Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00406
Original file (FD2006-00406.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD 

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST  MIDDLE INITIAI,) 

I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -  

L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .  

GRADE 

AB 

TYPE  GEN 

X 
CoalNSEt 

PERSONAL APPEARANCE 

AI;SNISSAN 
,---------------- 
----------------. 

RECORD REVIEW 

NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANILA r l O N  

ADDRESS AND OR ORGANI/,A  I ION OF COllNSEL 

YES 

No 

X 

I 

I 

MEMBER SITTING 

-L 

HON 

-- 

I 

VOTE OF T H E  BOARD 

GEN 

I 

I 

I 

.- 
OTHER 

I 

DENY 

EXHIBITS SIJBMlTTED TO THE BOARD 

1 
2 
3 
1  4 

ORDER APPOINTING THE BOAKI) 
AI'I'I.ICA'I'ION  FOR  REVIEW O F  DISC1 IARCiF. 
I,~I"I'F.R OF NO'I'IFICATION 
1  L3RII-F C)F  I'EItSONNEL  FILE 

COUNSEL'S  REL,liASh '1.0 THE BOARD 
ADDI'TIONAI, EXHIBITS SUBMITTED A'l' 'I'IME O F  
PBRSONAI, APPEARANCE 

'I'APE  RECORDWG OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE  HE 

1 

I 

1 

I 
I 

b....................-..-..-.-..-.; 

ISSllES 

A93.01 

INDEY NUMBER 

A94.39 

IIEARINC DATE 

1  24 Apr 2007 

I  FD-2006-00406 

I 

APPLICANT'S  ISSlJE hND THE BOARD'S DEClSlONAL KA7lONAl  ARI:  DISCIISSED ON THE A'll ACHED AIR  FORCr DISCIIARCIT: REVIEW BOARD DEC*ISIONAL KATIONAl,F 

Case heard in Washington,  D.C. 

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board and the right to si~btnit an application  to the AFBCMR. 
1  Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's  request. 

10. 

SAFIMRBR 
550 C STRFI'T  WPS'I. SlJl'l  k 40 
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 781 50-4742 

INDORSEMENT 

w 

DATE:  511 1DUU7 

b ROM 

5LCHI:l  AHV OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COIINC I1 
AIRFORCE UlbCHAHGb HEV1F.W BOARD 
1535COMMANI) OH. I;E 
\VINC,3RD  FLOOR 
ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762.7002 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN  00 

(EF-V2) 

Prcvious e d i t i o n  will  be used 

A I R  FORCE D I S C H A R G E  R E V I E W  B O A R D  DECISIONAL R A T I O N A L E  

C'ASF  NL'MBER 

FD-20U6-00406 

GENERAL:  The applica~it appeal? for upgrade of discliargc lo honorable. 

The applicant appeared and testified beforc the Discharge Review Board (DRB), with counsel, at Andrews AFR on 
24 Apr 2007. 

The followi~ig additional exhibits were submitted at the hearing: 

I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -  

Exhibit #6: Letter from Mr. : ...-...,-.-..-. : 
Exhibit #7: Character letter from: ......................  !of Parking Management, Tnc. 
Exliibit #8: HANDS Program Progress Report 
Exhibit #9: American  Legion Statement 

,--- ------------------ 

The attached brief contai~is available pertinelit data on the applicant and the factors leading to the diqchargc. 

FINDINGS:  Upgrade of d iscliarge is denied. 

Tlie  Board  finds tliat  neither  tlie  evidence  of  record  nor  that  provided  by  the  applicant  substantiates an  inequity or 
impropriety that would justify  a change of discharge. 

