Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05825-03
Original file (05825-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY 

BOARD  FOR  C O R R E C T I O N   O F   NAVAL  R E C O R D S  

2   N A V Y A N N E X  

W A S H I N G T O N   DC  2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0  

LCC:ecb 
Docket No:  5825-03 
15 October 2003 

This is in  reference to  your application for correction of your  naval  record  pursuant to the 
provisions of  title  10 of  the United  States Code, section  1552. 

A  three-member panel of  the Board  for Correction of  Naval  Records,  sitting in  executive session, 
considered your  application on  15 October 2003.  Your  allegations of  error and  injustice were 
reviewed  in  accordance with  administrative regulations and  procedures applicable to the 
proceedings of  this Board.  Documentary  material  considered by  the Board consisted of  your 
application, together with  all  material submitted in  support thereof,  your  naval record  and 
applicable statutes, regulations and  policies.  In  addition, the Board  considered the advisory 
opinion furnished by  NAVPERSCMD memorandum  1430 Ser 81 1A11425 dated 27 August 2003, 
a copy of  which  is attached. 

After careful and  conscientious consideration of  the entire record,  the Board  found that the 
evidence submitted  was insufficient to establish the existence of  probable material error or 
injustice.  In  this connection, the Board  substantially concurred with  the comments contained in 
the advisory opinion.  Accordingly, your  application  has been  denied.  The names and  votes of 
the members of  the panel  will  be  furnished upon  request. 

It is regretted that  the circumstances of  your case are such  that favorable action cannot be taken. 
You  are entitled to have the Board  reconsider its decision  upon  submission of  new  and  material 
evidence or other matter not previously considered by  the Board.  In  this regard, it is important 
to  keep in  mind  that a presumption  of  regularity attaches to all official records.  Consequently, 
when  applying for a correction of  an  official naval  record, the burden  is on  the applicant to 
demonstrate the existence of  probable material error or injustice. 

Sincerely, n 

Executive Direc 

Enclosure 

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 

NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND 

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE 

MILLINGTON T N  38055-0000 

1430 
Ser 811A1/425 
27 Aug 03 

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL 

RECORDS (BCNR) 

Via:  Assistant for BCNR Matters  (PERS-OOZCB) 

Ref : 

(a) BUPERSINST 1430.163 

Encl:  (1) BCNR file #05825-03 

1.  Based on policy and guidelines established in reference (a), 
enclosure (1) is. returned recommending disapproval. 

. . 

is requesting to be advanced to HM2 due 

2. 
to an administrative error in processing his award points.  Petty 
Officer -articipated 
in cycle 179, March 2003 exam for HM2 
and became a selectee.  His exam was subsequently re-scored due 
to his award points being in error.  He received a corrected 
profile sheet, which showed him as passed but not advance.  There 
are no provisions in reference (a) to authorize his promotion due 
to an administrative error.  No relief can be granted regarding 
this petition. 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05431-03

    Original file (05431-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03834-03

    Original file (03834-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04568-03

    Original file (04568-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely, hv Executive Director Enclosure DIPARIMBWT OF TI41 NAVY 1430 Ser 8llAl/ 351 17 Jul 03 MEMORANDUM FOR...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10603-02

    Original file (10603-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 June 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09593-02

    Original file (09593-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05720-03

    Original file (05720-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01164-02

    Original file (01164-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N OF N A V A L R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N DC 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 LCCl:

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04365-03

    Original file (04365-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06725-07

    Original file (06725-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 811E9/462 of 18 September 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06557-02

    Original file (06557-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The FMS required for advancement to MS2 for that cycle was 181.58. in the March 1994 (Cycle 143) Navywide 3.-was credited with 4 award points for Cycle 143.