Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10564-02
Original file (10564-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT  OF THE  NAVY 

BOARD  FOR  C O R R E C T I O N  O F   NAVAL  RECORDS 

2  NAVY  ANNEX 

WASHINGTON  D C   2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0  

JLP: ddj 
Docket No:  10564-02 
6 May,  2003 

This is in  reference to your application for correction of your  naval  recora pursuant to the 
provisions of  title  10 of  the United  States Code, section  1552. 

A  three-member panel of  the Board  for Correction of  Naval  Recorda, sitting in  executive session, 
considered your  application on  May  6, 2003.  Your  allegations of  erro  and  injustice were 
reviewed  in  accordance with  administrative regulations and  procedures applicable to  the 
proceedings of  this Board.  Documentary  material  considered by  the Board  consisted of  your 
applica(ion, together with  all  material  submitted in  support thereof, yoyr  naval  record and 
applicable statutes, regulations and  policies.  In  addition, the  Board  cogsidered the advisory 
opinion  furnished by  CNO memorandum  5420 Nl3OD 1103U0298 of  17 April 2003, a copy of 
which  is attached. 

t 

I 

After  careful and  conscientious consideration of  the entire record, the Board  found  that the 
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish  the existence of  probabje material error or 
injustice.  In  this connection, the Board  substantially concurred  with  thb comments contained in 
the advisory opinion.  Accordingly, your  application  has  been  denied.  The names and  votes of 
the members of  the panel  will  be  furnished upon  request. 

It is regretted that the circumstances of  your  case are such  that favorable action cannot be  taken. 
You  are entitled to have the Board  reconsider its decision  upon  submission of  new  and  material 
evidence or other matter  not previously considered by  the Board.  In  this regard, it is important 
to  keep in  mind  that a presumption  of  regularity attaches to  all official records.  Consequently, 
when  applying for a correction of  an  official naval  record, the burden  is on  the applicant to 
demonstrate the existence of  probable material error or injustice. 

Enclosure 

W .  DEAN PFEIFFER 
Executive Director 

D E P A R T M E N T   OF  T H E   NAVY 
OFFICE  O F  THE  CHIEF  OF  NAVAL  OPERATIONS 

2000  NAVY  PENTAGON 

WASHINGTON.  D.C.  2 0 3 5 0 - 2 0 0 0  

IN  REPLY  R E F E R   TO 

5420 
N130D1/ 03110298 
17 April 2003 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOF 

CORRECTION OF 

NAVAL RECORDS 

Subj:  COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF 

I 

Encl :  (1) BCNR case file #10564-02 

1.  The following provides comment and recommendation on Seaman 

petition. 

2.  N130 recommends disapproval of on Seaman 
for an Enlistment Bonus  (EB) . 

petition 

3.  Seaman -entered 
March 2002 and volunteered for Seafarer Seaman Apprentice 
Training Program Guarantee.  Seaman -eceived 
EB.  He requests favorable action that would allow payment of an 
EB College Kicker. 

the Delayed Entry Program (DEP) on 20 

a $3,000 

4.  EB is not an entitlement, but a recruiting tool used at the 
discretion of recruiters and classifiers to entic',: individuals 
to enlist in critical skills.  The EB program is budgeted based 
on quotas provided by the Commander, Navy Recruiting Command and 
the Enlisted Community Managers, not by the number of  "A" School 
accession -c,-.ts. An EB College Kicker is an EB .!itid is governed 
under the preceding rules.  Every recruit is not affered nor 
receives an EB or an EB College Kicker.  Seama-oes 
have an EB College Kicker contract in his servict~ I t'.l:l::~-,:: 
therefore is not entitled to an EB College Kicker. 

not 

and 

5.  BCNR case file is returned 

~ e a d y  Enlisted B O ~ U : ' ~  
Programs Branch 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01420-03

    Original file (01420-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. D.C. 20350-2000 I N R E P L Y R E F E R T O 5420 Nl3 OD1 / 03110236 26 Mar 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS E CASE OF I Encl:...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00320-03

    Original file (00320-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. D.C. 20350-2000 IN R E P L Y R E F E R TO 5420 N13 OD1 / 0 3 ~ 0 2 4 5 26 Mar 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN APPRENTICE . In his petition, Seaman Apprentice a requests favorable action that would allow payment of a $2,000 EB College Kicker.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01458-03

    Original file (01458-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. D.C. 20350-2000 IN R E P L Y R E F E R TO 5420 N13 OD1 / 03210239 26 Mar 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00705-03

    Original file (00705-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00762-03

    Original file (00762-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. N130 recommends disapproval of for an Enlistment Bonus (EB) Colleg 3.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00761-03

    Original file (00761-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. In his petition, action that would allow paym CF Program quests favorable EB College Kicker.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07245-02

    Original file (07245-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FORCORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP : ddj Docket No: 26 November 2002 7245-02 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. h A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. In addition, the Board considered the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00036-03

    Original file (00036-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Petty Officer College Kicker EB contract in his service record and therefore is not entitled to a College Kicker EB.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07000-02

    Original file (07000-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 2002. that would allow payment of an $8,000 He shipped to Recruit T In his petition, Seaman 2001, and signed contract for a volunteered for the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07383-02

    Original file (07383-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 20350-2000 54rQl@PLV REFER TO N130D1/02U0589 29 Ott 2002 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, NAVAL RECORDS BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF Subj : HE CASE 0 Encl: (1) BCNR case file #07383-02 with microfiche service...