DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD F O R C O R R E C T I O N OF N A V A L R E C O R D S
2 N A V Y A N N E X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No: 5747-03
20 August 2003
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 20 August 2003. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory
pinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 8 July 2003,
a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
he
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
-
Executive D i r
Enclosure
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
IN REPLY REFER TO:
1040
MMER/RE
0 8 2003
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
3280 R U S S E L L R O A D
Q U A N T I C O . V I R G I N I A 2 2 1 34-5 1 0 3
H E A D Q U A R T E R S U N I T E D STATES M A R I N E C O R P S
Subj: BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF FORMER PRIVATE - SUBJ: RECODE
Encl: (1) NAVMC 118(11) of 12 Jul 99
NAVAL RECORDS
(2)
.
. .
D Form 149 of 14 May 2003
service record has been reviewed and it has been
reenlistment code of RE-3F was correctly
assigned. The reenlistment code was assigned based on his
overall record and simply means that he failed to complete
recruit training.
separated on July 15, 1999 by reason of
2. -s
Defective Enlistment & Induction - Fraudulent - Drug Abuse/~rug
Trafficking. A review of his service record indicates that he
was counseled concerning not being recommended for reenlistment.
It is also noted that on July 12, 1999 he signed an official
service record book entry acknowledging assignment of the RE-3F
reenlistment code. Enclosure (1) refers.
3. After a review of all relevant information, this Headquarters
concurs in the professional evaluation of
cations for reenlistment at the time of s e T O n c e a code
is correctly assigned it is not routinely changed or upgraded as
a result of events that occur after separation or based merely on
the passage of time.
qualifi-
4. Enclosure (2) is returned for final action.
Review Branch
Personnel Management Division
By direction of the Commandant
of the Marine Corps
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05894-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2003. 'service record has been reviewed and it has been determined that his reenlistment code of RE-3F was correctly assigned. It is also noted that on March 22, 1994 he signed an official service record book entry acknowledging assignment of the RE-3F reenlistment code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02328-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 11 March 2003, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02963-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03072-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 June 2003. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 8 April 2003, a copy of which is attached. The Board did not consider whether your characterization of service or reason for separation should be changed, since you did not ask for such consideration and you have not exhausted your administrative remedy...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03070-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. V I R G I N I A 22 134-5 103 ly VgbY REFER TO: MMER/RE R M E W 0 7 2003 Subj: BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF F O NAVAL RECORDS MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF 1. - service record has been reviewed and it has been determined that his reenlistment code of RE-3C...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03176-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your nayal record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by ~eadquarters Marine Corps dated 11 April 2003, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03364-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 July 2003. After review by the discharge authority, the recommendation for separation was approved and on 16 February 1996 you received 'a general discharge by reason of llinvoluntary discharge directed by established directive^.^^ At that time, you were assigned a reenlistment code of RE-4. The reenlistment code was assigned based on his overall record and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03074-03
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Doc ,et No: 3074-03 7 M a v 2003 This is in reference to your application for corr'ectlon of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title States Code, section 1552. of the United A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00889-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The reenlistment code assigned by the Marine Corps is an administrative marking which reflects the member's acceptability for reenlistment at the time...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05745-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2003. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board, Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...