NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) 

GRADE 

AFSNISSAN 

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD 

I 

I 

MEMBER SITTING 

1 
2 
3 
4 

ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 
LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 
BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE 
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD 
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF 
PERSONAL APPEARANCE 
I I  TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE 

1 

HEARING DATE 

19 Apr 2004 

Case heard at Ft. Gillem, GA, via video-teleconference with Andrews AFB, MD. 

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR. 

TO: 

C/ 

SAF/MRB R 
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 

I FROM: 

SECRETARY OF TEE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL 
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 
1 9 5  COMMAND D R  EC WING. 3RD FLOOR 
ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 

Previous edition will be used 

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE 

CASE NUMBER 

FD-2003-0052, 

GENERAL:  The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable and to change his reenlistment 
code. 

The applicant appeared and testified before the Discharge Review Board (DRB), with counsel, at Fort 
Gillem, Georgia, via video-teleconference with Andrews AFB, MD, on January 22,2001. 

The attached brief contains the available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the 
discharge. 

FINDINGS:  Upgrade of discharge and change of reenlistment code are denied. 

The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an 
inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge. 

ISSUES: 

Issue 1.  Applicant contends discharge was inequitable because it was too harsh, and notes that he was 
generally a good service member who was close to the end of his enlistment.  The records indicated the 
applicant received four Letters of Reprimand, seven Records of Individual Counseling, one Memorandum 
for Record, two Articles 15, and had an Unfavorable Information File.  There were also four additional 
documents regarding misconduct.  Applicant's infractions included numerous instances of failing to support 
his dependent daughter, financial irresponsibility, dereliction of duty, missing scheduled appointments, 
dress and appearance violations, failing to return government furniture, and then returning it damaged.  Of 
his three Enlisted Performance Reports, his final one was a referral "1"  noting many performance 
deficiencies which had not improved after counseling.  Member was also seen at the Mental Health Clinic 
and the Family Advocacy Program over a 9-month period due to marital and family problems.  Member felt 
he was treated unfairly because his offenses were minor.  The Board opined that through the unit's 
numerous administrative actions, the applicant had ample opportunities to improve his negative 
performance and was unable or unwilling to do so.  The Board concluded the extensive misconduct was a 
significant departure fiom conduct expected of all military members, and the characterization of the 
discharge received by the applicant was therefore appropriate. 

Issue 2.  Applicant contends his misconduct was related to his youth, immaturity, low aptitude scores and 
learning difficulties.  The Board noted that applicant was age 20 to 23 when his misconduct occurred, 
essentially the same age as other first term airmen who adhere to the standards expected of them and 
successfully complete their enlistments.  The Board could not substantiate this contention and finds it 
without merit. 

Issue 3.  Applicant notes his former wife had a drug and alcohol problem that adversely impacted the family 
and thus member's performance also.  The Board recognized that these problems may have contributed to 
some of his misconduct, but because he was unable to separate those problems fiom his duties, he became 
an administrative burden to his unit and a disruptive influence on morale and discipline.  The Board further 
did not find that these problems were of sufficient mitigation to explain all of his extensive misconduct, and 
thus to warrant an upgrade. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 

AIR  FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW  BOARD 

ANDREWS AFB,  MD 

(Former A1C)  (HGH SRA) 

1.  MATTER UNDER REVIEW:  Appl rec'd  a GEN Disch fr USAF 7 Jun 90 UP AFR 39-10, 
para 5-46 (Misconduct -  Minor Disciplinary Infractions).  Appeals for Honorable 
Discharge and Change to Reentry Code. 

2 .   BACKGROUND : 

a. DOB: 18 Nov 67.  Enlmt Age: 19 3/12.  Disch Age: 23 5/12. Educ: HS DIPL. 

AFQT: N/A.  A-53,  E-51,  G-39,  M-29. PAFSC: 70250 -  Information Management 
Specialist. DAS: 17 May 87. 

b.  Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 16 Apr 86 -  5 Jan 87 (8 Months 21 Days) (Inactive). 

