DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX CRS
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 Docket No: 9992-07
20 November 2008
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
late father’s naval record pursuant to the provisions of title
10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 19 November 2008. After careful consideration of
your application, the Board concluded that your application was
not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of
justice to excuse your failure to submit your application ina
timely manner. Although you may have discovered the alleged
error or injustice in your father’s record in 2006, your father
knew in 1945 that he had been discharged because of repeated
disciplinary infractions, rather than due to a war neurosis.
You may request reconsideration of this decision. Your request
must include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not
reasonably available to you when you submitted your application.
The evidence may pertain to the timeliness of your application
or to its merits. Absent such additional evidence, further
review of your application is not possible.
It is regretted that a more favorable reply cannot be made.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN DFETEYE
Executive Dixnect
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10186-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. There is a letter in file from your father asking whether the transfer to the Retired Reserve would have any impact on his retired pay at age 60. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09699-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your late father's naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when japplying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden jis on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02730-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 December 2008. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5757 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 May 2015. To my surprise I discovered the discharge document.” as the basis for waiving the statute of limitations. The Board determined that the reason you provided was insufficient to waive the statute of limitations and there is no evidence provided that indicates you were unable to file your application within the three years from when you learned of your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08098-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your late father’s naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 18 March 1946 he was convicted by civil authorities of robbery and sentenced to an unspecified period of confinement. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02986-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your late father's naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06052-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 November 2009. Therefore, on 24 August 2009, you were separated with an honorable discharge and an RE-4 reenlistment code due to a personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02095-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your late father’s naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.Your father reenlisted in the Navy on 26 January 1965 after nearly 10 years of prior...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08477-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JRE Docket No. In this regard, the Board found that you were aware of the alleged errors and or injustices in your record in 1991, when you were discharged under other than honorable , conditions without entitlement to disability benefits administered by the Department of the Navy. Your request must include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not reasonably available to you when you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3916 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application ina timely manner. Specifically, you provided a statement that “you loved your time on active duty in the Marine Corps” that...