Issue  1. 
'I'lie  applicant contends that  his  discharge  was  inequitable because  it  was  an  isolated  incident.  Tlie records 
indicated the applica~it received an Article  15 on  18 Fcbruary  1992 for the wrongful  possession  and  use of marijuana 
on  or  about  22  January  1992.  A  search  of  tlie  applicant's  vehicle  and  liis  dormitory  roo111 uncovercd  vegetable 
appearing matter that  tested  positive  for marijuana.  Additionally,  the applicant  sub~nitted to  a  drug urilialysis  screen 
which confirnied  the prcselice  of the  ~netabolite of ~nari-jua~ia (tetrahydrocannabinol) at a level  above the  Department 
of Defense cut-off  lcvel  15ngIml.  While experimental  usc of ~narijuana could be considcred  a basis for an upgrade of 
discharge, based upon tlie applicant's  own testi~iio~iy of illegal drug use before, during, and after liis enlistment arid the 
quantitics  discovered  in  his  possession,  thc  Board  concluded  that  the  applicant's  use  of  marijuana  on  or  about  22 
January  2007 was  not  experimental.  Additionally,  the  Board  considered  the  possible  cxiste~ice of  a  serious mental 
disorder.  i.e., psychotic disordcr or depressive disordcr. as documented  in the applicant's  post-service riiedical  records, 
which  if  present  at  the  tiri~c lie  com~nitted his  offcnse,  could  have  contributed  to  his  poor judgment  to  use  drugs. 
However, the applicant admitted  fraudulently  feigning a nie~ital illncss for personal  fi~ia~icial gain and  ncver took  his 
prescribed medications. 

Issue 2.  The applica~it cited his prcvious immaturity and renewed desirc to "serve correctly and help [his] country"  by 
re-entering military service via the US Army; and to utilize his expcrie~ice with "computing  and  inventory 
vnanagement."  He also stated that lie lias "leanled  from [his] dysfunctional  life"  and needs to live and practice thc core 
values that the Army will offer him.  TIowever, while the US Army may be willi~ig to waive tlic applicant's  re- 
enlistment code, the DRB detcr~nined that upgrading the discharge  in this case is inappropriate. 

Issue 3.  The applicant also requested consideration  of cleme~~cy 
the "dead-end jobs"  resulting fro111 his discharge.  The DRB is not e~npowered to offer tlic applicant an  upgradc under 
the rules of"clemency"  for the General, u~idcr Ho~iorable Conditions, service characterization  he receivcd. 

in  liis case. citing tlie "stigma"  he has suffered and 

CONCLUSIONS:  The  Discharge  Review  Board  concluded  tliat the  applicant's  discharge  was  consistent  with  tlic 
procedural  and  substantive  require~ncnts o r  tlie  discharge  regulation  and  was  within  the  discrctio~i of the  discharge 
authority and tliat the applicant was provided full ad~ni~listrative due proccss. 

I11  view of the foregoing findings, the Board  further co~icludes that tlicre exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade 
of discharge, tlius the applicant's discharge should not be changed. 

Attachment: 
Examiner's Brier 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 

ANDREWS AFB, MD 

FD2006-00406A 

.----------------------------------. 

I  (Former AB) (HGH AMN)  (REHEARING) 

1.  MATTER UNDER REVIEW:  Appl  rec'd  a Gen Disch fr Griffiss AFB, 
NY  on 04 Mar 92.  UP AFR  39-10, para 5-51  (Misconduct -  Drug 
Abuse).  Appeals  for Honorable Discharge. 

2.  OTHER FACTS: 

a.  See attached cy of Examiner's  Brief dtd  03 Jul 02. 

b.  The AFDRB  reviewed case on 21 Aug  02  (non-appearance w/o 
counsel) &  concluded applicant's  discharge should not be changed. 

3.  BASIS ADVANCED  FOR REHEARING:  Appl  (DD Fm  2 9 3 )   dtd 11 Oct 
06.  (Change Discharge to Honorable) 

Issues:  My discharge was inequitable because  it was an isolated 
incident. 

