Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05675-03
Original file (05675-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF  THE  NAVY 

B O A R D F O R   C O R R E C T I O N   OF  NAVAL  R E C O R D S  

2  N A V Y A N N E X  

W A S H I N G T O N   D C   2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0  

MEH:ecb 
Docket No:  5675-03 
15 October 2003 

This is in reference to your application for correction of  your  naval  record pursuant to the 
provisions of  title  10 of  the United  States Code, section  1552. 

A  three-member panel of the Board  for Correction of  Naval  Records,  sitting in  executive session, 
considered your  application on  15 October 2003.  Your  allegations of  error and  injustice were 
reviewed  in  accordance with  administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the 
proceedings of  this Board.  Documentary  material considered by  the Board  consisted of  your 
application, together with  all material submitted in  support thereof, your  naval  record and 
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.  In  addition, the Board  considered the advisory 
opinion  furnished by  PERS  memorandum  1160 Ser 81 11433 dated  15 September 2003, a copy of 
which  is attached. 

After  careful and  conscientious consideration of  the entire record, the Board  found that the 
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of  probable material error or 
injustice.  In  this connection, the Board  substantially concurred with  the comments contained in 
the advisory  opinion.  Accordingly, your  application has bun Jcnicd.  The name5 and votes of 
the members of  the panel  will  be  furnished upon  request. 

It is regretted that the circumstances of  your  case are such  that favorable action cannot be taken. 
You  are entitled to have the Board  reconsider its decision  upon  submission of  new  and  material 
evidence or other matter not previously considered by  the Board.  In  this regard, it is important 
to keep in  mind  that a presumption  of  regularity attaches to all official records.  Consequently, 
when  applying for a correction of  an  official naval  record, the burden  is on  the applicant to 
demonstrate the existence of  probable material error or injustice. 

Sincerely, 

Enclosure 

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 

NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND 

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE 

MILLINGT O N  TN 38055-0000 

1160 
Ser 811/433 
15 Sep 2003 

MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD 

Via : 

PERS-OOZCB 

Ref: 

(a) SNM'S DD Form 149 dtd 23 Jun 03 
(b) NAVADMIN 352/02 
(c) NAVADMIN 159/03 

Encl : 

(1) BCNR File 

1.  In response to reference (a), recommend disapproval to the 
petitioner's request. 

2.  The petitioner reenlisted on 14 February 2003 for six years to 
have sufficient obliserve for BUPERS order 1782 to attend NEC 8408 
driven 'C"  school training.  Reference  (b) did not have the NEC 
8408 on the SRB award level list at the time the petitioner 
reenlisted. 

3.  Reference (c) released on 19 June 2003 added the NEC 8408 to 
the SRB award level list.  The petitioner requests to receive zone 
"B" SRB  upon graduation on 27 August 2004. 

Naval  Personnel  Command/OPNAV  cannot  provide  information 
4. 
-fir+ 2.; 1.i r.7  to  m
EI?!JS7?.lT4TM?  11nt i ! a£ ter  t???  F7?.??.TTn~!.T'IMTT; 
has been released.  Therefore the petitioner could not have been 
counseled concerning reference (c) prior to the reenlistment.  The 
petitionerfs hindsight  is  not  sufficient grounds  to  expunge  the 
reenlistment or receive the SRB payment as no error or injustice 
was committed. 

?I??. 

i

 

5.  In view of the above, recommend the petitioner's record remain 
as is. 

Subj :  BCNR PETITION ICO H-

 

USN, 

6.  This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by 
the Board for correction of Naval Records  (BCNR) only.  Enclosure 

(1) is returned.  - MMC(SS) USN 

Reenlistment Incentives Branch 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05127-03

    Original file (05127-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner was selected to the STA-21 officer program in October 2001. The petitioner requests to receive SRB offered in reference (b) based on the reenlistment of 19 July 2002.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00177-03

    Original file (00177-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06337-03

    Original file (06337-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner requests to receive the additional award level for the LSRB UIC 44321. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for' the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03281-99

    Original file (03281-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BUREAU OF NAVAL PERSONNEL, 5 7 2 0 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000 IN R E P L Y R E F E R TO 1160 PERS-815 26 Jul 99 MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECT ON OF NAVAL RECORDS Via: PERS-OOZCB Ref: (a)...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05848-03

    Original file (05848-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Reference (b) listed a zone 'C" SRB entitlement for the MA rate at the time the petitioner received BUPERS order 2402. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06334-03

    Original file (06334-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner requests to have the SRB payment readjusted to reflect the 4.0 award level for the Diver NEC 5342.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03422-99

    Original file (03422-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 August 1999. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUPERS Memorandum 1160 is attached. - Petitioner requests to expunge reenlistment date of 07 Dec 96 and effect a 7 month extension to his P3D of July 1997.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05392-06

    Original file (05392-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. Reference (c) provided a zone “A” SRB for NEC 8483 at the time the petitioner received orders to NEC 8483 training. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09430-02

    Original file (09430-02.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08063-02

    Original file (08063-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Reference (c) listed NAVHOSP GREAT The petitioner requests to receive the LSRB for the reenlistment...