A I R FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION O F M I L I T A R Y RECORDS
RECORD O F PROCEEDINGS
JUL 2 2 8%
I N THE MATTER O F :
ZCZKET NUMBER:
97--02842
CO2JNSEL:
NONE
i i E A R I N G DESIRED:
PJO
-________.
APPLICANT REOUESTS THAT:
r e s u l t sf
H i s A c t i v e Cluty S e r v i c e Commitment
h i s c o m p l e t i n g t h e T- 38 Pilot X n s t r u c t o r T r a i n i n g ( P I T ) be d e l e t e d .
IADSC) x c u r r e d a s a
A P P L I C A N T CONTENDS THAT:
When
c o u n s e l e d o n t h e 3 6 - m o n t h c o m m i t m x t .
h e w a s n o t i f i e d o f
h i s
,zxz-rent
c i s s i g n m e n t ,
h e was
n o t
A p p l i c a n t ’ s s t a t e m e n t a n d d o c u m e n t c r ; , e v i d e n c e submytted i n supp:ort
i n c l u d e d a s E x h i b i t A with A t t a c h m e n t s 1
o f h i s application a r e
t h r c u g n E .
STATEMENT 3 F FACTS:
A p p l i c a n t c o m p l e t e d T-38 P I T c;t-
J.?B
i n c u r r i n g a t h r e e - y e a r ADSC of L9 :.‘z.,rch 1995.
on 20 Plarcrl 1 9 9 6 ,
A I R FORCE EVALUATION:
of
t n e ADSC.
t h e
r a t h e r , h e c i t e s sirrLpl17 tL?e l a c k cf d o c m e r t a t ; o n of his
HQ A F P C / T ) P P R S e x p l a i n s t h e r e a s o n ?
estcklisknent of A D S C s
f l y i n g t r a i n i n g a n d r e c o m m e n a s t n a t --he app-icztlon ~e g e n i e a .
i s i n d i c a t e c i t h a t a p p l i c a n t 3 0 ~ s :’:ST ciain “ n o i n i n g the Air Force
to provide counseling
- r
I f
~
d. In interDretinq this z c 1 i r s d e c i s l c i T , A F ? ( ' / J G , nas s c ; l t e a
that the decision must be f o L c m e 2 gn-y in + n e district where :E
was rendered. Moreover, this c c , r t decisian A s n c t Dind;ng an ;is
ir, any manner. Nevertheless, in their view, the c a s e may b e cited
as persuasive authoriry ithht i L 3 , the recison;na
1s sounc and
emanates fron a distinguishea redera1 x i i r t )
f o r two basic
propositions:
( 1 ) Pxrsuant to AFR 36-51/Li,FI 36-2-. : - , tht; absence cf an
t h c ' absence ~f evidence o,t A C S C
Air Force Form 63 and e v e n
counseling do not compel t h e invaiidation of 2: 4DS'.
{:2) Evidence chat an o f f ; c e r
benefiTn2 :rf:rti
acted unreasonably ir. tailinq EO inTiestigate
are valid reasons for denial of an A C S C appedl.
c r a i r , i n q anu
L e n g t h of his ADS(:
in deference to the opinion 31 t h e S t a f f J u J q - P C ~ J :ate, ~ F F I : ,
t h e
legal r i q h t tc 'kle relief Deing
applicant does not appear to have ;I
of ~ ' r z p e r zounsellng by
sought notwithstanding the abseIi.cct
responsible Air Force Off icia- s. Xcwever, S L Y CP i ~ ~ ~ c - z r e emFowered
to recommend relief based on our perception of an injustice, the
lack of a legal entitlement is n o t dispositive of the merits of the
applicant's case.
4. Applicant's contentions are du-y noted.
However, we do not
find his uncorroborated contentions, in and by themselves,
sufficiently compelling to conclude that he unwittingly incurred an
ADSC for training he would not have accepted had he been aware of
the ADSC prior to entering the training. Therefore, we agree with
the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt its rationale as the
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has failed to sustain
his burden of establishlng the existence of either an error or an
rnjustice.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that tne evidence presentec did not
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or irqustlce;
that the appiicatior-1 was deniea 16::~hout a personal appearance; ana
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission
of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
The following members of the Ejoara considered this application in
Executive Session on 26 Jur-e 1 5 3 E under the prIvlsions of AFT
36-2603:
Mr, LeRoy T. Baseman, Panel C h a i r
M r ' Benedict A . Kausal I I T r :.:errher
M Y . David M , Mklq,rewp Mernner
The following documentary e v i d e x e ihias considezea:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, aatec 20 Sep 97, w/atcns.
