NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05308-03
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner made a timely election of the REDUX Retired Pay System and is entitled to a lump sum payment of the Career Status Bonus (CSB) in the amount of $30,000.00. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Frankfurt, Kim, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner ’s allegations of error and injustice on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05325-03
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of major he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2003 Major Selection Board, vice the FY 2004 Major Selection Board. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Adams,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05336-03
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, tiled enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner made a timely election of the REDUX Retired Pay System and is entitled to a lump sum payment of the Career Status Bonus (CSB) in the amount of $30,000.00. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Harrison, Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 August 2003 and, pursuant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05353-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 September 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05373-03
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 August 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05384-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 August 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Rather than refer these charges to trial by court-martial your command informed you that it intended to recommend that you be administratively separated with a general discharge (under honorable conditions) by reason of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05388-03
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show she accepted her commission as a lieutenant, in the Nurse Corps of the Naval Reserve on 4 November 1989, vice 9 November 1989. CDR- USNR-R, Ref: (a) Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 14703 (b) E n d : (1) BCNR memo 5420 Pers-OOZCB of 10 Sep 03 1) is returned with the recommendation...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05403-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05431-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05437-03
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH:ecb Docket No: 5437-03 28 October 2003 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05447-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2003. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05456-03
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he elected to participate in the MGIB Program when first eligible.. 2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunne, Pfeiffer, and Frankfurt, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 15 October 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05492-03
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitlement to Medical Additional Special Pay (MASP) when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Neuschafer, Harrison, and McPartlin, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 26 August 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05493-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is existence of probable on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05507-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 September 2003. The Board noted that there are many individuals in the reserve component that have missed qualifying years by a few points who have had to serve additionai years in order to qualify for Since you can remain a member of the Marine Corps retirement. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05512-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 October 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material 'error or injustice. In accordance with BUPERS message 2011002 JUL 01 (message in effect at the time entering the Nuclear Field program and shipping to active duty between December 2001 and May...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05557-03
A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05561-03
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness reports for 1 February to 19 May 1989, and 1 July 1989 to 16 January 1990, copies of which are in enclosure (1) at Tabs A and B, respectively. Having reviewed a l l the f a c t s of record, the Board has dl.rcsctcd that your naval record will be corrected by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05572-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 26 June 2003, a copy of which is attached. The Board was unable to find the contested fitness report was given as a form of punishment.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05599-03
The Board, consisting of Mr. McPartlin, Mr. Pfeiffer, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 5 August 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05609-03
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD F O R C O R R E C T I O N OF N A V A L R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP:ecb Docket No: 5609-03 29 July 2003 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Beckett, and Agresti, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 29 July 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05637-03
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an increased amount of zone "B" Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the IT rating (NEC 2735). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunne, Frankfurt, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 15 October 2003 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05643-03
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR C O R R E C T I O N O F NAVAL RECORDS 2 N A V Y A N N E X WASHINGTON D C 20370-5100 JLP: ecb Docket No: 5643-03 21 October 2003 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05645-03
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F NAVAL R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 MEH:ecb Docket No: 5645-03 7 October 2003 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj : REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05648-03
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to a reentry code of RE-3, in place of the code of RE-4 he received show that he w&assigned on 18 march 1994. The Board, consisting reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and i pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05654-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.Lou enlisted in he Navy on 14 August 1962 at age 18. On 18 February 1965 you submitted a written...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05659-03
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR C O R R E C T I O N O F N A V A L R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X WASHINGTON D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 JLP:ecb Docket No: 5659-03 2 1 October 2003 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj : REVIEW O F NAVAL RECORD - .. Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05675-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05676-03