Atch 

None. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR  FORCE 

AIR  FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 

ANDREWS RFB, MD 

(Former AB)  (HGH AMN) 

1.  MATTER  UNDER REVIEW:  Appl rec'd a GEN Disch fr USAF 92/03/04 UP AFR 39-10, 
para 5-51 (Misconduct -  Drug Abuse).  Appeals for Honorable Disch. 

2.  BACKGROUND: 

a. DOB: 71/06/15.  Enlmt Age: 19 1/12.  Disch Age: 20 8/12. Educ:HS DIPL. 

AFQT: N/A.  A-74,  E-36,  G-53,  M-27. PAFSC: 64530 -  Inventory Management 
Specialist. DAS: 91/11/02. 

b.  Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 90/08/02 -  91/07/16 (11 months 15 days) (Inactive). 

3 .   SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: 

a.  Enlisted as AB 91/07/17 for 4 yrs. Svd: 00 Yrs 07 Mo 18 Das, all AMS. 

b.  Grade Status:  AB  -  92/02/18 (Article 15, 92/02/18) 

AMN -  92/01/17 

c.  Time Lost:  none. 
d.  Art 15's:  (1) 92/02/18, Griffiss AFB, NY -  Article 112a.  You did, on 
or about 22 Jan 92, wrongfully possess about 6 grams of 
marijuana.  Article L12a.  You did, on or about 22 Jan 
92, wrongfully use marijuana.  Reduction to AB, and 
forfeiture of $200.00 pay per month for one month. 
(No appeal) (No mitigation) 

e.  Additional: none. 

f.  CM:  none 

g.  Record of SV: none. 

(Discharged from Griffiss AFB) 

h.  Awards &  Decs:  AFTR. 

i.  Stmt of Sv:  TMS: (01) Yrs  (07) Mos  (03) Das 
TAMS: (00) Yrs  (07) Mos  (18) Das 

4.  BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW:  Appln  (DD Fm 293) dtd 02/03/17. 

(Change Discharge to Honorable) 

Issue 1:  I was immature at the time.  If I had another chance I will serve 

admirably. 

ATCH 
none. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR  FORCE 

@ 

416TH LOGISTICS (3ROUP (SAC) 

QRIFFIGS AIR  FORCE BASE, NEW  YORK  13441-6000 

f ~ d - d d Y 8 6  

RLrLv TO 
ATTN  Of: 

CC 

Z 6  FEB  10s 

. u m J L ~ ~ :   L e t t e r   o f   N o t i f i c a t i o n   -  Discharge  Under  t h e   P r o v i s i o n s   o f   AFR  39-10 

T o   AB  i 

................................................ 
....-.-....-.-.....----------------------------- 

:  416  SUPS 
: , 

1,  I am  recommending  y o u r   discharge  from  the  United  States  A i r   Force  f o r  
misconduct  -  drug  abuse. 
paragraph  5-51. 
c h a r a c t e r i z e d   as  e i t h e r   honorable  o r   general.  I am  recommending  t h a t   your 
s e r v i c e   be  c h a r a c t e r i z e d   as  general. 

I f  my  recommendation  i s  approved,  your  s e r v i c e   w ' i l l   be 

'The  a u t h o r i t y   f o r   t h i s   a c t i o n   i s  AFR  39-10, 

2.  My  reasons  f o r   t h i s   a c t i o n   a r e   y o u r   wrongful  possession  and  use  of 
marijuana  a t   G r i f f i s s   AFB,  New  York,  on  o r   about  22  January  1992,  f o r   which 
you  received  an  A r t i c l e   15,  UCMJ,  dated  18  February  1992.  Copies  of  t h e  
documents  t o   be  forwarded  t o   t h e   separation  a u t h o r i t y   i n  support  o f  t h i s  
recommendation  a r e   attached.  The  commander  e x e r c i s i n g   SPCM  j u r i s d i c t i o n  o r  
a  higher  a u t h o r i t y   w i
i n  t h e   A i r   Force,  and  i f  you  a r e   discharged,  how  y o u r   s e r v i c e   w i
characterized.  If you  are  discharged,  you  w i
ment  i n  t h e   A i r   Force. 

