DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
JRE
Docket No:
26 February 2002
7334-01
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 14 February 2002. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board.
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
Documentary material considered by the Board
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
The Board found that you served on active duty in the Navy from 6 November 1997 to 13
November 1998, when you were discharged by reason of a condition, not a disability,
interfering with your performance of duty.
to indicate that you were not recommended for reenlistment, and not eligible without the
prior approval of the Chief of Naval Personnel.
Although available records are incomplete,
it appears that your discharge was based on diagnosed occupational problems, and adjustment
disorder and dysfunctional personality traits, which adversely affected your performance of
duty, as well as your belief that you were not suited for military service, your dissatisfaction
with the Navy, and your desire to be discharged.
You were assigned a reenlistment code of RE-4
The Board concluded that the basis for your separation is amply supported by the available
records, and it was unable to conclude that your discharge or reenlistment code were
erroneous. It rejected your unsubstantiated contention that you were misadvised concerning
the effect of your reenlistment code.
In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that
your discharge was erroneous, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in
your case. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the
members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02878-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 October 2002. The Board also concluded that given your hostility toward military authority, you are unsuitable for military service, irrespective of the validity of your diagnosis. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04215-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You completed a Statement of Medical History on that date in which you denied any history of treatment or symptoms of a heart condition,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09278-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. 2001, and you were discharged by reason of physical disability on 1 February lo%, and recommended that you be discharged by reason of You accepted the findings of the PEB The Board concluded that in view of your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01040-10
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board found these factors were insufficient to warrant changing your reenlistment code due to your diagnosed adjustment disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07181-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 January 2002. In view of the foregoing, the Board was unable to recommend that your discharge be modified, or that you be assigned a reenlistment code which would permit you to reenlist without first obtaining a waiver of your disabling condition. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06419-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 September 2002. consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07565-02
Documentary material considered by the Board Your allegations of error and After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. The Board found that you underwent a pre-enlistment physical examination on 19 July 2000. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04422-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You were As there is no indication in the available records that you were unfit to perform your duties by reason of physical disability at the time of your discharge, or that your discharge was erroneous or unjust, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08713-01
You “Misconduct A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 February 2002. In this connection, the Board found that your naval record shows you received NJP on 29 November 1989 for possession of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD); that you did not appeal; that you disclosed your use and possession of LSD to a Naval Investigative Service agent; and that you were consequently separated on 14 February 1990 by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01156-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 October 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...