AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAI,)
I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .
GRADE
AB
TYPE GEN
X
CoalNSEt
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
AI;SNISSAN
,----------------
----------------.
RECORD REVIEW
NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANILA r l O N
ADDRESS AND OR ORGANI/,A I ION OF COllNSEL
YES
No
X
I
I
MEMBER SITTING
-L
HON
--
I
VOTE OF T H E BOARD
GEN
I
I
I
.-
OTHER
I
DENY
EXHIBITS SIJBMlTTED TO THE BOARD
1
2
3
1 4
ORDER APPOINTING THE BOAKI)
AI'I'I.ICA'I'ION FOR REVIEW O F DISC1 IARCiF.
I,~I"I'F.R OF NO'I'IFICATION
1 L3RII-F C)F I'EItSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL'S REL,liASh '1.0 THE BOARD
ADDI'TIONAI, EXHIBITS SUBMITTED A'l' 'I'IME O F
PBRSONAI, APPEARANCE
'I'APE RECORDWG OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HE
1
I
1
I
I
b....................-..-..-.-..-.;
ISSllES
A93.01
INDEY NUMBER
A94.39
IIEARINC DATE
1 24 Apr 2007
I FD-2006-00406
I
APPLICANT'S ISSlJE hND THE BOARD'S DEClSlONAL KA7lONAl ARI: DISCIISSED ON THE A'll ACHED AIR FORCr DISCIIARCIT: REVIEW BOARD DEC*ISIONAL KATIONAl,F
Case heard in Washington, D.C.
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board and the right to si~btnit an application to the AFBCMR.
1 Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request.
10.
SAFIMRBR
550 C STRFI'T WPS'I. SlJl'l k 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 781 50-4742
INDORSEMENT
w
DATE: 511 1DUU7
b ROM
5LCHI:l AHV OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COIINC I1
AIRFORCE UlbCHAHGb HEV1F.W BOARD
1535COMMANI) OH. I;E
\VINC,3RD FLOOR
ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762.7002
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
(EF-V2)
Prcvious e d i t i o n will be used
A I R FORCE D I S C H A R G E R E V I E W B O A R D DECISIONAL R A T I O N A L E
C'ASF NL'MBER
FD-20U6-00406
GENERAL: The applica~it appeal? for upgrade of discliargc lo honorable.
The applicant appeared and testified beforc the Discharge Review Board (DRB), with counsel, at Andrews AFR on
24 Apr 2007.
The followi~ig additional exhibits were submitted at the hearing:
I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Exhibit #6: Letter from Mr. : ...-...,-.-..-. :
Exhibit #7: Character letter from: ...................... !of Parking Management, Tnc.
Exliibit #8: HANDS Program Progress Report
Exhibit #9: American Legion Statement
,--- ------------------
The attached brief contai~is available pertinelit data on the applicant and the factors leading to the diqchargc.
FINDINGS: Upgrade of d iscliarge is denied.
Tlie Board finds tliat neither tlie evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity or
impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.
Issue 1.
'I'lie applicant contends that his discharge was inequitable because it was an isolated incident. Tlie records
indicated the applica~it received an Article 15 on 18 Fcbruary 1992 for the wrongful possession and use of marijuana
on or about 22 January 1992. A search of tlie applicant's vehicle and liis dormitory roo111 uncovercd vegetable
appearing matter that tested positive for marijuana. Additionally, the applicant sub~nitted to a drug urilialysis screen
which confirnied the prcselice of the ~netabolite of ~nari-jua~ia (tetrahydrocannabinol) at a level above the Department
of Defense cut-off lcvel 15ngIml. While experimental usc of ~narijuana could be considcred a basis for an upgrade of
discharge, based upon tlie applicant's own testi~iio~iy of illegal drug use before, during, and after liis enlistment arid the
quantitics discovered in his possession, thc Board concluded that the applicant's use of marijuana on or about 22
January 2007 was not experimental. Additionally, the Board considered the possible cxiste~ice of a serious mental
disorder. i.e., psychotic disordcr or depressive disordcr. as documented in the applicant's post-service riiedical records,
which if present at the tiri~c lie com~nitted his offcnse, could have contributed to his poor judgment to use drugs.