3.  SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: 

a.  Enld as AB  6 Jan 87 for 6 yrs. Svd: 3 Yrs 5 Mos 2 Das, all AMS. 

b.  Grade Status:  A1C -  24 Apr 90 (Article 15, 24 Apr 90) 

SRA  -  20 Jun 89 
AlC -  20 Feb 87 

c.  Time Lost:  None. 

d.  Art 15's:  (1) 24 Apr 90, Eielson AFB, Alaska -  Article 108.  You did, 
between on or about 25' May 89 and on or about 16 Apr 90, 
without authority, through neglect damage one dining 
chair, two single mattresses and box springs, one double 
mattress and box spring, and one dresser, military 
property of the United States, the amount of said 
damages being in the sum of $861.89.  Reduction to AlC. 
(Appeal/Denied) (No mitigation) 

(2) 20 Oct 89, Eielson AFB, Alaska -  Article 86.  You did, 
on or about 12 Oct 89, without authority, fail to go at 
the time prescribed to your appointed place of duty. 
Suspended reduction to AlC, and suspended forfeiture of 
$100.00 pay per month for two months.  (No appeal) (No 
mitigation) 

e.  Additional: LOR, 18 APR 90 -  Financial irresponsibility. 

MFR, 30 NOV 89 -  Failure to meet dress and appearance 

LTR, 03 OCT 89 -  Failure to turn-in excess govt furniture. 
LTR, 15 SEP 89 -  Failure to provide financial support to 

standards. 

RIC, 11 SEP 89 -  Missing scheduled appointments. 

dependent daughter. 

LOR, 
RIC, 
RIC, 
RIC, 

31 AUG 8 9   - Dereliction of duty. 
30 AUG 8 9   - Dereliction of duty. 
30 AUG 8 9   - Dereliction of duty. 
24 AUG 8 9   -  Failure to provide support for dependent 

daughter. 

LOR, 
LOR, 
RIC, 
RIC, 

18 JUL 8 9   - Missing scheduled appointment. 
12 JUL  8 9   -  Late for scheduled appointment. 
12 JUL 89 -  Unauthorized extended lunch break. 
08 JUN 8 9   -  Violation of dress and appearance 

standards. 

RIC, 
LTR , 

26 APR  8 9   -  Failure to report as directed. 
20 NOV 88  -  Failure to provide financial support to 

dependent daughter. 

LTR , 

1 8   MAR  88  -  Writing worthless checks. 

f.  CM:  None.6 Jan 8 7  
g.  Record of SV: 6 Jan 8 7   -  5 Jan 88  Eielson AFB  8   (Annual) 
6 Jan 8 8   -  5 Jan 8 9   Eielson AFB  7   (Annual) 
6 Jan 8 9   -  5 Jan 90  Eielson AFB  1  (Annua1)REF 

(Discharged from Eielson AFB) 

h.  Awards &  Decs:  AFTR, AFOUA, AFOSLTR. 

i.  Stmt of Sv:  TMS:  (4) Yrs  (1) Mos  (23) Das 
TAMS:  ( 3 )   Yrs  ( 5 )   Mos  '(2) Das 

4 .   B A S I S   ADVANCED FOR REVIEW:  Appln  (DD Fm 293) dtd 11 Nov 03. 

(Upgrade Discharge to Honorable and Change Reentry Code) 

ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF 

ATCH 
1. Applicant's Issues. 
2. Personal References. 

17 Dec 03/cr 

luiii'7:a~ 

The fsj!e.,;-- 

-.-.-  --- 
!=3tiY3 41 F the  CZ230ii5 1  beiievz my discharge shouid 
17 you disag~ee, piesse  e x p ! a w j  !pay  ~ 3 2  

Dear 
bz unnraded tg fian;jrabf;- 
disagree.  I  he prestirmption of regularity that might t?arrnaily gemit you to 
assume that the sergice acted correct& iii charaderking my sz~jice as less than 
I. r l ~ n ~ r a b i e  dogs ifat S Q ~ / Y  t~;;. my caa$ bsca~se gf the  gjidgnee  i  am submittii~g, 

