Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07324-00
Original file (07324-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

TRG
Docket No: 7324-00
4 April 2001

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 3 April 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.

Your allegations of error and

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

The Board found that on 22 July 1999 you were granted a waiver
for using marijuana four times.
At that time, you acknowledged
that drug use would not be tolerated and that urinalysis testing
would occur when your reported to active duty.
On 27 July 1999
you enlisted in the Delayed Entry Program of the Naval Reserve
and, on 1 October 1999, you enlisted in the Navy at age 18. On
14 October 1999 the Navy Drug Laboratory reported that your
accession urinalysis showed that you had used marijuana.

you were processed for an

Based on the positive urinalysis,
administrative separation by reason of erroneous enlistment due
In connection with this processing, you elected
to drug abuse.
to waive your procedural rights.
After review, the separation
authority directed an entry level separation and you were so
separated on 27 October 1999.
recommended for reenlistment and were assigned an RE-4
reenlistment code.

At that time you were not

Regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code
when an individual is separated from Navy recruit training due to
Since you have been treated no differently than
drug abuse.
others separated for that reason, the Board could not find an

error or injustice in the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment
code.

Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

The names and

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

2



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00069-01

    Original file (00069-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 June 2001. Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-3J reenlistment code when an individual in an entry level status tests positive for marijuana use, served less than 30 days in the DEP, confessed to the use of marijuana during the moment of truth, and was processed for separation by reason of fraudulent enlistment. Consequently, when applying for a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02539-01

    Original file (02539-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01148-01

    Original file (01148-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 ELP Docket No. 1148-01 28 June 2001 Dea r

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07008-00

    Original file (07008-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 April 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. on the urinalysis you were processed for an administrative separation by reason of erroneous enlistment due to drug abuse. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07758-98

    Original file (07758-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. not set forth a reason for separation of The reason for separation of The Board was also aware that Navy regulations do "erroneous enlistment-drug "preservice drug abuse." Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00954-01

    Original file (00954-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 June 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with adm'inistrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Your allegations of error and mzterial submitted in support After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04758-01

    Original file (04758-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 July 2901. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. On 4 August 1999 the At that time you were Subsequently, on 9 The Board noted that applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06144-01

    Original file (06144-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. than others separated from the Navy for that reason, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the assignment of the 4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01565-01

    Original file (01565-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01284-02

    Original file (01284-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your Your allegations of error and application on 8 May 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. as evidenced by the positive You were advised of and waived all of and you were assigned an RE-4 On 17 May 2000 you the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code Regulations require to an...