LCC:lc
Docket No: 10538-02
9 September 2003
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2
NAVY
ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:
Secretary of the Navy
Ref: (a)
Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl:
(1)
(2)
(3)
DD Form 149 w/attachments
Series of Documents
Subject’s naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner,
filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected to show advanced when first eligible.
2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Frankfurt, Kim, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner ’s
allegations of error and injustice on 9 September 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations
of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies
available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b. After reviewing the correspondence attached as enclosure
(2), the Board concluded
that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of
contents of enclosure
(2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the
following corrective action.
the
Docket No: 10538-02
RECOMMENDATION:
That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:
a. Petitioner was advanced to
paygrade E-4 effective 17 August 1990.
b. That part of Petitioner ’s request to backdate the effective date of advancement to
paygrades E-5 and E-6 was denied. The request was denied because the score from the first
E-5 Exam Petitioner took did not meet any of the Final Multiple Scores from previous exams
that an individual had to meet to be a selectee. Consideration to backdate E-6 was not
considered since E-5 could not be backdated to provide an earlier eligibility consideration
zone for E-6.
C. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner ’s naval record.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board ’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete
record of the Board ’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder
\QW-d-
G. L. ADAMS
Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of
the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by
the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
9 September 2003
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08035-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Novello, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 15 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08659-98
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Goldsmith, Milner, and Ms. Nofziger, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 May 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00375-03
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 August 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06639-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner earned Pass Not Advanced 2001 Exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Harrison, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 29 October 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06523-98
Y DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 203704100 LCC:ddj Docket No: 6523-98 1 April 1999 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06804-01
1552 Encl: (1) (2) (3) DD Form 149 w/attachments Series of Documents Subject’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, in effect, that the applicable naval record be 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, corrected to show enlistment in a higher paygrade. 25 September 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, iil_lustice on , reviewed Petitioner ’s 3. (2), the Board tinds the existence of an injustice warranting...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00997-02
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Mackey, Pauling, and Ms. McCorniick, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 9 April 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an i~ijustice warranting the following corrective action. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07282-01
1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Series of Documents (3) Sub_ject’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, corrected to show enlistment in a higher paygrade. of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, in effect, that the applicable naval record be The Board, consisting of Messrs. 2. allegations of error and determined that the corrective evidence of record. aclclressed in Petitioner ’s application has commented...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07485-98
Y DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC:ddj Docket No: 7485-98 1 April 1999 From: To: Subj : Ref: Encl: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary, of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD (a) (1) (2) (3) Title 16 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07973-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced to paygrade E-4 effective 16 September 200 1. allega\.ions of error and 2. (2), the Board finds the existence of an and especially in light of the iI?justice warranting the RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: Docket No:...