Pa  - 

My di~i;hzrgje i m s  baszd on maiiy offimsss,  but they Yere ofriy mmjn~r 
of-i2:nsesA m; punishment  1  grit at s y  discharge s - s  too harsh.  9 ~ s  
understand the fuli eofiseqrrer-rces of these actions.  Not k~mwing this discharge 
~.@u!d effect my Gi Bjil to pay f ~ r  ca!i@ge, f  g ~ a i w  far ~ijery bsnefii 3xcept the 
@ f  gift.  I  g~atiTj for  5 iiA W8283 Lean, but  dgniej Edggaijgnai beg&&, 
f  byas 
not awre that it vm~ld mean T~fleilure of my GI Bjff  and ths money that  1 
ccntributed i n t ~  the 3~i:nd. I s*%%s pr~rniserj $40,800 ?or ~olfege education, they 

- 72 pa>m&  sf $q  80,Gfj a aoia! $4 , ~ ~ 0 , ~ ~ ,  

ma$ is also i r ~ z  

 - j-z~C.'~-"- 

$ t i v ~  
,+.-ser- 

gnabi~ to 

~ t d t l s a U % Z .  
23, fPie e ~ d a  pfaen$s me fTsm Teeztergng 

r  . z i

r i - 2   l r l   2 

also includes reewty=: ~ ~ 2 2  

2 

t3e Air  Fcrce at itrfure date. 

&Tj abfley to serve yiss impajpd $y my yout3, imm&zrip$, iw aptitude 
and fgye] of 2&cafion /gqaired my abiiQt.  Fs&  record rjf NJPs:' Afiicfe 15 

,3  -- 
indicates only an isolated offenses, but has many minor infractions.  As you 
rebriet# my :ecoids.  YGG t;:ilt  se;  sGme immature decisi~n tfiai f  h%b mads, ists 
$--*- : s ~  
date. 

t'tg~sfR, e ~ f  sf ~nifgif;:j &$ss gods, fafied 

iwspections  ai~d missed test 

*--4-- 

t 

I 

nsver in  trol;-liz f ~ r  brl;7Wng, 5ghtii;g; cir being dlsrespect;2il to 

anyone.  Eeing sg y s ~ n g ,  !zck c.f  caf;3dence and IFW 33% ss$esm.  ! $%"as hina2is 
to qusstian sitiiations 23 they wre presented, 1 accepted ~"1412it f  3;&3  being 
jnstntl=:ted. 

My abitit)r to SBWS prsparty ye5 impaired because of  narSial and fz-miiy. 

f3y s~-%?z had a dgdg ai;d  &cohof ar&fgm. 
irtr;lttdiny  many drug & alr-oh~l rrgaimefit eenterg 2nd cousⅈg.  Once my 
Sgilgdron Cornman&;  gst hr,ichgd, 
at Ft BIgz, 7-X.  fis also sent ms is f h 9  sp:;iuse depen&nr;e  p r ~ g r s n ~  
spouse counseljng. 

her $0 3 aiigay drug & afcoh~! center 

f  tried eve;9;itfiing to 

h ~ r ,  

there, f ~ r  

I 

; 

$, 

-  - 
L==?+=- 

& - 3   f"  d A ~ X -
ij.b  Q 

f 

  I--  r-I  z.i?nG&egi 
,j=;-  ,.:% 
y:,  ;;iz $=,-:$ 

A!/ my lifs 1  have had tu striggie v-4th ieartlitlg.  Fdery rnandfirtoi-y test 

to provg that 1  cogid accomplish task, 2nd 

yd':ii3  entering the mi{j&ry :equired  ma to retake tgs lest i*2im fhe understandi:;g 
F I  failed 1  ~riauld be sent Rrrrne.  Euf,  t  did'n give trp  my dream of becoming a 
and self esteem to pus9 mys&f  gg2ra 
& -   = 
bs g$;e  up $befl  8 seemed 
f  f$ed  at &$,  1  y . 3 ~  disehargs 423 1s 

~ M P Q Z $ ~ ! ~ ,  
lack ~f kne+$edge, sMf/ lev$!, persoil& probiems, y~utftfi~i and immatur8 
~f my acegmg$shmgr;t t~ haye act my g+?& 2nd 
dscislgns,  f 
aji 
requirgd tast, to year my unif~rm bfught  me respect from  my r$iat&ss, teacfiers 
and @iends back frsme, 

- ~ + = ~ ~ ~  

-.=  .,-. -9- '

