NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10036-07
10036-07 29 July 2008From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting that his discharge be upgraded to honorable.2. Nevertheless his disciplinary record of two NJPs even though for minor offenses does not warrant an honorable discharge.The Board further concludes that this Report of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10038-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10040-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 June 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10052-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to Board Certified Pay (BCP)2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 11 February 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10056-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 30 August 1979, you enlisted in the Marine Corps at age 18. On 15 December 1981, you requested an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10057-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (@), Petitioner, «4 commissioned officer in the Marine Corps Reserve tiied an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he was discharged from the Regular Marine Corps on 1 July 2007 without accepting a reserve commission. The Board, consisting of Mr. eee Mr. and is on 15 reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error an injustice January 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10064-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SMW Docket No: 10064-07 26 June 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF(gne Ref: (a) 10 U.S.c. On 9 July 1992, the separation authority approved the discharge recommendation and directed an OTH discharge by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense. g. Regulations authorize an OTH discharge to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10070-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 25 March 1979, you enlisted in the Marine Corps at age 18. In connection with this processing, you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10071-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Petitioner contacted Retired Operations Section (N-152), enclosure (2), requesting clarification on retired status. Per enclosure (4) advancement on the retired list to the grade of CWO2 would result in a loss of pay.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10082-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 HD:hd Docket No. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 June 2008. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10084-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 June 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable Statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10100-07
After careful and conscientious consideration of th record, the Board found that the evidence submitted insufficient to establish the existence of probable error or injustice. The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Co November 1969. In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth service.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10105-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 October 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10106-07
10106-07 2 June 2008DearThis is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 May 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10107-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 26 May 1984, you were counseled regarding the Marine Corps policy on use of illegal drugs and warned that further infractions could result in disciplinary action or an other than honorable (OTH) discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10109-07
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, Lippolis and Lucas, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 7 February 2008, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That his record be corrected further by removing the page li(c) counseling entry dated 12 September 2005. c. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10115-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 July 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, togéther with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10116-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 June 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10122-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. During the period 12 November 1982 to 18 February 1983, you had three NUP's. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10123-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded that these factors and contention were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge due to the seriousness of your misconduct that continued after you were repeatedly warned that further infractions could result in an OTH discharge. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10129-07
Subsequently you requested that you be issued an undesirable discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial for two periods of unauthorized absence totaling 124 days. The Board also took into account the lengthy period of your unauthorized absence as well as your prior disciplinary record consisting of seven instances of absence from your appointed place of duty.Accordingly, your application has been denied. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10130-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 June 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10131-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 August 2008. After careful and conschentious consideration of the entire record, the Board found] that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establith the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10132-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 1 April 1991, your commanding officer initiated administrative separation by reason of misconduct due to arug abuse. In connection with this processing, you acknowledged that separation could result in an OTH discharge and waived the right to have your case heard by an administrative...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10133-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 June 2008. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10135-07
The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 9 June 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10144-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 25 August 1960, you enlisted in the Navy at age 17 with parental consent. On 20 November 1962, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10147-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 July 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10148-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 July 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10149-07
rientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. VY ile OLliit Pain, m successfully completing the physical condition was disabling, or that you were unfit for duty by reason of physical disability at the time of your discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10150-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 June 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 5 October 1973, you requested an undesirable discharge (UD) for the good of the service to avoid trial by court-martial for the 134 day period of UA.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10154-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10155-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show, in effect, that his name was not removed from the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL). Qa d diiliee 2nd Mr. ee, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 25 January 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10162-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 October 2008. Your request was approved by the discharge authority, and you received an undesirable discharge on 13 September 1974. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10168-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. [In addition, the Board considered the advisory Opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 17 June 2008, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10172-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 July 2008. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. In connection with this processing, you acknowledged that separation could result in an OTH discharge and waived the right to have your case heard by an administrative discharge board (ADB). ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10174-07
You requested, in effect, that you be promoted to gunnery sergeant, pursuant to your selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2006 Gunnery Sergeant Selection Board. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 Feburary 2008. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10181-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/093 dtd 23 Jan 08, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10186-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. There is a letter in file from your father asking whether the transfer to the Retired Reserve would have any impact on his retired pay at age 60. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10188-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10194-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 811/ of 11 January 2008, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10200-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 August 2008. In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that you were unfit to reasonably perform the duties of your office, grade, rank or rating by reason of physical disability at the time of your release from active duty, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10209-07
10209-07 25 January 2008This is in reference to your applicationfor correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 January 2008. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC), dated 30 November 2007, and the e-mail from the HQMC Performance...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10210-07
On 11 September 2008, a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered only so much of your application as pertains to your request for disability separation. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10212-07
It is presumed you desire removing that failure of selection as well.Concerning the report for 1 August to 1 November 1999, you requested removing from section K.4 (reviewing officer’s (RO’s) comments) the sentences “He has valuable experience from prior MOS~ [military occupational specialty] billets that he needs to apply towards his current MOS.” and “His ground duties managerial/leadership aggressiveness needs to improve.” it is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CNC) has...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10215-07
The Board also considered your letter dated 25 March 2008.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Since the Board found insufficient basis toremove your failures of selection by the Fiscal Year 06, 07 and 08 Line Captain Selection Boards, it had no grounds to change your promotion status from above-zone to in-zone. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10216-07
On 2 December 1991, you were counseled regarding deficiencies in your performance and conduct and warned that further infractions could result in disciplinary action or an other than honorable (OTH) discharge. In connection with this processing, you acknowledged that separation could result in an OTH discharge and waived the right to have your case heard by an administrative discharge board (ADB). On 7 August 1992, you were so discharged.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 102261-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 23 July 1986 at age 18. On 28 March 1989 you received your second NJP...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10227-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10234-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show timely election of the REDUX Retired Pay Plan with a lump sum payment of the Career Status Bonus (CSB).2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 February 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...