Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09866-07
Original file (09866-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

MEH

Docket No. 9866-07
24 Nov 08

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO /

   

Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) CNO memo 1160 Ser N130D3/U0758 of 14 Oct 08
(3) Subject’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter
referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board
requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected
to waive recoupment of the unearned portion of his Selective
Reenlistment Bonus (SRB); and to backdate advancement to paygrade E-5.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman,
reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24
November 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s
application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and
warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds
the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective

action.
Docket No. 9866-07
RECOMMENDATION :

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to
show that:

a. He is entitled to SRB payments received from 22 July 2003
(date of reenlistment) to 22 June 2007 (date of discharge). Any
monies that may have already been recouped should be returned.

b. Petitioner’s request to have his advancement to paygrade E-5
backdated to 22 July 2003 was denied due to lack of evidence to
substantiate entitlement to the advarcement.

c. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.
4, It is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and
deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true complete record of the
Board's proceedings in the above entitled matter.

‘ we
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN | WILLIAM J. HESS, I
Recorder |; Acting Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it ig hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board gn behalf of the Secretary of the

Navy.

 

24 November 2008 4 \
W. DEAN PFEIBRE
Executive Diredc¢t

N

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09866-08

    Original file (09866-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to waive recoupment of the unearned portion of his Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB); and to backdate advancement to paygrade E-5. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03970-08

    Original file (03970-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS '2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. 03970-08 1 August 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09866-10

    Original file (09866-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) . The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08181-07

    Original file (08181-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible.2. The Board, consisting of Exinicios, George, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 14 January 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10375-07

    Original file (10375-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 16 June 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00375-03

    Original file (00375-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 August 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03272-07

    Original file (03272-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show a waiver of the recoupment of the unearned portion of his Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Ruskin, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 December 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08083-07

    Original file (08083-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to cancel a debt incurred by an erroneous payment. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 6...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06554-07

    Original file (06554-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    That board considered Petitioner for promotion, but did not select him.d. Based on the findings and action of the PERB, the Board concludes that the marginal fitness reports should not have been part of Petitioner’s naval record when he was considered for promotion in 2006.Whether Petitioner would have been selected for promotion in 2006 or not (without the marginal fitness reports) cannot be known and is largely a matter of conjecture. Moreover, when asked to provide substantive comments...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09626-07

    Original file (09626-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted in paygrade E-2, vice F-i.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, George, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 January 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. He was further...