l   be  i n e l i g i b l e   f o r   r e e n l i s t -  

l   be  discharged  o r   r e t a i n e d  

l   decide  whether  you  w i

l   be 

l

l

l

l

You  have  t h e   r i g h t   t o  c o n s u l t   counsel.  M i l  i t a r y  l e g a l   counsel  has  been 

3. 
obtained..to.-ass-is.t.wow,..  I have  made  an  appointment  f o r   you  t o  c o n s u l t  
Captain i 
a& j+,B  9 3  

i,  a t   Depot  1,  2nd  f l o o r ,   e x t e n s i o n   2015,  on 
hours.  You  may  c o n s u l t   c i v i l i a n  counsel  a t  your 

.-....-.-......-.-....~.- 

a t  1330 

own  expense. 

4.  You  have  t h e   r i g h t   t o   submit  statements  i n  y o u r   own  b e h a l f .   Any 
statements  you  want  t h e   s e p a r a t i o n   a u t h o r i t y   t o   c o n s i d e r   must  reach me  by 

28 F a q 2  z k  ( 5 0 0 ,  unless  you  request  and  r e c e i v e   an  e x t e n s i o n   f o r   good 

cause  shown.  I w i

l

l   send  them  t o   t h e   separation  a u t h o r i t y .  

5.  If you  f a i l   t o   c o n s u l t   counsel  o r   t o   submit  statements  'in  your  own 
behalf,  y o u r   f a i l u r e   w i l l   c o n s t i t u t e   a  waiver  o f  y o u r   r i g h t   t o  do  so, 

You  have  been  scheduled  f o r   a  medical  examination.  You  must  r e p o r t   t o  

6. 
t h e   G r i f f i s s   AFB  H o s p i t a l  , physical  exams  s e c t i o n   a t  OqOg  hours 
on ar\ FER  99 f o r   t h e   examination.  Uniform  of  t h e   day  i s   required. 

Any  personal  i n f o r m a t i o n  you  f u r n i s h   i n  r e b u t t a l   i s  covered  by  t h e  

7. 
Privacy  Act  Statement  as  explained  i n  AFR 39-10,  attachment  2. 
AFR  39-10  i s  a v a i l a b l e   f o r   y o u r   use  a t  t h e   416th  SUPS  U n i t   O r d e r l y   Room. 

A  copy  o f  

P e a c e .

.

 . . is o u r  P r o f e s s i o n  

-. 

8 .   Execute  the  attached  acknowledgment  and  r e t u r n   i t  t o  me 
,.....-  ....... c . * . . A i  ........... 

immediately. 

2 
--C bhlllldPl-de-f--------------------------' 

C r 

2  Atchs 
1.  Supporting  documents  f o r   t h e  

reason  f o r   discharge: 
AF  Form  3070,  18  Feb  92, 
w/6  Atchs : 
(1)  AF  Form  3070  Continuation 
Sheet 
( 2 )   Amn's  Response  t o   A r t i c l e  
15,  18  Feb  92 
( 3 )   Statement  o f   Financial 
Statys-. .. .-.-. .. , 
( 4 )   : ------------. 
92  Msg,  Subj:  U r i n a l y s i s  
Resu 1 t s  
( 5 )   Det  429  AFOSIICC  L t r ,  
11  Feb  92 
( 6 )   AF  Form  1168  (Amn's 
Statement),  5  Feb  92 
Pmn' s  Acknowledgment  of  LON 

:/AOTFR  1316072  Feb 

2. 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00141A

    Original file (FD2003-00141A.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The supervisors at hand did not offer positive mentoring, but told me the Air Force comes first, and that is the Air Force. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for Misconduct, Minor Disciplinary Infractions. For violating 24-hours quarters authorization, you received a LOR on 31 Mar 99, which was placed in your existing UIF on 13 Apr 99 (Atch 4, Tab 1).

