AIR FORCE 3OAFID FOR C0RRE:CTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF FZOCEEDINGS
IN THE MATTER OF:
33CKET NUMBER: 9 7 4 1 7 4 9
C3UNSEL: NONE
5ZARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REOUESTS THAT:
He be reimbursed f o r experses to move his sail-boat under
( u s i ~ g the
provisions of a Governmerx procured movement
personally procured transpormticn method) vice a Eo-It-Yourself
(DITY) move.
APPLICANT CONTENDS T H T :
___
STATZMENT OF FACTS :
he requested that ills
and t a k e n E O
ILTT cited t h e pertkient paragraphs in t h e Joint F e d e r a i ? - r a v e l
Regulations ( J F T R ) a u t h o r i z i n g the shipmenc, such as a bsat, E S a
weight a d d i E i v e as p a r t of c h e
r i e t w e i g h t sf t h e s h i p m e n t ;
p r c v i d i n g fcr tne rnoTi:ement cf a bsat ur,de- a doxzstic one-t:Ly.e-
or,ih; (OTO) _rate or under the E!ITh' method; p r ~ v
l r l g gulaanee
.
.
*
,
.
arranging for transportation of iisgsehold Goods ( 3 H C - j at personal
expense; and providing for a D I T move with payment af a monetary
allowance.
ILTT stated that review of the circumstances surrounding the
erestea in s h l p p l 1 - 1 ~
If- he elected to
would be subject to
The option of either shi
move the boa
the boat to
excess costs.
using the shipping documents prepared by
AFB using the
rate method or a D I T Y xove wzs expla
to the applicanc.
According to a DD Form 1299, Application For Shipment And/@r
Storage of Personal Property, dated 30 July 1996, the applicant
wzs willing to make his own arraqements to move the bo
R o t want to perform a DITY move. However, records at
contain a conpleted DD Form 2278, Application F o r Co-
and Counseling Checkhst, dated IC! August 1996, indiczcing t h e
applicaEt's intent to move his boat using the DITY proqrarn. 3-2
estimated gross incentive cf $2,4a8, was cal
00 lbs. r-.s-;ing from
boat,
'iL"
AFB,
wance of $1,806, a partial payment of the S 2 , E C F
He submitted a final travel V G G C ~ ~ L - CY.
ana was paid :ne remairlng am,-unt af $I-?.
DITTY
1 G September 1996,
: z f t e r Feaeral tax) on 23 Septepker 1996.
ILT? indicated that : h i s Is not :he first time the app1icar.r p a s
T h e apglicant received an advz.r,ze
incentive.
:Re
uestlon He previously
AFB after h i s return fro
:l-l
1335.
- _
ILTT stated tha: the applicant persmally p
pany to move h i s boat from
at a tatzi COS: zf $3,355,
$895 f a r accessorlai charges. Once :he n o ~ e T ~ - ~ L
The rernaLn1ng iricentive paid a x not :ncl:de
completed, the apphcant f i n a l x e d his Travel 'VToucher
zc
co, - e c t e d the remalnlncj CTTY ir-certive owed hirr zs indlczzec
abcve ',$1;9.2C1 .
the $895 accessorlai charges as :n accordance with the J Z T ? -
these are non-reimbursable c a a r g e s .
ILTT stated that in accordance w i t n the JFTF, a n a AFT 24-5l:j:,
appLicant was paid a cash incenciT:e of $2,408 basec on t h e ;+:E_---
3f
to
z r E T d T e l voucher were not reimbursed.
requesting reimbursement fcr a sel5-procured transportation ~ ~ 3 v e
which would entltle him to rermbursement for such c c s t s n o t ts
exceed the cost which would have been incurred by the Governmer:.
bs. f o r a 31TY move from
The accessorial charge
The appllcart is :--c+-
-.ls
- 7
i
37-,217
45
ILTT stated that after a thorough review of the records, they can
find no evidence of miscounseling or an error on the part of the
Thus, ILTT recommended the application be denied
Government.
(Exhibit C ) .
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on
27 April 1998 f o r review and response. As of this date, no
response has been received by this office (Exhibit D) .
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3 . Insufficient relevant evider-ce has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice. After
a t h o r o u g h review of the evidence of record and applicant s
submission, we are unpersuaded that he should be reimbursed
additional expenses for moving his sailboat. His contentions are
duly noted; however, we do not f i n d these assertions, in and by
themselves, sufficiently pers-aasive to override the rationale
provided by the Air Force. We therefore agree with the opiniox
and recommendation of the A i - Force and adopt the ra5ionale
expressed as the basis for OUL- dezision that t h e applicant has
failed to sustain his burden t h a t F-2 has suffered either an error
or an injustice.
Therefore, we find no compelling basis to
recommend granting the relief souqlnr in this application.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
T h e applicant be notified that tile evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice; that the applicaticn was denied without a personal
appearance; and that the applicatim will only be reconsidered
upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this applicatiori.
