Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10603-02
Original file (10603-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF  THE  NAVY 

BOARD  F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F   NAVAL  R E C O R D S  

2  N A V Y A N N E X  

W A S H I N G T O N   D C   2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0  

LCC:ddj 
Docket No:  10603-02 
3 June 2003 

This is in  reference to  your application for correction of  your  naval  record pursuant to the 
provisions of  title  10 of  the United  States Code, section  1552. 

A  three-member panel  of  the Board  for  Correction of  Naval  Records,  sitting in  executive session, 
considered your application on  3 June 2003.  Your  allegations of  error and  injustice were 
reviewed  in  accordance with  administrative regulations and  procedures applicable to  the 
proceedings of  this Board.  Documentary  material considered by  the Board  consisted of  your 
application, together with  all  material submitted in  support thereof, your  naval  record and 
applicable statutes, regulations and  policies.  In  addition, the Board  considered the advisory 
opinion  furnished by  NPC  memorandum  1430 Ser 81 1A 11214 of  6 May  2003, a copy of  which  is 
attached. 

After  careful and  conscientious consideration of  the entire record,  the Board  found that the 
evidence submitted was  insufficient to establish  the existence of  probable material error or 
injustice.  In  this connection, the Board  substantially concurred with  the comments contained in 
the advisory opinion.  Accordingly, your  application has  been  denied.  The names and  votes of 
the members of  the panel  will  be  furnished upon  request. 

It is regretted  that the circumstances of  your case are such  that favorable action cannot be taken. 
You  are entitled to  have the Board  reconsider its decision  upon  submission of  new  and  material 
evidence or other  matter  not previously considered by  the Board.  In  this regard,  it is important 
to keep in  mind  that a presumption  of regularity  attaches to all official records.  Consequently, 
when  applying for a correction of an  official naval  record,  the burden  is on  the applicant to 
demonstrate the existence of  probable material error or injustice. 

Sincerely, 

W.  DEAN  PFEIFFER 
Executive Director 

Enclosure' 

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAk r 

NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND 

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE 

MILLINGTON T N  38055-0000 

1430 
Ser 811A1/21y 
06 May 03 

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL 

RECORDS  (BCNR) 

Via:  Assistant for BCNR Matters  (PERS-OOXCB) 

Ref: 

(a) BUPERSINST 1430.163 

Encl:  (1) BCNR file #10603-02 

1.  Based on policy and guidelines established in reference (a), 
enclosure (1) is returned recommending disapproval. 

'stated he was selected for Petty Officer Second 

Class while on active duty.  There are no records to support this 

did participate in the March 1987 Navy-Wide 
d for advancement to EN3.  However, he 

exam an 
separated from active duty on 4 September 1987, which was prior 
to his pay date of 16 December 1987, which resulted in his 
separation from active duty in paygrade E-3.  No relief can be 
recommended regarding this p 

YEp, & -  

m '

 

By direction 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09593-02

    Original file (09593-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05431-03

    Original file (05431-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05825-03

    Original file (05825-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. is requesting to be advanced to HM2 due 2. to an administrative error in processing his award points.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05720-03

    Original file (05720-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04568-03

    Original file (04568-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely, hv Executive Director Enclosure DIPARIMBWT OF TI41 NAVY 1430 Ser 8llAl/ 351 17 Jul 03 MEMORANDUM FOR...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01164-02

    Original file (01164-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N OF N A V A L R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N DC 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 LCCl:

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03834-03

    Original file (03834-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06337-03

    Original file (06337-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner requests to receive the additional award level for the LSRB UIC 44321. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for' the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00177-03

    Original file (00177-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05675-03

    Original file (05675-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.