AIR FORCE BOARD FOX C J R R E C T I O N O F F ~ I L I T A R Y EiECORDS
mmxr; z- PFOCEEDINSS
IN THE MATTER OF:
IIOCKET NU:vI5 ER : 9 8 - 0 0 8 4 2
C'OUKSEL : NONE
1iE;ARING DESIRED : NO
Applicant requests il! T h e amended AF Form 3156, Record of
Proceedings of Vacation of Suspended Nonjudicial Punishment,
dated 11 D e c e m D e r 1,987 be placed In his official record, and ( 2 )
t h e appropriate offenses, if
his record be corrected ta 1-er-ect
any, on the AF Forrri 3370, keto-d of Nonjudicial Punishment
Proceedings, and ar: acknowlediJn?nt b e placed in the record that
he was unlawfully 3r incoi-rectly denied t h e right to see his
child. ApplicanL's subniissiorl 1s at Exhibit A.
1 i h e approprlate Ai: For-ce o t f - c e evaluated applicant's request
a the Eoard rerommending tile
2nd pr-avided dri advisory opir;:an
applicatlorl be deri;ed
T h e advisory opinion was
and response (Exhibit D) .
forwarded to t h e applicant fo: ~ e 7 ~ v - e ~
Applicant's 1-esponsp to t h e adTur,srl?L-y opinion is at Exhibit E.
A f t - e i - careful c o n s i d e ~ a t ; o r i ,Z ap=plicar;t's recuest and t h e
available evidence of r e c o r d , we : :nd insufficieRt evidence of
wdrl-a~l: zolyt3ztive azzion. The facts 2nd
error 01 injustice t
opinions stated i n tile acivisol-:7r a p ~ i ~ : s n a p p e a r to be based on t h e
evidence s € r e c o r d and have xat
c?en arjquately rebutted b > r
den i e d
applicant.
rights to which mici t led, (;;,pi 9p-iat-e :-ygulatians were n o t
followed, or appropi i L 3 L e stari5zlfis ;.:?re n s t applied, we find :IC
b a s i s to disturb the esiszir:c
e v 1 5 z n c e a pp 1. i c an t w a s
1430 s e 11 t 11 e L^ s lLi a s I xr
IExhib::
C, .
+
-
L L L .
3 -
.
.
7 -
-
2OBERT 3 . STUART
'ane 1 2:ia i L-
discovered the absence of an AF E'orrr 63 in his records upon receipt of that RIP; however, that ;s irzelevant to The issue that h e i n c u r e d the A D S C . However, we do not find his uncorroborated contentions, in and by themselves, sufficiently compelling to conclude that he unwittingly incurred an ADSC for training he would not have accepted had he been aware of the ADSC prior to entering the training. Exhibit B.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00017
Information was extracted from the Legal Review) LOR, LOR, LOC, 21 JAN 04 - 08 SEP 03 - 22 FEB 02 - LOR, LOR, LOR, LOC, LOC, 05 NOV 01 - 21 AUG 01 - 21 AUG 01 - 18 JUN 01 - 14 FEB 01 - Financial irresponsibility. On 5 Jan 04, an investigation revealed L11dAnn i ~&shunurabiy fdcd iv pay iis Military Star Card debt, for which he wj3 given a Lettor 6Fiiphand (LOR), dated 2 1 Jan 04, which was filed in his Personnel Information File (PIF). Direct that the respondent bo discharged from the Air...
f o r a 31TY move from The accessorial charge The appllcart is :--c+- -.ls - 7 i 37-,217 45 ILTT stated that after a thorough review of the records, they can find no evidence of miscounseling or an error on the part of the Thus, ILTT recommended the application be denied Government. After a t h o r o u g h review of the evidence of record and applicant s submission, we are unpersuaded that he should be reimbursed additional expenses for moving his sailboat. Diamond, Member Mr. Henry RGmG...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00262A
t I f you fail t-j consult counsel sr to submit s r a t e c e n t s i n y o u r f . Memo for Record, dtd 12 Aug 8 9 I5 .. Nemo far Record, d t d 1 2 Ang 89. Statement; dtd 1 3 Aug 9 9 , I 8 .
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: - The AFBCMR Chief Medical Consultant reviewed this application and is of the opinion that no change In the records is warranted and the application should be d e n i m . *at Based on the medical evidence provided, the IPEB found her condition nad stabilized and recommended thar she be removed from the TDRL and permanently retired w i t h a 40% disability rating. Exhibit C. Letter, AFBCMR Medical Consultant, dated Exhibit D .
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00413
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) ............................ A - - - ------a - - 1'YPE UOTH PERSONAL APPEARANCE , GRADE A1 C X APSNRSAN I ----------------- . 3RD FLOOR ANUREWS AFB, MD 20761-7002 Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DEClSlONAL RATIONALE C4SE NlJMEER FD-2006-00413 GENERAL: The applicant appeals fbr upgrade of discharge to honorable. CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes...
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2003-00527
Not k~mwing this discharge ~. (Atch 6 ) g. On 12 J u l y 1989, you went from your appointed p l a c e of duty without a u t h o r i t y , a s evidenced by a Record o f I n d i v i d u a l Counseling, dated 12 J u l y 1989. If you a r e discharged, you w i l l be i n e l i g i b l e f o r 3.
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00406
(Change Discharge to Honorable) Issues: My discharge was inequitable because it was an isolated incident. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: a. Enlisted as AB 91/07/17 for 4 yrs. Copies of t h e documents t o be forwarded t o t h e separation a u t h o r i t y i n support o f t h i s recommendation a r e attached.
1 s i ., I Office of the Assistant Secretary \1 BC'JlR 98-00007 AIR FORCE BOLL-RD FOP- C O k A ? wclu:d bz a u t h o r i z e d to r e t u r n t o Germany 111 a rwpoi-a:-y d u t y (TDY) s t ; i t u s t o complete z s h i p his EX-*' and HHGs to h i s new d u t y n e c e s s a r y He was a d v i s e d t h a t k I?-auld n o t be s t a t i o n k F Z i . 3 J and H H G s LC h i s new d u t y n e c e s s a r l r a c t i o n s A F B ) aiic -,&:as a d v i s e d t h a t h e would n o t be s t a t l...
The appropriate Air Force o f f i c e evaluated applicarit ‘ s request ana provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit Z The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D ) . T r. 0 additional evaluation was forwarded to applicant f c r re-Jie+; ar,d comment (Exhibit G ’ i . Applicant’s response to the additional evaluation is at Exhibit H. The appropriate After careful consiaeratio~ cf applicant's r e q u e...