The following members of the Hoard considered this application in
Executive Session on 11 August 1 9 3 E , under- the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
Mr. Douglas 3. Heady, Panel Chair
Mr. Joseph G . Diamond, Member
Mr. Henry RGmG Jr., Member
3
97 -01749
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 6 Jun 97, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ USAF/ILTT, dated 14 Apr 98, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 27 Apr 98.
DOUGLAS J. HEADY
Panel Chair
4
97-01749
Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-0 1 104 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and AFI 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: Larch 1998; and competent authority approved his DD Form 2278, Application for Do-It-Yourself P I T Y ) Move and Counseling Checklist, dated...
ZSLJNSEL: None - ZECORD OF PZOZEEDINGS - IN THE MATTER G'F: AIR FORCE EGARD FOR CORREZTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 3CCKET NUMBER: 98-01667 DEC 1 0 G* HEARING DESIRED: NO Applicanz r e q u e s t s award of a? evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opir_:on to the Board recommending the applicacion be denled (Exhiblt : I . The advisory opinion was (Exhibit D) .
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00017
Information was extracted from the Legal Review) LOR, LOR, LOC, 21 JAN 04 - 08 SEP 03 - 22 FEB 02 - LOR, LOR, LOR, LOC, LOC, 05 NOV 01 - 21 AUG 01 - 21 AUG 01 - 18 JUN 01 - 14 FEB 01 - Financial irresponsibility. On 5 Jan 04, an investigation revealed L11dAnn i ~&shunurabiy fdcd iv pay iis Military Star Card debt, for which he wj3 given a Lettor 6Fiiphand (LOR), dated 2 1 Jan 04, which was filed in his Personnel Information File (PIF). Direct that the respondent bo discharged from the Air...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00347
NAME O F SERVICE MEMBER (I.ASr, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) ......................... '..-..-..-..-..-..-------I TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE SSGT I X RECORD REVIEW AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD 1 AFSNISSAN , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - a NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORCAN17ATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION O F COUNSEL I I MEMBER SITTING ,." (Change Discharge to Honorable, and Change the RE Code, Reason for Discharge) ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF. I f t h e r...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRFCTION OF MILITARY RECORDS d A S H l N G T 0 N DC 20330-1 430 AFBCMR 93-02346 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Regulation 31-3, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction bf Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinent mi partment of the Air Force relating to be...
1 s i ., I Office of the Assistant Secretary \1 BC'JlR 98-00007 AIR FORCE BOLL-RD FOP- C O k A ? wclu:d bz a u t h o r i z e d to r e t u r n t o Germany 111 a rwpoi-a:-y d u t y (TDY) s t ; i t u s t o complete z s h i p his EX-*' and HHGs to h i s new d u t y n e c e s s a r y He was a d v i s e d t h a t k I?-auld n o t be s t a t i o n k F Z i . 3 J and H H G s LC h i s new d u t y n e c e s s a r l r a c t i o n s A F B ) aiic -,&:as a d v i s e d t h a t h e would n o t be s t a t l...
___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and provided a response which is attached at Exhibit D. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. Applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, after thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their...
discovered the absence of an AF E'orrr 63 in his records upon receipt of that RIP; however, that ;s irzelevant to The issue that h e i n c u r e d the A D S C . However, we do not find his uncorroborated contentions, in and by themselves, sufficiently compelling to conclude that he unwittingly incurred an ADSC for training he would not have accepted had he been aware of the ADSC prior to entering the training. Exhibit B.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 06956-98
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY . Y o u a r e a d v i s e d t h a t r e c o n s i d e r a t i o n o f t h e c a s e w i l l b e g r a n t e d o n l y u p o n t h e p r e s e n t a t i o n o f n e w a n d m a t e r i a l e v i d e n c e n o t p r e v i o u s l y c o n s i d e r e d b y t h e B o a r d a n d t h e n , o n l y u p o n t h e r e c o m m e n d a t i o n o f t h e B o a r d a n d a p p r o v a l b y t h e A s s i s t a n t S e c r e t a r y DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY RECORDS 18 1. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01251-99
s h i p ' s m o v e m e n t o n t w o o c c a s i o n s , m i s s i n g m u s t e r s a n d d i s o b e d i e n c e . B a s e d o n t h e f o r e g o i n g r e c o r d y o u w e r e p r o c e s s e d f o r a n a d m i n i s t r a t i v e d i s c h a r g e . O n 6 M a r c h 1 9 7 9 y o u a g r e e d t o w a i v e y o u r r i g h t t o a n a d m i n i s t r a t i v e d i s c h a r g e b o a r d i n e x c h a n g e f o r a r e c o m m e n d a t i o n f o r a g e n e r a l d i s c h a r g e .