Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05447-03
Original file (05447-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION

2 

NAVY 

OFNAVAL RECORDS

 
ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

JLP: ecb
Docket No:  
28 October 2003

5447-03

Dear

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session,
considered your application on 28 October 2003.
Your allegations of error and injustice were
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser
copy of which is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

 

N130C3/03U0638 dated 5 September 2003, a

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application   has been denied.   The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important
Consequently,

Sincerely,

Executive Direct

Enclosure

IN 

REPLY  REFER TO.

7220
Ser 
5 Sep 2003

N130C3/03U0638

DEPARTMENTOFTHENA

W
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS

2000 NAVY PENTAGON

WASHINGTON,D.C.

 

20350-2000

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION

OF NAVAL RECORDS

Via:

Assistant for BCNR Matters, Pers-OOXCB

Subj:

Ref:

Encl:

ONS ICO

(a) DODFMR, Volume  
(b) Military Pay Advisory (MPA)  

7A, Chapter   35, Feb 02

81/00

(1) BCNR Case File  

Record

#05447-03  w/Microfiche Service

1. Per your request,
enclosure (1) is provided.

the following recommendation concerning

2. The petitioner is requesting authorization to sell back 46 days
leave upon his first 2 months extension of a six year reenlistment
contract agreement on 10 July 1998 to a new EAOS of 09 September
2004 and to reinstate 15.5 lost leave days.

3. A review of enclosure (1) revealed that he signed a 72 months
operative reenlistment contract with an 2 months extension to a
The petitioner signed a NAVPERS
new EAOS of 09 September 2004.
1070/613  electing to carry leave over to new/extended enlistment.
IAW reference (a) Table 35-4 Rule 2,
service who has been on active duty for 30 days or more
consecutive days and voluntarily first extends his/her enlistment
regardless of duration of extension and continues on active duty
in an extension period then accrued leave is payable on the day
before effective date of his/her extension.

members of any military

4. Defense Joint Military Pay System-Active component (DJMS-AC)
uses the Last-In-First-Out (LIFO) rule to determine what leave is
DFAS-
charged when a member uses leave.
Cleveland received a ruling that LIFO is the correct method and
effective immediately DFAS-CL will no longer make adjustment of
leave balances to minimize leave lost at the end of the FY based
on the LIFO rule.

IAW reference  

(b) 

Subj:

N130C  recommends disapproval of the petitioner's request to

5. 
sell back 46 days LSL and to reinstated 15.5 lost leave days IAW
references (a) and (b).

Assistant Head, Pay and

Allowances Section  

(N130C)



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04403-01

    Original file (04403-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 JLP:ddj Docket No: 4403-01 10 October 200 1 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title Ilnited States Code, section 10 of the 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your proceedings application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02687-01

    Original file (02687-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER of which is attached. AC) uses the Last-In-First-Out (LIFO) rule to determine what IAW reference leave is charged when a member takes leave.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08112-01

    Original file (08112-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. AC) uses the Last-In-First-Out (LIFO) rule to determine what IAW reference leave is charged when a member takes leave.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03062-01

    Original file (03062-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD X 2 NAVY ANNE S WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JLP: ddj Docket No: 3062-01 5 September 2001 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06905-98

    Original file (06905-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Enclosure (1) does not contain evidence to support the 4. petitioner's claim that an administrative oversight...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05145-02

    Original file (05145-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive 611 24 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. IAW reference (b) 6.16-2, service members who are 4. assigned to a designated deployable ship, operating away from homeport for 60...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08158-00

    Original file (08158-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03793-01

    Original file (03793-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04095-02

    Original file (04095-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser which is attached. MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTIONS OF NAVAL RECORDS Assistant for BCNR Matters, Pers-OOXCB Via: Subj: .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05622-98

    Original file (05622-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 February 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...