Exhibit B. Applicant's MasteT- - tiersonnei Records.
Exhibit C. Lett?z-, AFPC,'3PPRS, dated 23 Apr 98, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MiEX, dated 18 May 98.
Exhibit E , Letter, Applizant, Jcdated.
vQ57L
LEROY T. BASEMAN
Panel Chair
&&~'A4-----
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was not made aware of nor did he acknowledge acceptance of the three-year ADSC for completion of Initial Qualification Training (IQT) in the C-9. While documentation of the officer's awareness of the ADSC provides ironclad proof the counseling was accomplished in a timely manner and the officer voluntarily accepted the ADSC, it is not the documentation of counseling that establishes the ADSC, but rather the completion of the ADSC- incurring event (in this case,...
1 s i ., I Office of the Assistant Secretary \1 BC'JlR 98-00007 AIR FORCE BOLL-RD FOP- C O k A ? wclu:d bz a u t h o r i z e d to r e t u r n t o Germany 111 a rwpoi-a:-y d u t y (TDY) s t ; i t u s t o complete z s h i p his EX-*' and HHGs to h i s new d u t y n e c e s s a r y He was a d v i s e d t h a t k I?-auld n o t be s t a t i o n k F Z i . 3 J and H H G s LC h i s new d u t y n e c e s s a r l r a c t i o n s A F B ) aiic -,&:as a d v i s e d t h a t h e would n o t be s t a t l...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01368
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01295-99
c o u r t - m a r t i a l c o n v i c t i o n a n d t h e p o t e n t i a l p e n a l t i e s o f a p u n i t i v e d i s c h a r g e a n d c o n f i n e m e n t a t h a r d l a b o r . Y o u w e r e d i s c h a r g e d o n 2 0 A u g u s t 1 9 7 4 . 1 9 9 9 .
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 06956-98
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY . Y o u a r e a d v i s e d t h a t r e c o n s i d e r a t i o n o f t h e c a s e w i l l b e g r a n t e d o n l y u p o n t h e p r e s e n t a t i o n o f n e w a n d m a t e r i a l e v i d e n c e n o t p r e v i o u s l y c o n s i d e r e d b y t h e B o a r d a n d t h e n , o n l y u p o n t h e r e c o m m e n d a t i o n o f t h e B o a r d a n d a p p r o v a l b y t h e A s s i s t a n t S e c r e t a r y DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY RECORDS 18 1. ...
After careful of applicant’s zsquest and the available evidence csrsid3ra:icn sf z z c a r d , -;;z find no evidence :hat the applicant’s d i s c k z r g e :hias A7c7,” 2°F L , afz3.f ~s-~siaering the facts zxd circumstances l e a d i r i g zz z r ~ e a p ~ l i z z r - : ’ s separation and -:-Fw of the fact t k L a t , ~::z;e: c u r r e r , t standards, the applica:? iliamond, Member Ms. Sophie A. \:;ark, Mernber F i l l members v o t e d to correct the records, as recommended.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01251-99
s h i p ' s m o v e m e n t o n t w o o c c a s i o n s , m i s s i n g m u s t e r s a n d d i s o b e d i e n c e . B a s e d o n t h e f o r e g o i n g r e c o r d y o u w e r e p r o c e s s e d f o r a n a d m i n i s t r a t i v e d i s c h a r g e . O n 6 M a r c h 1 9 7 9 y o u a g r e e d t o w a i v e y o u r r i g h t t o a n a d m i n i s t r a t i v e d i s c h a r g e b o a r d i n e x c h a n g e f o r a r e c o m m e n d a t i o n f o r a g e n e r a l d i s c h a r g e .
AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00034
4 AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-01-00034 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. Records review revealed that the applicant received an Article 15 for wronghlly using marijuana on or about April 30, 1985 and a second Article 15 for failure to obey a lawhl order while in correctional custody. Today I have prescribe medication Also, there is a letter from my therapist Dr. ------ Please - ATCH 1.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01670-99
; h e B o a r d f i n d s t h e e x i s t e n c e o f a n f o l l o w i n g c o r r e c t i v e a c t i o n . a n d e s p e c i a l l y i n l i g h t o f t h e i n j u s t i c e w a r r a n t i n g t h e ( Z ) , P e t i t i o n e r O s a p p l i c a t i o n h a s c o m m e n t e d t o t h e e f f e c t t h a t t h e r e q u e s t h a s m e r i t a n d w a r r a n t s f a v o r a b l e a c t i o n . ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00513-99
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ( 2 ) , t h e B o a r d f i n d s t h e e x i s t e n c e o f a n f o l l o w i n g c o r r e c t i v e a c t i o n . ...