.==..+ nfif -- ilinz."isr~= 

f  ~ 2 ~ s i t  

i ~ 2 s  discharged T diine 15.90, fism Eieisan ,4FB, AK.  Ifi,bile out- 

prgcessina frcm  the base, to my new base P&-~r;fi ,AFB, GO. ! ~ 3 3  
from the Gmmander no more trouble, but Mile out processing I returned 
soiled.  tt kzis reported to my commander, 
beddiitg fuirmittrre,  the mgttress 
that tms the 3naf  irncident.  I  re~ef%~ei: a Gzneraf, Urrder i-lm.=ra-s$le Conb!tions. 
Under carrent standards, i %~u!d n d  have beer; discharged f@r this aflenses. 

on ?twmifig 

m&apjitj. 1 

Since discha~ge 

been a g ~ o d  &&en- 1  am now a 
divaiced siflglf;? parent n%h three chitdren Rsm that rnarfige, sste custody, since 
1935, 1  have +mfied szverai jobs. I attended A G S ~ B  Ccmputer Institute, 
rscord,  am 
&~i;h~rage AK campus.  Since feaving the misgaw, fls 
requesting a review in person in regzrds to upgrslde discharge from General, 
Und,gr #c.fiar&!e  cond$;e;ls to 2 # ~ n s ~ g b f e  Discharge. 

DEPARTMENT  OF  THE  AIR  FORCE 

34313 COMPONENT REPAIR SQUADRON (AAC) 
ElELSON AIR  FORCE BASE. ALASKA 99702-5000 

REPLY TO 
ATTN OF 

cc 

,,,,, 

N o t i f i c a t i o n   L e t t e r  

MAY  2 5 1990 

ro  A1  C 

343  CRS, 

(AAC) 

1.  I  am  recommending  your  discharge  from  t h e   United  S t a t e s  Air  Force  f o r  
Minor  D i s c i p l i n a r y   I n f r a c t i o n s .   The  a u t h o r i t y   f o r   t h i s  a c t i o n   i s  AFR  39-10, 
paragraph  5-46. 
c h a r a c t e r i z e d   a s  honorable  o r   general. 
c h a r a c t e r i z e d   a s  general. 

If  my  recommendation  is  approved,  your  s e r v i c e   w i l l  be 

I  am  recommending  t h a t   your  s e r v i c e   be 

2.  My  r e a s o n s   f o r   t h i s   a c t i o n   a r e   a s   follows: 

a .   On  o r   about  18  March  1988,  you  made  and  u t t e r e d   a  w o r t h l e s s   check  t o  
a  Morale,  Welfare,  and  Recreation  (MWR)  Division  a c t i v i t y   a t  Eielson  Air  Force 
Base,  Alaska. 

(Atch  1) 

b.  On  o r   about  20  November  1988,  you  f a i l e d   t o  provide  f i n a n c i a l   support 

f o r   your  dependent  daughter,  a s  evidenced  by  a  l e t t e r   from MS-q 
41QT (Atch  2) 

I 

c.  On  o r   about  26  April  1989,  you  f a i l e d   t o   r e p o r t   t o  your  appointed 

p l a c e   of  d u t y   a t  t h e   time  p r e s c r i b e d ,   a s  evidenced  by  a  Record  of  I n d i v i d u a l  
Counseling,  d a t e d   26  April  1990. 

(Atch  3 )  

d.  On  8  June  1989,  you  f a i l e d   t o  meet  AFR  35-10  d r e s s   and  appearance 

standards,  f o r   which  you  received  a  Record  o f   Individual  Counseling,  dated  8 
June  89. 

(Atch  4) 

e.  On  30  June  1989,  you  f a i l e d   t o  r e p o r t   t o   your  appointed  p l a c e   of  duty 
a t  t h e   time  p r e s c r i b e d ,   a s   evidenced  by  a  L e t t e r   o f   Reprimand,  dated  12  J u l y  
1989. 

(Atch  5 )  

f.  On  5  J u l y   1989,  you  f a i l e d   t o  r e p o r t   t o  your  appointed  p l a c e   of  duty 
a t  t h e   time  p r e s c r i b e d ,   a s  evidenced  by  a  L e t t e r   o f   Reprimand,  dated  18  July 
1989. 

(Atch  6 )  

g.  On  12  J u l y   1989,  you  went  from  your  appointed  p l a c e   of  duty  without 
a u t h o r i t y ,   a s   evidenced  by  a  Record  o f   I n d i v i d u a l   Counseling,  dated  12 J u l y  
1989. 

