Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10574-02
Original file (10574-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

         LCC:ddj
Docket No: 10574-02
20 March 2003

From:    Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:      Secretary of the Navy

Subj:
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD

Ref:     (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

End:     (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2)      NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 81 1A1/075 of 5 February 2003
(3)      Subject’s naval record

1.       Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible.

2.       The Board, consisting of Messrs. Kim, McPartlin, and Nicholson, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 March 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3.       The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a.       Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b.       In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.


Docket No: 10574-02

RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:

a.       Petitioner was advanced to paygrade E-5 effective 16 September 2002.

b.       That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner’s naval record.

4.       Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN        G.L. ADAMS
Recorder         Acting Recorder

5.       Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
        

         20 March 2003   

        
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
         Executive Director
                          

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09673-02

    Original file (09673-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Leeman, Pfeiffer, and Cooper, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 March 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10462-02

    Original file (10462-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an increased amount of zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the ETSW rating and advancement under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Leeman, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09486-02

    Original file (09486-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to he reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Mr. Leeman, Mr. Pfeiffer, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 15 April 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02690-02

    Original file (02690-02.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in paygrade E2 based on the completion of 23.5 semester credit hours (45 needed for paygrade E3). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Mimer, Pauling, and McPartlin, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 January 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09788-02

    Original file (09788-02.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Leeman, Pfeiffer, and Taylor, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 11 February 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09006-02

    Original file (09006-02.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Leeman, Pfeiffer, and Taylor, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 11 February 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09603-02

    Original file (09603-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett, Brezna, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 February 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08196-02

    Original file (08196-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provis ’ filed enclosure (1) with thi corrected to show he reenl Training and Reenlistment of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, ard requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective 2. The Board, consisting Petitioner’s allegations of regulations, determined th available evidence of enclosures, naval records, recor Mr. Beckett, Mr. Kim, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed r and injustice on 7...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10538-02

    Original file (10538-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Frankfurt, Kim, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner ’s allegations of error and injustice on 9 September 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07038-02

    Original file (07038-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett, Brezna, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 February 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations,...