Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09908-07
Original file (09908-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX

: oO
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 JRE

Docket No. 09908-07
22 August 2008

 

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 21 August 2008. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. In addition, it considered the

comments of your counsel.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material

error or injustice.

The Board found that you were the subject of a medical board
which convened on 25 March 1993, to report evaluate the
residuals of a shoulder injury you had sustained approximately
seven years earlier. The medical board report indicates that
the residuals of the injury prevented you from doing any pull-
ups. The medical board report was referred to the Physical
Evaluation Board (PEB), which considered your case on 1 June
1993. The PEB determined that you were fit for duty. You
disagreed, and requested that you be accorded a personal
appearance hearing. On 12 July 1993, your request for a hearing
was denied. You were discharged from the Marine Corps on 12
December 1993, at the expiration of your enlistment. It appears
that you were not permitted to reenlist at that time because you
were unable to pass the Marine Corps physical fitness test (PFT)
because of your shoulder condition. Following your discharge,
the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) awarded you disability
ratings of 20% for the shoulder condition, and 10% for

hypertension.

The Board found that your receipt of disability ratings from the
VA is not probative of the existence of error or injustice in
your military record, because the VA assigned those ratings
without regard to the issue of your fitness for military duty at
the time of your separation from the Marine Corps. It appears
that you were capable of performing your duties as an air
traffic controller in an outstanding manner, and would have
continued to do so had you been permitted to reenlist. The
Board concluded that your inability to pass the PFT and
resulting denial of reenlistment did not provide a basis for
finding you unfit for duty and granting your request for
disability retirement. Accordingly, your application has been
denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be

furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

   
 

 

We “DEAN DEE LE A
Bxecutive D eek

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00170

    Original file (PD2009-00170.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence this condition was unfitting at the time of separation from service. There is no evidence these conditions were unfitting at the time of separation from service. The Board also considered the following conditions and unanimously determined that none were unfitting at the time of separation from service and therefore no disability rating is applied: Residuals, Postoperative Cervical Discectomy and Fusion at C5-C6 and C6-C7, Cervical Disc Disease with Radiculopathy;...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00480

    Original file (PD2009-00480.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was on two periods of limited duty for his right shoulder and he was then referred to the Navy Physical Evaluation Board (PEB). Other conditions rated by the VA (left knee, right knee and Anxiety Disorder) as well as heart condition and right wrist not rated by the VA appear to be what the CI is contending for in addition to re-rating his right shoulder. Service Treatment Record.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05305-10

    Original file (05305-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 March 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00530

    Original file (PD2009-00530.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Neuropsychological testing was done from October 11-13, 2005, nine months prior to separation, to evaluate subjective complaints of impaired memory. The CI also noted irritability. The Board determined therefore that none of the stated conditions were subject to service disability rating.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05954-03

    Original file (05954-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Osgood- In this regard, The Board noted that your receipt of a disability benefits from the VA does not demonstrate that your discharge from the Marine Corps was erroneous. As you have not demonstrated that any of the conditions rated by the VA, either separately or in combination with others, rendered you unfit for duty at the time of your discharge from the Marine Corps, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00154

    Original file (PD2009-00154.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Unfitting ConditionsCodeRatingDateConditionCodeRatingExamEffectiveResiduals of a Left Elbow Injury500310%Residual, Left Elbow Comminuted Avulsion Fracture of the Olecranon with Degenerative Arthritis (Claimed as Left Elbow and Left Arm Conditions)5003-520550%2007040320070124Left elbow degenerative joint disease (PEB)FIT---Ulnar Nerve Neuropathy With Chronic Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy, Left Elbow (Claimed as Left Hand Condition, 4th and 5th Digits) Associated with Residual, Left Elbow...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04463-02

    Original file (04463-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 October 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00717

    Original file (PD2010-00717.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Other PEB Conditions . The Board notes that the CI had stopped use of CPAP by the time of the VA C&P exam, three months after separation. The Board determined therefore that none of the stated conditions were subject to Service disability rating.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01348-02

    Original file (01348-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    observed" fitness report for the period 20 December 1991 to 29 February 1992 states that Petitioner had been released from active duty following failure of selection to MAJ. physical examination on 10 March 1992 stated that Petitioner was physically qualifieefor separation, and the PEB had approved A report of A "not 6 In the report of medical history completed by that his discharge due to vascular headaches and left shoulder instability. investigation, and since more than adequate time to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07646-10

    Original file (07646-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board may deny an application in executive session if it determines that the evidence of record fails to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. If the petitioner’s fitness is considered questionable by the Board or the author(s) of the medical advisory opinion, the Board or its staff will in most cases seek an advisory opinion from the Director, SECNAVCORB, on the issue of the petitioner’s fitness for duty at the time of his separation or release from active...