DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
TJR
Docket No: 7312-00
13 April 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 4 April 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations,
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
The Board found you enlisted in the Navy on 19 February 1981 at
the age of 19.
Your record reflects that you served for a year
and two months without incident but on 23 April 1982 you received
nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for possession of marijuana and were
awarded a $618 forfeiture of pay and restriction and extra duty
for 45 days.
to your appointed place of duty and a four day period of
unauthorized absence (UA).
The punishment imposed was
confinement on bread and water for three days.
On 14 June 1982 you received NJP for failure to go
Your record further reflects that on 4 March 1983 you received
NJP for absence from your appointed place of duty and were
awarded a $150 forfeiture of pay.
1983 you received NJP for three specifications of failure to go
to your appointed place of duty and a 19 day period of UA.
On 14 June and again on 6 July
Subsequently, you were processed for an administrative separation
action by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct and
frequent involvement of a discreditable nature with military
NJPs is in error.
However, the Board concluded these factors
and on 1 September 1983 you
On 19 August 1983 the discharge authority directed
authorities.
an other than honorable discharge,
were so discharged.
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
and your contention that your record
your youth and immaturity,
of
were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your
discharge given the repetitive nature of your serious misconduct,
The Board noted that there is no
which resulted in five
evidence in the record, and you submitted none, to support your
contention of erroneous information regarding your record of
Further, since you did not file appeals to any of the
NJPs.
NJPs, the Board concluded that the
Given all the circumstances of your case, the Board concluded
your discharge was proper as issued and no change is warranted.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
NJPs.
NJPs were properly imposed.
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04252-01
Docket No: 4252-01 23 November 2001 .This is in reference to your naval record pursuant to the States Code, Section 1552. application for correction of your provisions of Title 10, United A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03764-01
Your allegations of error and After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. you& appointed place of duty On 25 October 1983 vou received was On 15 November 1983 the BCD was to be executed, Subsequently, the suspension of the forfeitures and BCD were vacated. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden‘is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06179-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. received NJP for failure to go to your appointed place of duty, and assault. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03029-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The punishment imposed was a $286 forfeiture of pay, restriction for 30 days, extra duty for 45 days, and a reduction to On 14 December 1982, after undergoing a medical evaluation, medical authorities determined that you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01600-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 August 2000. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Your record reflects that on 2 July 1982 The Board found you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 28 January 1981 at the age of 19. you received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for two periods of absence from your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02970-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. drugs. factors and contention were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge because of the serious nature of your repetitive drug related misconduct which resulted in five all the circumstances of your case, discharge was proper as issued and no change is warranted.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00605-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 October 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01200-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. absence from your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00898-01
On 3 June 1983 an ADB recommended you be issued a general discharge by reason of Shortly thereafter, on 17 May After misconduct due to drug abuse. discharged by reason of misconduct normally receive discharges Accordingly, you were under other than honorable conditions. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03041-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. On 21 August 1983 the discharge authority then directed an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct, and on 31 August 1983 you were so discharged. ...