Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09832-07
Original file (09832-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
e TRG

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 Docket No: 9832-07
20 November 2008

 

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 13 November 2008. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

You enlisted in the Navy on 21 July 1997 at age 18. At that
time, you elected to participate in the Montgomery G. I. Bill
(MGIB). The portion of the MGIB agreement as it applies to your
application states that you had to serve on active duty for a
period of 36 months in order to be eligible and the benefit had
to be used within 10 years. A copy of your agreement is
enclosed.

On 28 September 1998 you reported for duty under instruction at
the Nuclear Power Training Unit. On 29 April 1999 you were
married and apparently immediately requested release from active
duty. You were honorably released from active duty on 14 May
1999 with a narrative reason of separation due to pregnancy or
childbirth. The separation code entered on your DD Form 214
indicates that your separation from the Navy was voluntary. At
that time, you had completed 1 year, 9 months and 24 days of
active service. Subsequently, you were honorably discharged at
the end of your military obligation.

In some cases an individual may be eligible for benefits based on
the actual time served (in your case 21 months) if the separation
or discharge was considered to be involuntary. Your record shows
indicates that you wanted separation even prior to the birth of
voluntary.

Since you do not meet the time in service requirement and your
separation was clearly voluntary, the Board concluded that you

are not entitled to MGIB benefits and a correction to your record
is not warranted.

Accordingly, your application has been denied.. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 11034-07

    Original file (11034-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    + A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Records, sitting in executive session, considered application on 13 November 2008. tion of your of the United Naval our Your allegations |jof error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceédings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06026-02

    Original file (06026-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Subsequently, you were processed for separation by reason of convenience of the government due to \\pregnancy or childbirth." Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03562-99

    Original file (03562-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 1999. Eligibility for Federally Legislated Educational Benefit e Programs is determined by the member's initial entry onto active duty. enroll VEAP benefits.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07663-07

    Original file (07663-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TRG Docket No: 7663-07 28 August 2008 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010444C070208

    Original file (20040010444C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that she should have been extended from her original MSO (military service obligation) date of 28 February 1999 and not the enlistment/reenlistment contract she executed on 22 October 1999 which she executed when she went from the Army National Guard to the Army Reserve. On 22 October 1999 the applicant executed an enlistment/reenlistment contract in the United States Army Reserve. Table 3-1, rule A, of Army Regulation 140-111 authorizes extensions for a period of up...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9900004

    Original file (9900004.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his appeal, applicant submits a copy of AETC Form 1431, “Medical Service Grade and Pay Computation Worksheet,” a copy of a letter, dated 21 August 1997, from the U. S. Air Force Vice Chief of Staff stating that there is no relief available from USC Title 37 and that the applicant has support for an early release from the U. S. Air Force Reserve. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Physician Utilization Branch,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07316-98

    Original file (07316-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 March 1999. The Veterans Educational Assistance Program (VEAP) was a voluntary contributory program in which Navy matched each dollar contributed by the member with two dollars. Reference (c) provided the opportunity for VEAP participants to enroll in the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) Program provided they were on active duty and had contributions in a VEAP account...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08842-98

    Original file (08842-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1780 SER of which is attached. Reference (c) provided the opportunity for VEAP participants to enroll in the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) Program provided they were on active duty and had contributions in a VEAP Unfortunately, account on 9 October 1996...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00746-01

    Original file (00746-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F N A V A L R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 TRG Docket No: 746-01 2 March 2001 From: To : Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy " OF NAVAL RECORD 0 Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Naval Reserve filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his separation...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 02990-04

    Original file (02990-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After your discharge, you were rated as 10% disabled by the Department of Veterans Affairs.In your application you are requesting that the SPD code be changed to “JDG”, which will indicate that you were discharged by reason of parenthood or custody of minor children and your discharge was involuntary. Further, there is no evidence that a discharge by reason of physical disability was warranted. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...