(Atch  7) 

h.  On  or  about  24  August  1989,  you  again  f a i l e d   t o  p r o v i d e   f i n a n c i a l  

support  f o r   your  dependent  daughter,  f o r   which  you  received  a  Record  of 
I n d i v i d u a l   Counseling,  dated  24  August  1989. 

(Atch  8 )  

i .   On  d i v e r s   o c c a s i o n s   from  on  o r   about  1 August  1989  t o  on  o r   about  15 

August  1989,  you  were  d e r e l i c t   i n   t h e   performance  of  your  d u t i e s ,   f o r   which 
you 
9 

received  a  Record  of  I n d i v i d u a l   Counseling,  dated  30  August  1989. 

(Atch 

Top  Cover  for  North  America 

j.  On  d i v e r s   o c c a s i o n s   from  on  or  about  16  August  1989  t o  on  o r   about  31 

August  1989,  you  were  d e r e l i c t   i n   t h e   performance  o f   your  d u t i e s ,   f o r   which 
you  received  a  Record  of  I n d i v i d u a l   Counseling,  dated  30  August  1989. 
(Atch 
10 

k.  On  o r   about  28  August  1989,  you  were  d e r e l i c t   i n   t h e   performance  of 
your  d u t i e s ,   f o r   which  you  received  a  L e t t e r   o f   Reprimand,  dated  31  August 
1989,  which  was  e n t e r e d   into  your  Unfavorable  Information  F i l e   (UIF). 
11) 

(Atch 

1.  On  o r   about  8  September  1989,  you  f a i l e d   t o  r e p o r t   t o   your  appointed 
p l a c e   of  d u t y   a t  t h e   time  p r e s c r i b e d ,   a s   evidenced  by  a  Record  o f   I n d i v i d u a l  
Counseling,  dated  11  September  1989. 

(Atch  12) 

m. 

From  on  o r   about  1  ~ e p t e m b e r  1989  t o  on  o r   about  3  October  1989,  you 

f a i l e d   t o  t u r n   i n   c e r t a i n   e x c e s s   government  f u r n i t u r e ,   which  had  been 
loaned  t o  you,  a s   evidenced  by  a  343  SVS/SVOS  letter,  dated  3  Oct  89. 
13) 

(Atch 

n.  On  o r   about  15 September  1989,  you  a g a i n   f a i l e d   t o  provide  f i n a n c i a l  

ndent  daughter,  a s  evidenced  by  a  l e t t e r   from  N s  
dated  15  September  1989. 

(Atch  14) 

o.  On  o r   about  12 October  1989,  you  f a i l e d   t o  r e p o r t   t o  your  appointed 

p l a c e   of  duty  a t  t h e   t i m e   p r e s c r i b e d ,   f o r   which  you  received  Article  15,  UCMJ, 
n o n j u d i c i a l   punishment  on  20  October  1989. 

(Atch  15) 

p.  On  30  November  1989,  you  were  found  t o  be  i n   v i o l a t i o n   of  AFR  35-10 

d r e s s   and  appearance  s t a n d a r d s ,   f o r   which  you  were  counselled,  a s  evidenced  by 
a  Memo  For  Record,  d a t e d   30  November  1989. 

(Atch  16) 

r

I

 

q. 

From  on  o r   a b o u t   1  February  1990  t o  on  o r   about  16  A p r i l   1990,  you 
were  indebted  t o  your  l a n d l o r d   f o r   t h r e e   months  r e n t ;   a s   of  16  A p r i l   1990, 
you  were  t h r e e   months  d e l i n q u e n t   i n   your  l e a s e   payments.  Based  on  your 
dishonorable  f a i l u r e   t o  pay  your  j u s t   d e b t s ,   you  were  administered  a  L e t t e r   of 
Reprimand,  dated  18  A p r i l   1990,  which  was  placed  i n  your  UIF. 

(Atch  17) 

r.  Between  on  o r   about  25  May  1989  and  on  o r   about  16  A p r i l   1990,  you 
n e g l i g e n t l y   damaged  government  p r o p e r t y ,   f o r   which  you  received  A r t i c l e   15, 
UCMJ,  n o n j u d i c i a l   punishment  on  24  A p r i l   1990. 

