NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09820-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval sitting in executive session, considered your Records, Your allegations of error and application on 14 August 2008. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. After careful and constientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09821-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 October 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09825-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that these factors and contention were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your disciplinary record...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09828-07
You requested, in effect, that the fitness reports for 15 April to 31 December 2005 and 1 January to 9 June 2006 be modified, in accordance with the reporting senior’s (RS’s) undated letter, by changing the marks in sections F.] (“Leading Subordinates”), F.2 (“Developing Subordinates”) and F.4 (“Ensuring Well-being of Subordinates”) from “H” (not observed) to “p” (fourth best of seven possible marks) in the case of the report for 15 April to 31 December 2005, and “EF” (third best) in the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09831-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Records, sitting in executive session, application on 25 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Boar your application, together with all material submit thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes and policies. In addition, the Board considered th the Navy Discharge Review Board (NDRB) dated 3 Octo copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09832-07
The portion of the MGIB agreement as it applies to your application states that you had to serve on active duty for a period of 36 months in order to be eligible and the benefit had to be used within 10 years. Since you do not meet the time in service requirement and your separation was clearly voluntary, the Board concluded that you are not entitled to MGIB benefits and a correction to your record is not warranted. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09851-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09855-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 April 2008. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09859-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TRG Docket No: 6859-07 28 August 2008 States Code section 1552, A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2008. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09863-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “C” Selective Reenlistment Bonus(SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Pfeiffer, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 11 February 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09865-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. requested to enroll her spouse in the SBP on 7 August 2006.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09866-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to waive recoupment of the unearned portion of his Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB); and to backdate advancement to paygrade E-5. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09867-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2008. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09872-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 24 June 1982, you were counseled and warned that further misconduct could result in administrative discharge action.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09877-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 August 2008. In this regard, an RE-4 reenlistment code is required when an individual is separated due to an “early out” request and is not recommended for retention. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09881-07
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed removing, rather than modifying, the contested report for 2 June to 26 October 2006. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 February 2008. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09884-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-8100 BIG Docket No: 9884-07 22 February 2008 naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09891-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 August 2008. Your receipt of substantial disability ratings from the VA is not probative of the existence of error or injustice in your naval record, because the VA awarded those ratings without regard to the issue of your fitness for military duty on the date of your discharge from the Navy. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09893-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a member of the Marine Corps, applied to this Board requesting removal of the nonjudicial punishment (NJP) that he had on 8 November 2006, and the adverse fitness report that resulted from the NUP. g. Attached to enclosure (1) is an advisory opinion from Headquarters Marine Corps, Military Law Branch of the Judge Advocate Division, regarding the removal of Petitioner's NIP that was administered on 8 November 2006, which states, in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09908-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 August 2008. It appears that you were not permitted to reenlist at that time because you were unable to pass the Marine Corps physical fitness test (PFT) because of your shoulder condition. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09916-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in execlitive session, considered your application on 25 November 2008. Additionally, you were counseled and warned that further misconduct could result in administrative discharge) action. a records.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09917-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 July 2008. It concluded that your service was properly characterized as under honorable conditions in view of your extensive disciplinary record, and that you have not demonstrated that it would be in the interest of justice for the Board to upgrade your discharge to fully honorable. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09917-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 7 September 1967. It concluded that your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09918-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09919-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Records, sitting in executive session, application on 25 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Boar your application, together with all material submit thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes and policies. On 30 May 1990 discharge authority directed an other than honorabl reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious 31 May 1990 you were so discharged.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09931-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by modifying the fitness report for 22 June to 30 September 2006, in accordance with the reporting senior’s letter of 22 February 2007 (copy in enclosure (1)), by raising the marks in sections E.1 (“Courage”) and F.2 (“Effectiveness under Stress”) from “*H” (not observed) to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09942-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 August 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09947-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09953-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Additionally, you were counseled and warned that £UFENSE misconduct could result in administrative discharge action. On 26 September 1983, the discharge authority directed an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09956-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 August 2008. Based on the information currently contained in your record it appears you remained on active duty until you were discharged under honorable condition for convenience of the government due to a personality disorder, and assigned an RE-3G reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09961-07
09961-07 31 January 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: an , REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the date of rank on his commission as a lieutenant, Chaplain Corps, U. S. Navy, as 1 May 2005, vice 1 May 2007; and that his lineal...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09971-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 August 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09989-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 September 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09992-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX CRS WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 Docket No: 9992-07 20 November 2008 This is in reference to your application for correction of your late father’s naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2008. After careful consideration of your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09997-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo dtd 22 Jan 08, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09999-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 811/034 of 11 January 2008, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10001-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show timely election of the REDUX Retired Pay Plan with a lump sum payment of the Career Status Bonus (CSB)2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 February 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10005-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Headquarters, Marine Corps, Performance Evaluation Review Branch dated 6 November 2007. a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10009-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 February 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10013-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 10013-07 26 June 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: secretary of the Navy Subj: FORMERS we gene REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Applicable directives authorize the assignment of either an RE-3E or RE-4 reentry code to an individual separated for erroneous enlistment. Accordingly, the Board recommends that Petitioner’s reason...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10014-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 17 October 2002, a service record entry was made which stated that a psychiatric evaluation conducted on 28 August 2002, diagnosed you with dysthymia and having an avoidant personality disorder, both of which existed prior to enlistment, and concluded by recommending an expeditious...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10020-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner is entitled to payment of Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) for the prior duty station2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 March 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10022-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the acceptance date and date of rank of his commission in the grade of ensign as 1 October 2006, vice 1 March 2007. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10024-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, applied to this Board requesting that his discharge be upgraded. His last act of misconduct which resulted in his receiving an undesirable discharge (UD) occurred on 14 september 1954 when he was convicted by civil authorities of being a “peeping tom.” CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board concludes that as a matter clemency Petitioner’s request for an upgrade of his UD should be granted. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10025-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Finally, regarding your contentions, personal or financial problems do not excuse misconduct and regulations authorize discharge of members who are convicted in civil court. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10026-07
10026-07 27 May 08This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 May 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Since he did...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10027-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 HD:hd Docket No. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 June 2008. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10030-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 2 March 1988, you enlisted in the Navy at age 18. On 22 November 1995, you were honorably...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10035-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYBOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRSDocket No: 10035-07 5 June 2008This is in reference to your application for reconsideration for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United States Code section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 June 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10036-07
10036-07 29 July 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF@€ Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting that his discharge be upgraded to honorable. The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings should be filed in Petitioner’s naval record so that all future reviewers will understand the reasons for the...