However, the applicant admitted fraudulently feigning a nie~ital illncss for personal fi~ia~icial gain and ncver took his
prescribed medications.
Issue 2. The applica~it cited his prcvious immaturity and renewed desirc to "serve correctly and help [his] country" by
re-entering military service via the US Army; and to utilize his expcrie~ice with "computing and inventory
vnanagement." He also stated that lie lias "leanled from [his] dysfunctional life" and needs to live and practice thc core
values that the Army will offer him. TIowever, while the US Army may be willi~ig to waive tlic applicant's re-
enlistment code, the DRB detcr~nined that upgrading the discharge in this case is inappropriate.
Issue 3. The applicant also requested consideration of cleme~~cy
the "dead-end jobs" resulting fro111 his discharge. The DRB is not e~npowered to offer tlic applicant an upgradc under
the rules of"clemency" for the General, u~idcr Ho~iorable Conditions, service characterization he receivcd.
in liis case. citing tlie "stigma" he has suffered and
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concluded tliat the applicant's discharge was consistent with tlic
procedural and substantive require~ncnts o r tlie discharge regulation and was within the discrctio~i of the discharge
authority and tliat the applicant was provided full ad~ni~listrative due proccss.
I11 view of the foregoing findings, the Board further co~icludes that tlicre exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade
of discharge, tlius the applicant's discharge should not be changed.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brier
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
FD2006-00406A
.----------------------------------.
I (Former AB) (HGH AMN) (REHEARING)
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec'd a Gen Disch fr Griffiss AFB,
NY on 04 Mar 92. UP AFR 39-10, para 5-51 (Misconduct - Drug
Abuse). Appeals for Honorable Discharge.
2. OTHER FACTS:
a. See attached cy of Examiner's Brief dtd 03 Jul 02.
b. The AFDRB reviewed case on 21 Aug 02 (non-appearance w/o
counsel) & concluded applicant's discharge should not be changed.
3. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REHEARING: Appl (DD Fm 2 9 3 ) dtd 11 Oct
06. (Change Discharge to Honorable)
Issues: My discharge was inequitable because it was an isolated
incident.
Atch
None.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS RFB, MD
(Former AB) (HGH AMN)
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec'd a GEN Disch fr USAF 92/03/04 UP AFR 39-10,
para 5-51 (Misconduct - Drug Abuse). Appeals for Honorable Disch.
2. BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 71/06/15. Enlmt Age: 19 1/12. Disch Age: 20 8/12. Educ:HS DIPL.
AFQT: N/A. A-74, E-36, G-53, M-27. PAFSC: 64530 - Inventory Management
Specialist. DAS: 91/11/02.
b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 90/08/02 - 91/07/16 (11 months 15 days) (Inactive).
3 . SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Enlisted as AB 91/07/17 for 4 yrs. Svd: 00 Yrs 07 Mo 18 Das, all AMS.
b. Grade Status: AB - 92/02/18 (Article 15, 92/02/18)
AMN - 92/01/17
c. Time Lost: none.
d. Art 15's: (1) 92/02/18, Griffiss AFB, NY - Article 112a. You did, on
or about 22 Jan 92, wrongfully possess about 6 grams of
marijuana. Article L12a. You did, on or about 22 Jan
92, wrongfully use marijuana. Reduction to AB, and
forfeiture of $200.00 pay per month for one month.
(No appeal) (No mitigation)
e. Additional: none.
f. CM: none
g. Record of SV: none.
(Discharged from Griffiss AFB)
h. Awards & Decs: AFTR.
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (01) Yrs (07) Mos (03) Das
TAMS: (00) Yrs (07) Mos (18) Das
4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 02/03/17.
(Change Discharge to Honorable)
Issue 1: I was immature at the time. If I had another chance I will serve
admirably.
