Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05325-03
Original file (05325-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 

NAVY 

ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

BJG
Docket No: 5325-03
3 September 2003

From:
To:

Subj 

:

Ref:

Encl:

Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Secretary of the Navy

6)
(1)
(2)
(2)
(3)

Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

DD Form 149 dtd 6 Jun 03 w/attachment
BCNR rept to SECNAV, docket no: 7503-02,
dtd 29 Aug 02 less 
HQMC MMOA-4 memo dtd 18 Aug 03
Subject’s naval record

encls

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner,
filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of major he
would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year
(FY) 2003 Major Selection Board, vice the FY 2004 Major Selection Board.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Adams, Geisler and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s
allegations of error and injustice on 28 August 
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

2003, and pursuant to its regulations,

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations
of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies

available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b.

In Petitioner’s prior case (copy of report of proceedings at enclosure 

(2)), the
Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) Performance Evaluation Review Board directed
substitution of a fitness report, and this Board approved removing his failure of selection by
the FY 2003 Major Selection Board. He was selected by the FY 2004 Major Selection
Board, and he was promoted with a 1 March 2003 date of rank and effective date.

In correspondence attached as enclosure 

(3), the HQMC office with cognizance over

C.

the subject matter of this case has commented to the effect that Petitioner ’s request has merit
and warrants favorable action. This advisory opinion specifically recommended the
adjustment of his date of rank and effective date to 1 May 2002. They determined that this is
the date of rank and effective date he would have received, had he been promoted pursuant to
selection by the FY 2003 Major Selection Board.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of
contents of enclosure 
(3), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the
following corrective action.

the

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show his date of
rank and effective date in the grade of major as 1 May 2002, vice 1 March 2003; and that his
lineal precedence be adjusted accordingly.

b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board ’s

recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner ’s record and
that no such entries or material be added to the record in the future.

C. That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner ’s naval record be returned

to the Board, together with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross reference being made a part of
Petitioner’s naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board ’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete
record of the Board ’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder

JONATHAN S. 
Acting Recorder

RUSKIN

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of
the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by
the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

Executive 

Direct0

3

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

HEADQUARTERS 

UNITED  STATES  MARINE  CORPS

~~~ORUSSELLROAD

QUANTICO,

 

VlRGlNlA  22 

134-5  

103

IN  REPLY REFER TO:

160 0
MMOA-4
18 Aug 03

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION

OF NAVAL RECORDS

ON FOR 
SMC

MAJO

Ref:

(a) 

B
M
8

Recommend approval o

1.
dating of his date of

rank and 

ase o f
USMC

backpay.

request for back-

we review

Selection Board.

Per the reference

2.
and petition.
USMC Major
Performance Evaluation Review Board  
Change of Reporting Senior report dated 20010616 to 20010831
and have t
rt of the same date removed from
his OMPF.
as subsequently selected for
on the FY04 USMC Major Selection

He successfully petitioned the
(PERB)  to submit a new

s record
the FY03

equests back-dating of his date of

rank and  ba

In our opinion,

the petitioned fitness report contained

3.
competitive concerns that may have resulted in the failure
of selection.
to Major
replacement
he was selected for promotion to Major, we
recommend approval of his request for back-dating of his

Since the removed report may have contributed
k,lure  of selection, and following the

Lieutenant Colonel, USMC
Head, Officer Counseling  
Evaluation Section
Officer Assignment Branch
Personnel Management Division

&



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00658-03

    Original file (00658-03.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of major he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2002 Major Selection Board, vice the FY 2003 Major Selection Board. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunne,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10850-02

    Original file (10850-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of chief warrant officer 4 (CWO4) he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2001 CWO4 Selection Board, vice the FY 2003 CWO4 Selection Board. After he had been...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01252-02

    Original file (01252-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of lieutenant colonel he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the (FY) 2002 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, vice the FY 2003 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board. That Petitioner...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09420-02

    Original file (09420-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Taylor, Tew and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 December 2002, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Cap Captain Select Performance Evaluation Review Board Transfer fitness report from 990908 to 991113. subsequently selected for promotion USMC Captain Selection Board. and following the removal Capta he was selected for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05326-01

    Original file (05326-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected by removing his failures by the FY 1996 and 1997 Major Selection Boards. 's record and his FY-96 and FY-97 920528. Point of contact Major, U.S. Marine Corps Head, Officer Counseling and Evaluation Section Officer Assignment Branch Personnel Management Division DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS D 3280 RUSSELL ROA QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 221 34-51 0 Y 3 IN REPLY REFER TO: 1600 MMOA-4 14 Aug 01 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09834-02

    Original file (09834-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Agresti, Mimer and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner ’s allegations’ of error and injustice on 18 December 2002, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. After Petitioner had failed of selection by the FY 2002 Captain Selection Board, the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board directed removal of a fitness report. Captai Captain bove-Zone...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03977-01

    Original file (03977-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of major he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year originally specifically requested that his major date of rank and effective date be changed to 1 June 2000, but the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04943-03

    Original file (04943-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of lieutenant colonel he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2003 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, vice the FY 2004 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02737-01

    Original file (02737-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    filed enclosure ( 1 ) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of major he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2001 Major Selection Board, vice the FY 2002 Major Selection Board. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Adams and Harrison and Ms. Moidel, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 31 May...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03152-99

    Original file (03152-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of lieutenant colonel he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 1997 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, vice the FY 2000 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board. He...