Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05720-03
Original file (05720-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE  NAVY 

B O A R D  F O R   C O R R E C T I O N   O F   N A V A L  R E C O R D S  

2  N A V Y A N N E X  

W A S H I N G T O N   D C   20370-5100 

LCC:ecb 
Docket No:  5720-03 
15 October 2003 

This is in  reference to  your  application for correction of  your  naval record pursuant to the 
provisions of  title  10 of  the United  States Code, section  1552. 

A  three-member panel  of  the Board  for Correction of  Naval  Records,  sitting in  executive session, 
considered your application on  15 October 2003.  Your allegations of  error and  injustice were 
reviewed in  accordance with  administrative regulations and  procedures applicable to the 
proceedings of  this Board.  Documentary material considered by  the Board consisted of  your 
application, together  with  all material submitted  in  support thereof, your  naval record and 
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.  In  addition, the Board  considered the advisory 
opinion  furnished by  NAVPERCMD memorandum  1430 Ser 81 1A11426 dated 27 August 2003, a 
copy of  which  is attached. 

After  careful and  conscientious consideration of  the entire record, the Board  found that the 
evidence submitted was  insufficient to establish the existence of  probable material error or 
injustice.  In  this connection, the Board  substantially concurred with  the comments contained in 
the advisory opinion.  Accordingly, your application has been  denied.  The names and  votes of 
the members of  the panel  will be furnished  upon  request. 

It is regretted that  the circumstances of  your case are such that  favorable action cannot be taken. 
You  are entitled to  have the Board  reconsider its decision upon  submission of  new  and  material 
evidence or other  matter  not previously considered by  the Board.  In  this regard, it is important 
to  keep in  mind  that a presumption of  regularity attaches to all official records.  Consequently, 
when  applying for a correction of  an  official naval  record, the burden  is on  the applicant to 
demonstrate the existence of  probable material error or injustice. 

Sincerely, 

Enclosure 

DEPARTMENT O F  THE NAVY 

NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND 

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE 

MILLINGTON T N  38055-0000 

1430 
Ser 811A1/4,26 
27 Aug 03 

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL 

RECORDS (BCNR) 

Via : 

Assistant for BCNR Matters  (PERS-OOXCB) 

Subj:  COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE CASE OF 

Ref: 

(a) BUPERSINST 1430.163 

Encl : 

(1) BCNR file #05720-03 

1.  Based on policy and guidelines established in reference (a), 
enclosure (1) is returned recommending disapproval. 
2. .- 
indication of his selection to Chief Petty Officer or a 
indication of actual advancement.  No relief can be recommended 

records have been reviewed.  There is no 

By direction 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05431-03

    Original file (05431-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05825-03

    Original file (05825-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. is requesting to be advanced to HM2 due 2. to an administrative error in processing his award points.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10603-02

    Original file (10603-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 June 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04365-03

    Original file (04365-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03820-99

    Original file (03820-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06557-02

    Original file (06557-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The FMS required for advancement to MS2 for that cycle was 181.58. in the March 1994 (Cycle 143) Navywide 3.-was credited with 4 award points for Cycle 143.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04568-03

    Original file (04568-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely, hv Executive Director Enclosure DIPARIMBWT OF TI41 NAVY 1430 Ser 8llAl/ 351 17 Jul 03 MEMORANDUM FOR...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05675-03

    Original file (05675-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06337-03

    Original file (06337-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner requests to receive the additional award level for the LSRB UIC 44321. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for' the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05127-03

    Original file (05127-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner was selected to the STA-21 officer program in October 2001. The petitioner requests to receive SRB offered in reference (b) based on the reenlistment of 19 July 2002.