NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09600-07
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 27 November 2007, a copy of which is attached. The fitness report is a Periodic/Regular report. Should the member desire he may prepare a statement to the record and submit it in accordance with reference (a) and it will be accepted to the member’s official file.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09601-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you were released from active duty on 23 April 1997 and transferred to the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09602-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, your case was forwarded, and on 20 July 1967 the discharge authority approved the recommendation for an undesirable discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09610-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09614-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2008. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09616-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, reconsidered your case on 19 June 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your letter, together with all material submitted in support thereof, the Board's file on your prior case, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09620-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The first issue was t DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND 5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000 1000 PERS-312D1/06 6 JUN 2008 Navy Personnel Command Board for Correction of Naval Records ion of Naval Records -O7 ressed two issues that he official military personnel D show...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09622-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded this factor wags not sufficient to warrant a change in the reenlistment code due to your failure to meet the Navy’s PFA requirements. In this regard, an RE-4 reenlistment code is authorized when an individual fails his fourth PFA in a four year period.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09623-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 June 2008. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09624-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to payment of full separation pay when he was discharged on 18 August 2007.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 March 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09625-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 July 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Sincerely, W. DEAN Bi Executive Dil or Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 2 NAVY ANNEX IN REPLY REFER...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09626-07
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted in paygrade E-2, vice F-i.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, George, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 January 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. He was further...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09629-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2008. -In this regard, an RE-4 reenlistment code is required when an individual is separated at the expiration of his term of active obligated service and is not recommended for retention. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09634-07
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive DirectorEnclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND5720 INTEGRITY DRIVEMILLINGTON TN 38055-0000 5730Pers-91207 Dec 07MEMORANDUM FOREXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDSVia: Assistant for BCNR Matters (Pers—31C)Subj: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09635-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 July 2008. Although it is not stated in the record, it appears that you elected to waive the right to have your case considered by an administrative discharge board. Please be advised that NUJP evidence is routinely destroyed after several years, and the only evidence is the entry in your service record showing that you received NJP for wearing an earring...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09639-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 12 September 2003 to 8 June 2004, a copy of which is at Tab A; removing her failures of selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 06, 07 and 08 Line Captain Selection Boards; and granting her a special selection board for the FY 06 Line Captain...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09639-07
In enclosure (6), the NPC office responsible for officer promotions has commented to the effect that since the fitness report in question is valid, Petitioner’s request for a special selection board has no merit. The documentation Petitioner provided at enclosure (3), especially the statistics, convinces the majority that Petitioner might well have deserved to be ranked above, rather than below, her peer in the contested fitness report. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09641-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Your request was approved by the discharge authority, and you received an undesirable discharge on 21 August 1970. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09644-07
09644-07 11 August 2008 Document of your application, ceedings of this ary material cons; i that you did not submit any new material evidence Accordingly, the Board affirmed its previous findings which are contained in 1997 would not have been entitled to disability separation or retirement even if you had been unfit for duty, as your discharge under other than honorable conditions would have taken precedence over and precluded disability evaluation processing. In view of the foregoing,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09677-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09682-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09683-07
.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2008. Characterization of service is based in part on conduct and proficiency averages computed from marks assigned on a periodic basis. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09688-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Applicable regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to Sailors who are separated due to a diagnosed personality disorder.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09690-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when japplying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden }|is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09697-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09699-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your late father's naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when japplying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden jis on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09703-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board noted that applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are separated due to erroneous enlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09705-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, ions and policies. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was ansufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden ig on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09710-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2008. Applicable regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are separated due to erroneous enlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09713-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 October 2008. The Board noted that even if you had been discharged due to your commission of consensual homosexual acts, the application of current standards would not result in a more favorable discharge given the numerous aggravating factors present in your case, to include committing homosexual acts in public view and while aboard a naval vessel. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09722-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09724-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 27 April 1982 at age 19. Pursuant to the unanimous recommendation of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09727-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09728-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2008. On 1 May 1992, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09743-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09752-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the orders reassigning Petitioner from Willow Grove, PA to NAS JRB Ft Worth, TX were issued prior to 18 July 2007.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, George, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 3 December 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09753-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You were counseled and warned that further misconduct could result in administrative discharge action. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09757-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 May 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09759-07
In addition, the member must affiliate with a Navy Reserve unit within twelve months from their release from active duty date and must submit an advancement determination request within six months of affiliation, (enclosure (2)).d. They reason that the BUPERS Instruction clearly states that service members, who transfer to the Naval Reserves from active duty within one year of separating from active duty, are required to submit documentation through their reserve unit to NPC within six...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09760-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a retired Navy Reservist, filed an application with this Board Ms. g and Ms. Tegations of error and should be taken on the available evidence of record. Given the recommendation contained in the advisory opinion, the Board concludes that Petitioner should be credited with nonpay retirement points for the period 30 October to 2 November 2003. The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings should be filed in Petitioner's...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09763-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of lieutenant he would have been assigned had he been promoted to that grade from the Fiscal Year (FY) O07 Active Duty Lieutenant All Fully Qualified Officer List (AFQOL), vice the FY 08 AFQOL (he missed consideration for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09766-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish authorization to restore 67 days of leave.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Pfeiffer, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 9 Jun 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09767-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for College Credit(EBCC).2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 March 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09769-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Also, it appears that after being advised of your procedural rights, you waived the right to an administrative discharge board (ADB).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09779-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show USNR enlistment guarantees, vice USN.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, George, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 January 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09782-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes regulations and policies. You are entitle Board reconsider its decision upon submission of n evidence or other matter not previously considered In this regard, it is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09790-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a retired Navy Reservist, filed an application with this Board Ms. g and Ms. Tegations of error and should be taken on the available evidence of record. Given the recommendation contained in the advisory opinion, the Board concludes that Petitioner should be credited with nonpay retirement points for the period 30 October to 2 November 2003. The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings should be filed in Petitioner's...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09791-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 September 2008. In addition, the VA may amend ratings at any time it determines there has been a significant improvement or worsening of a rated condition, and it may add ratings for new conditions that are considered secondary to a rated condition, as in your case, where you received ratings for bilateral hip conditions more than eight years after you were...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09806-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09817-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2008. In addition, the Board considered the decision of the Navy Discharge Review Board (NDRB) dated 26 October 2005, a copy of which is attached. Sincerely, W. DEAN Kxecutive D Bnew lLosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY SECRETARY OF THE NAVY COUNCIL OF REVIEW BOARDS 720 KENNON ST SE RM 309 (NDRB) WASHINGTON NYD DC 20374-5023 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY October 26,...