DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
JLP:ddj
Docket No: 5478-01
27 December 2001
Dear SEAMAN
This is in reference to your
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
application for correction of your naval record pursuant to
the<
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 27 December 2001. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser
a copy of which is attached.
N32/06523 of 6 December 2001,
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied.
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The names and votes of
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Consequently,
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAW
RECFUTlNG COMMAND
5722 INTEGRITY DR.
MILUNGTON.TENNESSEE
3f3054-50!i7
IN REPLY REFER TO:
1133
Ser
6
Dee 01
N32P6523
From:
To:
Subj:
Ref:
Commander,
Executive Director,
Navy Recruiting Command
Board for Correction of Naval Records
BCNR REQUEST ICO
(a) COMNAVCRUITCOMINST
(b) DD Form
1966/3
1130.8F
Encl:
(1) BCNR Docket Nr. 05478-01
except for
paygrade for accessions via the PRISE III program is
Recommend disapproval of enclosure
1.
the maximum
E-3,
Field(NF).
applicant was authorized to
programs.
reenlist as an E-3 via the PRISE III program into a rating or
program listed under the current NAVET matrix.
Applicant did not enlist in any advanced
Per reference
NAVETs guaranteed AECF,
CTI(N), or the Nuclear
paygrade
(1).
Per reference (a),
(b),
This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for
2.
Correction of Naval Records only.
Enclosure (1) is returned.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05170-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 December 2001. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07656-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Time in rate is always assigned as the year of re-entry into the Navy for NAVETS returning in a lower paygrade.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01867-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER copy of which is attached. (b), applicant enlisted into PN rating under PRISE III 1. and program.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07972-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVY RECRUITING COMMAND 5722 INTEGRITY DR. MILLINGTON. Time in rate is always assigned as the year of re-entry into the Navy for NAVETS returning in a lower paygrade.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07437-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 December 2001. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser a copy of which is attached N32/06521 of 6 December 2001, After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06832-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03718-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02208-02
mh MEH: Docket No: 2208-02 9 July 2002 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 Dear This is in reference to your application provisions of title 10 of the IJnitetl States Code, section 1552. for correction of your naval record pursuant to the OI,I for accord;mce with A three-member panel of the Hoard session, considered your application were reviewed in proceedings of this application, together with applicable statutes, opinion...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01395-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04780-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNRC memorandum 1133 Ser is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.