Based on information contained in his application, it is clear that-is not aware of the criteria or procedures required to withdraw from the SBP. Reference (b) also states, in part, that a retired member was permitted to discontinue participation in the SBP during the period 17 May 1998 to 16 May 1999. retired pay, his Program Manager Survivor Benefit Plan, Retired Activities and GI Bill Programs Branch (PERS-664) DEPARTMENT O F THE NAVY NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND 5720 INTEGRITY...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05688-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2003. 03UO658 5420 N130D1/ 10 Sep 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, NAVAL RECORDS BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF Subj : E OF PETTY OFFICER Encl: (1) BCNR case file #05688-03 with microfiche service record provides comment and recommendation on petition. enters the DEP and the day the member ships to active duty, determines the amount of EB a member is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05693-03
On 21 December 2001, the CG, Marine Corps Base imposed NJP upon Petitioner for dereliction of duty.Subj: BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS (BCNR) APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF xxxxxx USMCviolation of Article 92, UCMJ. Petitioner claims that removal of the NJP is warranted because (1) information provided to Petitioner’s commanding officer by an NCIS agent was incorrect; (2) Department regulations prevent holding Petitioner accountable for the actions of his subordinate; (3) Petitioner was...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05702-03
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Enlistment Bonus (EB) entitlement. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunne, Pfeiffer, and Frankfurt, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 15 October 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05703-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. It noted that you did not complain of any of the hallmark symptoms of that disorder during your Navy service, or for many years thereafter, and there is no indication in your Navy record that you were suffering from a significant mental disorder prior to your discharge. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05720-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05721-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. ?,lve determined that only members who transfer to the Fleet ;3eserve after 4 December 1987 are eligible for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05732-03
your United In addition, the Board considered the advisory This is in reference to your application for correction of naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the States Code, section A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2003. opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 8 July 2003, a copy of which is attached. 'service record has been reviewed and it has 1. been...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05733-03
We defer to BCNR on the issue of Lieutenant Colonel request for the removal of her failure of selection to the grade of Lieutenant Colonel. we furnished her with a copy of the Advisory Opinion Head, performance Evaluation Review Branch Personnel Management Division By direction of the Commandant of the Marine Corps DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY I i E A O Q U A R T E R S U N I T E D S T A T E S M A R I N E C O R P S 3280 R U S S E L L R O A D Q U A N T I C O . Per the reference, we reviewed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05737-03
In correspondence attached as enclosure (3), the HQMC office having cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner's request to strike his failure of selection for promotion has commented to the effect that this rcquest has merit and warrants favorable action.' Per the provisions of reference (b), the Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB) has reviewed allegations of error and injustice in your naval record. His two fitness reports from this billet have relative values of 88.43 and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05745-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2003. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board, Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05746-03
A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board did not consider whether your characterization of service or reason for separation should be changed, since you did not ask for such...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05747-03
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD F O R C O R R E C T I O N OF N A V A L R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 5747-03 20 August 2003 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05749-03
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that the orders releasing Petitioner from active duty were issued prior to 2 1 January 2003. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Agresti, McBride, and Neuschafer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 October 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05758-03
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he elected to participate in the MGIB Program when first eligible.. 2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunne, Pfeiffer, and Frankfurt, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 15 October 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05774-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board did not consider whether the characterization of service or reason for separation should be changed since you did not request such action and you have not exhausted your administrative remedies by applying to the Naval Discharge and Review Board (NDRB). Consequently, when applying...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05779-03
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitled to payment of full separation pay. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Agresti, Beckett, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 29 July 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05815-03
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Following his first failure of selection he successfully petitioned the BCNR to remove his failure of selection. In our opinion, it is definitely unlikely that should have been selected for promotion had the missing report been added to his record prior to the board.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05817-03
The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows: He was considered by the mobilization disposition board convened in August 1995, which resulted in his transfer to the ISL on 1 September 1995. d. Relying on title 10, United States Code, section 12642, Petitioner contends that his failures of selection to commander should be removed (and by implication, his consequent discharge should be set aside), because...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05825-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. is requesting to be advanced to HM2 due 2. to an administrative error in processing his award points.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05848-03
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Reference (b) listed a zone 'C" SRB entitlement for the MA rate at the time the petitioner received BUPERS order 2402. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05850-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 September 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The reenlistment code was assigned based on his overall record and means that he did not meet the physical/ medical standards for reenlistment at the time of separation. The reenlistment code assigned by the Marine...