Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10415-02
Original file (10415-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 

NAVY 

ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

TJR
Docket No: 10415-02
12 September 2003

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 9 September 2003.
Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application,
together with all material submitted in support
thereof,
your naval record,
and applicable statutes, regulations,
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
You enlisted in the Navy on 11 May 1966 at age 17.
1967 you received nonjudicial punishment 
duty and were awarded a $50 forfeiture of pay and correctional
custody for 20 days.
During the period from 1 to 20 February 1967, after being
referred for medical evaluations for anxiety reactions and acute
anxiety with depression, you were diagnosed with an emotionally
unstable personality manifested by your failure to accept
responsibility, poor judgment,
resentment of authority figures,
fluctuating emotional attitudes,
and poor control of anxiety and
hostility.
separation.
On 28 March 1967 you were notified of pending separation action
by reason of unsuitability due to the diagnosed character and
behavior disorder and the NJP.
counsel, you waived your right to submit a statement in rebuttal
to the separation.
written request for a honorable or general discharge  stating, in

After consulting with legal
On 9 May 1967 legal counsel submitted a

At that time you were recommended for immediate

On 10 January
(NJP) for dereliction of

Subsequently, on 15 June 1967, the

Your conduct average was 2.0.

On 31 May 1967 your commanding officer recommended

part, that your past conduct reflected credit upon the Naval
Service.
separation by reason of unsuitability, stating in part, that
further retention in the service would not be in the best
interest of the Navy.
discharge authority directed separation with the type of
discharge warranted by your service record, and on 23 June 1967
you were issued a general discharge by reason of unsuitability.
Character of service is based, in part,
on conduct and overall
trait averages which are computed from marks assigned during
periodic evaluations.
An average
of 3.0 in conduct was required at the time of your separation for
a fully honorable characterization of service.
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your youth and immaturity,
the diagnosed character and behavior
disorder, and post service conduct.
Nevertheless, the Board
concluded these factors and contention were not sufficient to
warrant recharacterization of your discharge because of the NJP
and since your conduct average was insufficiently high to warrant
an honorable discharge.
Accordingly, your application has been
denied.
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Executive 

Dir

2



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05486-99

    Original file (05486-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Reenlistme On 31 OCT 64, Review of medical record reveals initial normal physical exam The patient presented with complaints of anxiety on 4. on 15 MAR 62. His active duty behavior (related to what and The tremor, would now be diagnosed as a personality disorder). has been diagnosed as an initially felt to be related to anxiety, Therefore, I essential tremor and th recommend that former character of the discharge to request for change of the "medical" be denied.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08479-01

    Original file (08479-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2002. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. circumstances in your case the Board concluded your discharge was proper as issued and no change is warranted.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR519 13

    Original file (NR519 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge because of your lengthy...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07585-10

    Original file (07585-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 May 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and polic.es.. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10210-02

    Original file (10210-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 September 2003. Subsequently, you were notified of pending separation action by reason of unsuitability due to the diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06282-00

    Original file (06282-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You continued to serve in the Marine Corps and whea you You were honorably discharged on During this period you Individuals discharged for unsuitability received the type of Character of service discharge warranted by the service record. The Board also noted your In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors such as your youth and immaturity, subsequent honorable service in Vietnam in which you were twice wounded in combat, and your...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07567-08

    Original file (07567-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 June 2009. Furthermore, disciplinary action and an administrative separation are appropriate for alcohol related offenses. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04202-01

    Original file (04202-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01156

    Original file (ND99-01156.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No indication of appeal in the record.980209: Mental Health Dept, Naval Ambulatory Care Center, Groton, CT: CHIEF COMPLAINT: Pt reported to his command in January 198 that he was having suicidal thoughts and he was transferred TAD to Group 2 for further assessment. Recommendation made at that time that he continue aboard the USS OKLAHOMA CITY and further recommended that pt seek further mental health eval should his anxiety continue after the boat transferred to Norfolk. Additionally,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06514-08

    Original file (06514-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all Material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your general discharge because of your...