(Atch  18) 

Copies  of  t h e   documents  t o  be  forwarded  t o  t h e   s e p a r a t i o n   a u t h o r i t y   i n   support 
o f   t h i s   recommendation  a r e   a t t a c h e d .   The  commander  e x e r c i s i n g   SPCM 
j u r i s d i c t i o n   o r   a  h i g h e r   a u t h o r i t y   w i l l   d e c i d e   whether  you  w i l l   be  discharged 
o r   r e t a i n e d   i n   t h e   Air  Force  and,  i f   you  a r e   discharged,  how  your  s e r v i c e  w i l l  
be  c h a r a c t e r i z e d .  
r e e n l i s t m e n t   i n   t h e   A i r  Force. 

If  you  a r e   discharged,  you  w i l l  be  i n e l i g i b l e   f o r  

3.  You  have  t h e   r i g h t   t o  c o n s u l t   counsel.  M i l i t a r y   l e g a l   counsel  h a s   been 
o b t a i n e d   t o  a s s i s t   you. 
9~ 
capt- 
a t   /=o 

Area  Defense  Counsel,  b u i l d i n g   3112,  on  29 /&.t.,/ 

hours.  You  may  c o n s u l t   c i v i l i a n   counsel  a t  your  ownlexpense. 

I  have  made  an  appointment  f o r   you  t o   c o n s u l t  

1 

4.  You  have  t h e   r i g h t   t o   submit  rskatements  i n   your  own  b e h a l f .   Any 
s t a t e m e n t s  you  want  t h e   s e p a r a t i o n   a u t h o r i t y   t o  consider  must  reach  me  by 
, u n l e s s   you  r e q u e s t   and  r e c e i v e   an  e x t e n s i o n   f o r   good 

c a u s e   shown. 

I  w i l l   send  them  t o   t h e   s e p a r a t i o n   a u t h o r i t y .  

I f   you  f a i l  t o  c o n s u l t   counsel  o r   t o  submit  s t a t e m e n t s   i n   your  own  b e h a l f ,  

5. 
your  f a i l u r e   w i l l  c o n s t i t u t e   a  waiver  o f   your  r i g h t   t o   do  so. 

6.  You  have  been  scheduled  f o r   a  medical  examination.  You  must  r e p o r t   t o  t h e  
P h y s i c a l   Examinations  S e c t i o n ,   343d  Medical  Group,  b u i l d i n g   3349,  a t  0730 
hours  on  A9 

f o r   t h e   examination. 

80 

7.  Any  p e r s o n a l   information  you  f u r n i s h   i n   r e b u t t a l   is covered  by  t h e   Privacy 
Act  Statement,  a s   explained  i n   AFR  39-10,  attachment  6 .   A  copy  of  AFR  39-10 
is a v a i l a b l e   f o r   your  u s e   i n  t h e   343  CRS  O r d e r l y   Room. 

d  acknowledgment  and  r e t u r n   it  t o  me 

immediately. 

19  Atch 
1.  Dishonored  Check  N o t i f i c a t i o n ,  

20  Nov  88 

undated 
MS -~tr, 
AF  Form  174,  26  Apr  89 
AF  Form  174,  8  Jun  89 
L t r   o f   Beprimand,  12  J u l  89 
L t r   of  Reprimand,  18  J u l   89,  w/2 
a t c h  
AF  Form  174,  12  J u l  89 
AF  Form  174,  24  Aug  89 
AF  Form  174,  30  Aug  89 
AF  Form  174,  30  Aug  89 
L t r   of  Reprimand,  31  Aug  89,  w/l 
a t c h  
AF  Form  174,  1 1  Sep  89 
343  SVS/SVOS  L t r ,   3  O c t   89 
Hs Wright's  L t r ,   15 Sep  89 
AF  Form  3070,  20  O c t   89,  w/2 
a t c h  
Memo  f o r   Record,  30  Nov  89 
L t r   o f   Reprimand,  18 Apr  90,  w/4 
a t c h  
AF  Form  3070,  24  Apr  90,  w/3 
a t c h  
Airman's  Receipt  o f   N o t i f i c a t i o n  
L t r