ATCH
none.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
@
416TH LOGISTICS (3ROUP (SAC)
QRIFFIGS AIR FORCE BASE, NEW YORK 13441-6000
f ~ d - d d Y 8 6
RLrLv TO
ATTN Of:
CC
Z 6 FEB 10s
. u m J L ~ ~ : L e t t e r o f N o t i f i c a t i o n - Discharge Under t h e P r o v i s i o n s o f AFR 39-10
T o AB i
................................................
....-.-....-.-.....-----------------------------
: 416 SUPS
: ,
1, I am recommending y o u r discharge from the United States A i r Force f o r
misconduct - drug abuse.
paragraph 5-51.
c h a r a c t e r i z e d as e i t h e r honorable o r general. I am recommending t h a t your
s e r v i c e be c h a r a c t e r i z e d as general.
I f my recommendation i s approved, your s e r v i c e w ' i l l be
'The a u t h o r i t y f o r t h i s a c t i o n i s AFR 39-10,
2. My reasons f o r t h i s a c t i o n a r e y o u r wrongful possession and use of
marijuana a t G r i f f i s s AFB, New York, on o r about 22 January 1992, f o r which
you received an A r t i c l e 15, UCMJ, dated 18 February 1992. Copies of t h e
documents t o be forwarded t o t h e separation a u t h o r i t y i n support o f t h i s
recommendation a r e attached. The commander e x e r c i s i n g SPCM j u r i s d i c t i o n o r
a higher a u t h o r i t y w i
i n t h e A i r Force, and i f you a r e discharged, how y o u r s e r v i c e w i
characterized. If you are discharged, you w i
ment i n t h e A i r Force.
l be i n e l i g i b l e f o r r e e n l i s t -
l be discharged o r r e t a i n e d
l decide whether you w i
l be
l
l
l
l
You have t h e r i g h t t o c o n s u l t counsel. M i l i t a r y l e g a l counsel has been
3.
obtained..to.-ass-is.t.wow,.. I have made an appointment f o r you t o c o n s u l t
Captain i
a& j+,B 9 3
i, a t Depot 1, 2nd f l o o r , e x t e n s i o n 2015, on
hours. You may c o n s u l t c i v i l i a n counsel a t your
.-....-.-......-.-....~.-
a t 1330
own expense.
4. You have t h e r i g h t t o submit statements i n y o u r own b e h a l f . Any
statements you want t h e s e p a r a t i o n a u t h o r i t y t o c o n s i d e r must reach me by
28 F a q 2 z k ( 5 0 0 , unless you request and r e c e i v e an e x t e n s i o n f o r good
cause shown. I w i
l
l send them t o t h e separation a u t h o r i t y .
5. If you f a i l t o c o n s u l t counsel o r t o submit statements 'in your own
behalf, y o u r f a i l u r e w i l l c o n s t i t u t e a waiver o f y o u r r i g h t t o do so,
You have been scheduled f o r a medical examination. You must r e p o r t t o
6.
t h e G r i f f i s s AFB H o s p i t a l , physical exams s e c t i o n a t OqOg hours
on ar\ FER 99 f o r t h e examination. Uniform of t h e day i s required.
Any personal i n f o r m a t i o n you f u r n i s h i n r e b u t t a l i s covered by t h e
7.
Privacy Act Statement as explained i n AFR 39-10, attachment 2.
AFR 39-10 i s a v a i l a b l e f o r y o u r use a t t h e 416th SUPS U n i t O r d e r l y Room.
A copy o f
P e a c e .
.
. . is o u r P r o f e s s i o n
-.
8 . Execute the attached acknowledgment and r e t u r n i t t o me
,.....- ....... c . * . . A i ...........
immediately.
2
--C bhlllldPl-de-f--------------------------'
C r
2 Atchs
1. Supporting documents f o r t h e
reason f o r discharge:
AF Form 3070, 18 Feb 92,
w/6 Atchs :
(1) AF Form 3070 Continuation
Sheet
( 2 ) Amn's Response t o A r t i c l e
15, 18 Feb 92
( 3 ) Statement o f Financial
Statys-. .. .-.-. .. ,
( 4 ) : ------------.
