Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05431-03
Original file (05431-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT  OF THE  NAVY 

BOARD  F O R   C O R R E C T I O N  OF  NAVAL  R E C O R D S  

2  N A V Y A N N E X  

W A S H I N G T O N   DC  2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0  

LCC:ecb 
Docket No:  5431-03 
15 October 2003 

This is in  reference to  your  application  for correction of  your naval  record pursuant to the 
provisions of  title  10 of  the United  States Code,  section  1552. 

A three-member panel of  the Board  for Correction of  Naval  Records, sitting in  executive session, 
considered your application on  15 October 2003.  Your  allegations of error and injustice were 
reviewed in  accordance with  administrative regulations and  procedures applicable to  the 
proceedings of  this Board.  Documentary  material considered by  the Board consisted of  your 
application, together with  all  material  submitted  in  support thereof,  your  naval  record and 
applicable statutes, regulations and  policies.  In  addition, the Board  considered  the advisory 
opinion  furnished by  NAVPERCMD memorandum  1430 Ser 81 1Al429 dated  27 August  2003, a 
copy of  which  is attached. 

After careful and  conscientious consideration of  the entire record, the Board  found that the 
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of  probable material error or 
injustice.  In  this connection, the Board  substantially concurred with  the comments contained in 
the advisory opinion.  Accordingly, your application has been  denied.  The names and  votes of 
the  members of  the panel  will be  furnished  upon  request. 

It  is regretted that the circumstances of  your  case are such  that  favorable action  cannot be  taken. 
You  are entitled to  have the Board  reconsider its decision upon  submission of  new  and  material 
evidence or other  matter not previously  considered by  the Board.  In  this regard,  it is important 
to  keep  in  mind  that a presumption of  regularity attaches to  all official records.  Consequently, 
when  applying for a correction of  an  official naval  record, the burden  is on  the applicant to 
demonstrate the existence of  probable material error or injustice. 

Sincerely, 

Enclosure 

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 

NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND 

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE 

MILLINGTON T N  38055-0000 

1430 
Ser 8llAl /C/zq 
27 Aug 03 

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL 

RECORDS  (BCNR) 

Via:  Assistant for BCNR Matters  (PERS-OOXCB) 

Ref:  (a) BUPERSINST 1430.163 

Encl:  (1) BCNR file #05431-03 

1.  Based on policy and guidilines established in reference (a) . 

enclosure (1) is returned recommending disapproval. 

2.  -id 
exam which resulted in a Passed but not Advanced  (PNA). 

participate in March 2003. cycle 179 

3.  His effort to study for the exam is commendable however, not 
knowing the exact information to be included on either the 
regular or substitute exam does not preclude a favorable 
recommendation and cannot 

this petition. 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05825-03

    Original file (05825-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. is requesting to be advanced to HM2 due 2. to an administrative error in processing his award points.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04568-03

    Original file (04568-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely, hv Executive Director Enclosure DIPARIMBWT OF TI41 NAVY 1430 Ser 8llAl/ 351 17 Jul 03 MEMORANDUM FOR...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10603-02

    Original file (10603-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 June 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03834-03

    Original file (03834-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05720-03

    Original file (05720-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04365-03

    Original file (04365-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09593-02

    Original file (09593-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01164-02

    Original file (01164-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N OF N A V A L R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N DC 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 LCCl:

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05675-03

    Original file (05675-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00177-03

    Original file (00177-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.