DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAV
Y
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
NAVY
ANNEX
2
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
S
TRG
Docket No: 7393-01
22 February 2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 20 February 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
You then
On that date you
The
for the periods ending 31
The enlisted performance record (page 9) shows that in
You were released from active duty in the rate of FA on
You enlisted in the Navy on 24 August 1987 at age 20.
served without incident until 13 December 1990.
received nonjudicial punishment for use of marijuana.
punishment imposed included a reduction in rate from FN (E-3) to
FA (E-2).
the next two performance evaluations,
January 1991 and 23 August 1991, you received above average
marks.
23 August 1991, with your service characterized as honorable.
At that time you acknowledged that you were not recommended for
reenlistment and were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code because
of your failure to meet professional growth criteria.
Subsequently, you were issued an honorable discharge at the end
of your military obligation.
In reaching its decision, the Board noted that the nonjudicial
punishment for wrongful use of marijuana is considered to be a
serious offense and current regulations require processing for
discharge under other than honorable conditions, for such an
offense.
for reenlistment and the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code.
It could also be used to support a non-recommendation
In addition, regulations require the assignment of an RE-4
reenlistment code to an individual who fails to meet professional
growth criteria because he is separated in pay grade E-2 after an
Since you have been treated no
extended period of active duty.
differently than others in your situation, the Board could not
find an error or injustice in the assignment of the RE-4
reenlistment code.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The names and
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08587-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 May 1999. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals discharged in pay grades E-l and E-2 for failure to meet professional growth criteria. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03647-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.Although your record is incomplete, it does show that you enlisted in the Navy on 21 October 1987 and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02930-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 September 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The instruction states, in part, as follows: To satisfy professional growth criteria for the first reenlistment (including first enlistment in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02183-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 November 2002. of misconduct reenlistment code was denied based on your record and because you were serving in pay grade However, your request for a change in the E-2 after four years of Your record has been corrected to show an active service. YOU are now requesting that the record be corrected to show that you were not reduced in rate to pay grade E-2 one of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08436-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The instruction states, in part, as follows: To satisfy professional growth criteria for the first reenlistment...the member must be: (1) serving as a petty officer or, (2) serving in paygrade E-3 having passed an examination for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2540-13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7015S. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 April 2014. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in the reentry code given your NJP, and the fact that you received a reentry code authorized by regulations.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05011-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. notes, in part, as follows: However, the Board concluded these The instruction also paygrade To satisfy professional growth criteria for the first reenlistment (including first enlistment in USN after serving on active duty as USNR), the member must be: (1) serving as a petty officer or,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06846-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your applications, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 5 August 1998, you enlisted in the Naval Reserve at age 18 and began a three year period of active...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03837-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your ~ application on 26 January 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, an RE-4 reentry code is authorized when an individual is discharged at the expiration of his term of active obligated service...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01181-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 November 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 18 June 1993, you were honorably discharged from active duty while serving in pay grade E-3.