92 Msg, Subj: U r i n a l y s i s
Resu 1 t s
( 5 ) Det 429 AFOSIICC L t r ,
11 Feb 92
( 6 ) AF Form 1168 (Amn's
Statement), 5 Feb 92
Pmn' s Acknowledgment of LON
:/AOTFR 1316072 Feb
2.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00141A
The supervisors at hand did not offer positive mentoring, but told me the Air Force comes first, and that is the Air Force. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for Misconduct, Minor Disciplinary Infractions. For violating 24-hours quarters authorization, you received a LOR on 31 Mar 99, which was placed in your existing UIF on 13 Apr 99 (Atch 4, Tab 1).
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00280
The Board finds that neither tlic evidence of record nor tliat provided by tlie applicant substantiates an inequity or i~~tpropriety that would justify a change of discliarge ISSUE: The applicant submitted no written issues for tlie Board'? Attachment: Examiner's Rrief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AMN) (HGH A1C) 1. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this recommendation are attached.
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00362
On 3 Nuv 9 2 , you were i n v i o l a t i o n of AFR 35-10. r e c e i v e d a L e t t e r of C o u n s e l i n g on 6 Nov 92 (Tab 1 - 1 0 ) . You must consult legal counsel before making a daei~ion to waive any of your rights. 23 Aug 9 1 , LOR/UIF; 2 J u l 92, MFR: 22 Sep 9 2 , LOC; 6 Oct 9 2 , LOC; 13 Gct 9 2 , LOR; 16 Oct 9 2 , LOC; 28 Oct 92, LOR/UIF/Control Roster; 2 Nov 9 2 , LOR; 4 Nov 92, MFR; 6 Nov 9 2 , LOC; 12 Nov 92, LOR 2 .
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0006
Attachment : Examiner's Brief I DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD FD2 0 02 - 0.0 0 6 (Former AB) (HGH AMN) 1. RECOMMENDATION: Respondent’s misconduct and unwillingness t o conform his H i s service behavior t o Air Force s t a n d a r d s support h i s immediate separation. c. Your duty performance was Substandard, This is evidenced by Letter of Reprimand, by the Commander, dated 5 May 92 (atch c).
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00444
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance withlwithout counsel, and tlie right to submit an application to the AFBCMR Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: a. Enlisted as AB 22 Sep 87 for 4 yrs. (Change Discharge to Honorable) Issue 1: I am requesting that my discharge be upgraded.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01291-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F N A V A L R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 M E H : I ~ ~ Docker No: I I 111ne 2 0 0 2 l?O 1-02 (a) Title 10 0.S.C'. 1552 l'i~~-si~ant to the provisions of' refi'~-~nce I . Suhject Iicrciniit'ter rckrretl to as Petitioner, filed enclosure ( I ) with this Hoard requesting, i n ef'f'ect, that the applicaI>le naval I-ecortl be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone "13" Sclwti\v I
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00152
- ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE PERSONAL APPEARANCE I 1 07 Dec 2005 APPLICANT'S ISSUE AND TXE BOARD'S DECISKlNAL RATIONAL ARE DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2005-00152 I I Case heard at Washington, D.C. MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used i i AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2004-00081
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD 7 GRADE 1 AB I I . CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concluded that the applicant's punitive discharge by Special Court-Martial is appropriate undcr the facts and circumstances of this case and there is insufficient basis, as an act of clemency, for change of discharge. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH AlC) MISSING MEDICAL RECORDS 1.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00429
Additionally, the DRB believed that had the applicant received timely financial counseling, the lenb.thy course of his check writing behavior may have been interrupted or corrected much earlier. E P R s : 3,3,3, ART 15: 1 Feb 89, Sheppard AFB, TX - Article 107. Approve t h e request f o r discharge, but d i r e c t t h a t Sgt; ---------------: service c h a r a c t e r i z a t i o n be e i t h e r honorabl e o r general under honorable conditions, reasons be given why the s e r v i c e c...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00042
ISSUE: Applicant received a General discharge for Misconduct--Commission of a Serious Offense Issue 1 : Applicant contends that he was young and immature. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH AlC) 1. I have been out of the United States Air Force for roughly thirteen years, but not a day goes by that I do not think about the good memories, and childish mistakes that I made.