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00280

    Original file (FD2005-00280.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board finds that neither tlic evidence of record nor tliat provided by tlie applicant substantiates an inequity or i~~tpropriety that would justify a change of discliarge ISSUE: The applicant submitted no written issues for tlie Board'? Attachment: Examiner's Rrief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AMN) (HGH A1C) 1. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this recommendation are attached.

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00362

    Original file (FD2006-00362.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 3 Nuv 9 2 , you were i n v i o l a t i o n of AFR 35-10. r e c e i v e d a L e t t e r of C o u n s e l i n g on 6 Nov 92 (Tab 1 - 1 0 ) . You must consult legal counsel before making a daei~ion to waive any of your rights. 23 Aug 9 1 , LOR/UIF; 2 J u l 92, MFR: 22 Sep 9 2 , LOC; 6 Oct 9 2 , LOC; 13 Gct 9 2 , LOR; 16 Oct 9 2 , LOC; 28 Oct 92, LOR/UIF/Control Roster; 2 Nov 9 2 , LOR; 4 Nov 92, MFR; 6 Nov 9 2 , LOC; 12 Nov 92, LOR 2 .

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0006

    Original file (FD2002-0006.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Attachment : Examiner's Brief I DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD FD2 0 02 - 0.0 0 6 (Former AB) (HGH AMN) 1. RECOMMENDATION: Respondent’s misconduct and unwillingness t o conform his H i s service behavior t o Air Force s t a n d a r d s support h i s immediate separation. c. Your duty performance was Substandard, This is evidenced by Letter of Reprimand, by the Commander, dated 5 May 92 (atch c).

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00444

    Original file (FD2005-00444.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance withlwithout counsel, and tlie right to submit an application to the AFBCMR Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: a. Enlisted as AB 22 Sep 87 for 4 yrs. (Change Discharge to Honorable) Issue 1: I am requesting that my discharge be upgraded.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01291-02

    Original file (01291-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F N A V A L R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 M E H : I ~ ~ Docker No: I I 111ne 2 0 0 2 l?O 1-02 (a) Title 10 0.S.C'. 1552 l'i~~-si~ant to the provisions of' refi'~-~nce I . Suhject Iicrciniit'ter rckrretl to as Petitioner, filed enclosure ( I ) with this Hoard requesting, i n ef'f'ect, that the applicaI>le naval I-ecortl be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone "13" Sclwti\v I

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00152

    Original file (FD2005-00152.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    - ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE PERSONAL APPEARANCE I 1 07 Dec 2005 APPLICANT'S ISSUE AND TXE BOARD'S DECISKlNAL RATIONAL ARE DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2005-00152 I I Case heard at Washington, D.C. MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used i i AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2004-00081

    Original file (FD2004-00081.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD 7 GRADE 1 AB I I . CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concluded that the applicant's punitive discharge by Special Court-Martial is appropriate undcr the facts and circumstances of this case and there is insufficient basis, as an act of clemency, for change of discharge. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH AlC) MISSING MEDICAL RECORDS 1.

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00429

    Original file (FD2005-00429.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, the DRB believed that had the applicant received timely financial counseling, the lenb.thy course of his check writing behavior may have been interrupted or corrected much earlier. E P R s : 3,3,3, ART 15: 1 Feb 89, Sheppard AFB, TX - Article 107. Approve t h e request f o r discharge, but d i r e c t t h a t Sgt; ---------------: service c h a r a c t e r i z a t i o n be e i t h e r honorabl e o r general under honorable conditions, reasons be given why the s e r v i c e c...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00042

    Original file (FD2005-00042.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ISSUE: Applicant received a General discharge for Misconduct--Commission of a Serious Offense Issue 1 : Applicant contends that he was young and immature. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH AlC) 1. I have been out of the United States Air Force for roughly thirteen years, but not a day goes by that I do not think about the good memories, and childish mistakes that I made.