NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05470-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum which is attached. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by 3 .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05471-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 August 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05471-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, tiled enclosure ( 1 ) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitlement to Continuous Subniarine Pay (CONSLIB). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Mackey, and Geisler, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and inijustice on 12 March 2002and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05477-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy JLP: ddj Docket No: 27 February 2001 5477-O --. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to promotion to a higher paygrade. The Board, consisting of Messrs....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05478-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 05478-01 except for paygrade for accessions via the PRISE III program is Recommend disapproval of enclosure 1. the maximum E-3, Field(NF).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05481-01
1552 Encl : (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) CNO memorandum 7220 Ser N (3) Subject ’s naval record 13OC3/01 II 1290 of 4 October 2001 Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, in effect, that the applicable naval record be 1. filed enclosure corrected to show Petitioner is entitled to travel of dependents and shipment, of household goods (I) with this Board requesting, (HHGs) to May TX. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05482-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. following an NJP for drug abuse, for an administrative discharge, processing in the record. As indicated, there is no evidence that the commanding...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05485-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS Y HEADQUARTERS 3280 RUSSELL ROA D QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22 134-5 103 IN REPLY REFER TO: 1600 MMOA-4 10 Jul 01 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: Ref: (a) MMER Request of 09 Jul 01. in the case USMC Recommend approval of 1. of his failure of selection to Lieutenant Colonel. Lieutenant successfully petitioned the Performance Evaluation Review Board for removal of the Reviewing Officer co Transfer...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05488-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett, Pfeiffer, and Taylor, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 7 August 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05490-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOF, CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD X 2 NAVY ANNE S WASHINGTON DC 20370 510 0 TRG Docket No: 6 June 2001 5490-00 Dear This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United States Code section 1552.. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 May 2001. injustice were reviewed regulations and procedures...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05490-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum which is attached. Per reference (b), school or "C" C .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05491-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05491-01
I A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 November 2001. In addition, the Board considered the advisory N32/6502 of 30 October 2001, a n~emorantlum 133 Ser 1 conscienlious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the After careful and evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Correction of Naval Records only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05492-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The However, the presumably for at least such as your youth and your The Board found that In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, expression of regret for your actions. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05493-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TRG Docket No: 5493-01 2 November 2001 From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF IIL (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy filed enclosure (1) with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05495-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05497-01
Your allegations of error and A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05499-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP:ddj Docket No: 5499-01 30 August 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in of college credit hours. Shy,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05504-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAW ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC:ddj Docket No: 5504-00 24 October 2000 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 October 2000. were reviewed in accordance with administrative...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05505-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 December 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. In addition, it is clear that you would have been issued an undesirable discharged by reason of fraudulent enlistment if you had not been convicted by court-martial of the unauthorized absences. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05506-00
In addition, the VA rates all conditions it classifies as “service connected", without regard to the issue of fitness for military service, and ratings may be raised or lowered throughout a veteran’s life time as the degree of severity of the rated conditions changes. The VA awarded you a 50% rating, while classifying your condition as "mild". Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05507-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. evidence that the board acted contrary to law, the action of the board involved material error of fact or material administrative error, or the board did not have material information before it. This is the date of rank he would have in this matter is Chief Warrant Officer 2 DEPARTMENT OF...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05512-00
Your request for promotion to commander was not considered, as you have not been selected to that grade by a duly constituted officer promotion selection board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The board had the official record on which to base their decisions.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05514-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone AE rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Morgan, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner iri_justice on 10 October 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, allegations of error and determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05516-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 September 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. selectee.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05517-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. RR-4 reenlistment code. Subsequently, you were At that time, you The record In your application you state that you are a member of the National Guard and desire a change in the reenlistment code so you can enter active duty in the Army.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05522-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 September 2001. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. As stated in Paragraph 010205A of enclosure "had over 4 years of active service as an enlisted member" to be entitled to the special rate of pay as an O-3E.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05524-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. you were fortunate to have received a general discharge because your drug abuse could have resulted in a discharge under other than honorable conditions. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05527-01
factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge, given your record of numerous counseling entries. such as your contention that the However, the Board concluded that these Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged due to misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05528-01
enlisted member of the United States Naval Reserve filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he was released from active duty on 3 January 1995 vice being released on 21 December 1994. Petitioner enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 7 May 1992 and reported for two years of active duty on 4 January 1993. 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of 2 (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) Naval Records and having...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05529-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 LCC:ddj Docket No: 5529-01 25 September 2001 _.- This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05531-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 July 2001. Opportunity to draw education benefits from the VEGIB Program ended on 31 December 1989. b. VEGIB Program members who were on active duty any time between 19 October 1984 and 1 July 1985 and served continuously from that date through 30 June 1988, followed by four years in the Selected Reserves, had their remaining entitlement converted to Montgomery...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05535-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 December 2001. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Specialty Advisor for Pulmonary Medicine dated 6 September 2001, a copy of which is attached. The information provided in the physical examination and medical record is not sufficient to conclusively establish the diagnosis of asthma in this patient, however it does appear...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05542-99
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bishop, Chapman, and Ms. Schnittman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 31 May regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05543-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The findings of the PEB were mailed to you at your last On 8 June In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that your condition was ratable at 40% or higher at the time of your discharge, and that you were compliant with medical advice, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05545-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 August 2001. As the Board was not persuaded that the disability rating you were assigned by the Secretary of the Navy is erroneous or unjust, it was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05548-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OFNAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC: ddj Docket No: 5548-01 7 August 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: Encl: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. The...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05553-01
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Goldsmith and Zsalman and Ms. Leblanc, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 30 August 2001, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070) “) counseling entry dated 28 May 1998. Correction of Naval Records approve Staff request...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05554-01
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, A three-memberpanel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your Your allegations of error and application on 15 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. recommendation, you elected to waive the right to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05555-01
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. Character of service is based, in part, on one's conduct and overall traits averages, both of which are computed from marks assigned during periodic evaluations. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05556-01
1552 Encl : (1) (2) (3) DD Form 149 w/attachments BUPERS Subject’s naval record memorandtini 1780 PEKS 604 of 29 August 2001 Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be MGIB Program when first eligible. corrected to show that he elected to participate in the The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett, Whitener, and 2. allegations of error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05558-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in a higher paygrade. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Chapman, and Ms. Gilbert, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 06 September 2000 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05560-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 October injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge due to.the fact that your unauthorized absences totalled nearly Accordingly, your Based on the foregoing,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05563-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. During the period 16 March 1996 to 13 May 1998, you You reenlisted in the Navy on 13 April 1990 for five years and subsequently extended that enlistment on three occasions totaling 39 months. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05565-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC:ddj Docket No: 5565-01 7 August 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. The Board,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05569-01
At that time you were assigned an RR-4 You state in your application that since discharge you have attended weight management and nutrition courses and are now within weight standards. Finally, the Board noted the adverse marks in two categories in the last performance evaluation and The Board that you were not recommended for advancement. believed that despite the excellent comments concerning your performance of duty, the adverse marks and comments meant that a recommendation for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05573-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 August 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Your record...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05574-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP:ddj Docket No: 2 October 2001 5574-01 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the I.Jnited States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2001. references (c) and (d) for members like...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05575-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett, Pfeiffer, and Taylor, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 7 August 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken evidence of record. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05577-01
1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. retired Naval Reserve Officer filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he is entitled to retired pay at age 60. because he did not have the last eight years of qualifying service in the Naval Reserve. Since Petitioner will be 60 years old on 29 December 2001 he With these corrections, Petitioner will...