DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
SIN
Docket] No: 09831-07
25 November 2008
This is in reference to your application for correc
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10
States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of
Records, sitting in executive session,
application on 25 November 2008. Your allegations
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administ
regulations and procedures applicable to the procee
Board. Documentary material considered by the Boar
your application, together with all material submit
thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes
and policies. In addition, the Board considered th
the Navy Discharge Review Board (NDRB) dated 3 Octo
copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of th
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was
establish the existence of probable material error
In this regard, the Board substantially concurred w
findings and conclusions of the NDRB. Accordingly,
application has been denied. The names and votes o
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of ne
evidence or other matter not previously considered
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind tha
presumption of regularity attaches to all official
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstra
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
‘Yon
W. DEAN
Executive
Enclosure
considered y
tion of your
of the United
Naval
our
of error and
rative
dings of this
d consisted of
ted in support
, regulations,
e decision of
ber 1977, a
e entire
insufficient to
or injustice.
ith the
your
f the members
are such that
to have the
w and material
by the Board.
coa
records.
official naval
te the
Or
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10421-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a | presumption of regularity attaches to all official records Consequently, when applying...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09362-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02085-08
Documentary material considered by the Boar of your application, support thereof, your naval record and applicable s regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of th record, the Board found that the evidence submitted insufficient to establish the existence of probable error or injustice. On 26 January 1991, the Department of Affairs denied your request for service connection of an alleged mortar wound of the right leg/foot be together with all material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09919-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Records, sitting in executive session, application on 25 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Boar your application, together with all material submit thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes and policies. On 30 May 1990 discharge authority directed an other than honorabl reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious 31 May 1990 you were so discharged.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11612-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 April 2009. Documentary evidence considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00223-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 September 2011. However, the Board found these factors were insufficient to warrant changing your reentry code due to your two NUP’s, and being an alcohol rehabilitation failure. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09677-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09212-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02482-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your e.rror and application on 6 June 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance ldith administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this considereld by the Board consisted of Board. The Board noted that an RE-4 reenlistment code is required by regulatory guidance and must The Board thus separated by reason of fraudulent enlistment. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09722-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...