file (BC-2003-03710.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03710 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be reimbursed for the Family Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance (FSGLI) premiums deducted from his pay. He states that had he seen the FSGLI premiums being deducted from his pay, he would have taken action to decline coverage. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-04045

    Original file (BC-2003-04045.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his application, he submits a personal statement and a copy of his (LES). Applicant has failed to provide copies of his LESs prior to November 2002, reflecting no FSGLI premiums were deducted from his pay. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Apr 03.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02748

    Original file (BC-2003-02748.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided copies of her Leave and Earning Statement (LES) for the period December 2002 through February 2003 The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DPW indicates that the applicant failed to respond to their 26 September 2003 letter, requesting additional documentation to evaluate her claim. ...