DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVALRECORDS
2
NAVY
ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No: 5732-03
8 September 2003
c552.
your
United
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
This is in reference to your application for correction of
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
States Code, section
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 4 September 2003.
Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 8 July 2003,
a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The Board did not consider whether your characterization of
service or reason for separation should be changed, since you did
not ask for such consideration and you have not exhausted your
administrative remedy by applying to the Naval Discharge Review
Board (NDRB).
You may apply to NDRB by submitting the attached
DD Form 293.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
In this connection, the Board substantially
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Enclosure
2
3280
RUSSElI. ROA D
QUANTICO. VIRGINIA 22
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
134-S 103
TO:
IN REPLY REFER
1040
MMER/RE
,&L
0 8 2003
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS
Subj:
BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF
--cy"-I' SUBJ: RECODE
Encl:
(1)
2 DD Form 149 of 27 May 2003
1
.
'service record has been reviewed and it has
1.
been determined that his reenlistment code of RE-4 was correctly
assigned.
overall record and means that he was not recommended for
reenlistment at the time of separation.
The reenlistment code was assigned based on his
was discharged Under Other Than Honorable Conditions
2.
on February 22, 2000 by reason of Failure to Participate. A
review of the administrative portion of the service record
indicates that he was counseled concerning not being recommend&d
for promotion, unsatisfactory participation, and unexcused
absence.
due to unsatisfactory
It is also noted that he was administratively reduced
perticipation.
After a review of all relevant information, this Headquarters
3.
concurs in the professional evaluation of
cations for reenlistment at the time of separation.
is correctly assigned it is not routinely changed or upgraded as
a result of events that occur after separation or based merely
on the passage of time.
4 .
The enclosure is returned for final action.
qualifi-
Once a code
'
_
Review Branch
Personnel Management Division
By direction of the Commandant
of the Marine Corps
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 05251-04
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 17 June 2004, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficienttheestablish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05165-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board did not consider whether your characterization of service or reason for separation should be changed, since you have not exhausted your administrative remedies by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00400-10
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board did not consider whether your characterization of service or reason for separation should be changed, since you did not request such consideration and you have not exhausted your administrative remedies by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05746-03
A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board did not consider whether your characterization of service or reason for separation should be changed, since you did not ask for such...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06336-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your Your allegations of error and application on 10 September 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 18 July 2003, a copy of which...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02807-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 June 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 28 March 2003, a copy of which is attached. overall record and means that he was not recommended for reenlistment at the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02757-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations ‘and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. * service record has been reviewed and it hasbeen determined that his reenlistment code of RE-4 was correctly assigned.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02041-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The reenlistment code assigned by the Marine Corps is an administrative marking which reflects the member's acceptability for reenlistment at the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03072-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 June 2003. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 8 April 2003, a copy of which is attached. The Board did not consider whether your characterization of service or reason for separation should be changed, since you did not ask for such consideration and you have not exhausted your administrative remedy...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05850-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 September 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The reenlistment code was assigned based on his overall record and means that he did not meet the physical/ medical standards for reenlistment at the time of separation. The reenlistment code assigned by the Marine...